BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana multi family housing expert witness Hamlet Indiana condominium expert witness Hamlet Indiana office building expert witness Hamlet Indiana retail construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana parking structure expert witness Hamlet Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana housing expert witness Hamlet Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Hamlet Indiana condominiums expert witness Hamlet Indiana custom homes expert witness Hamlet Indiana industrial building expert witness Hamlet Indiana custom home expert witness Hamlet Indiana institutional building expert witness Hamlet Indiana low-income housing expert witness Hamlet Indiana townhome construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Hamlet Indiana casino resort expert witness Hamlet Indiana production housing expert witness Hamlet Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Hamlet Indiana Medical building expert witness Hamlet Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hamlet, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hamlet Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Northwest Indiana
    Local # 1564
    1356 W Lincolnway
    Valparaiso, IN 46385
    http://www.pcbaonline.com

    Marshall Co Chapter
    Local # 1554
    PO Box 464
    Plymouth, IN 46563


    Builders Association of Elkhart Co
    Local # 1512
    25428 County Road 20
    Elkhart, IN 46517
    http://www.ba-ec.com

    Builders Association of Laporte County
    Local # 1534
    2626 N S R 39
    La Porte, IN 46350
    http://www.balc.org

    Builders Association of Kosciusko-Fulton Counties
    Local # 1541
    313 S Buffalo St Suite B
    Warsaw, IN 46580
    http://www.bakfc.com

    Jasper County Home Builders Association
    Local # 1550
    511 4th Ave. NW
    Demotte, IN 46310
    http://www.jaspercountyhba.com

    Builders Association of Northeast IN
    Local # 1572
    PO Box 861
    Angola, IN 46703
    http://www.ba-ni.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hamlet Indiana
    Corporate Profile

    HAMLET INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Hamlet, Indiana Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims evaluation, testimony, and support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets comprising building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Hamlet and the surrounding areas.

    Hamlet Indiana building code expert witnessHamlet Indiana construction defect expert witnessHamlet Indiana structural concrete expertHamlet Indiana construction code expert witnessHamlet Indiana hospital construction expert witnessHamlet Indiana construction expert witness public projectsHamlet Indiana construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hamlet, Indiana

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem

    September 08, 2026 —
    This is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects. An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist. Reprinted courtesy of Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Newman may be contacted at oknewman@duanemorris.com

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke Win Final Summary Judgment on Behalf of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    November 02, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke won final summary judgment on behalf of their client, a homeowner’s insurance company. The case related to a claim for damage caused by Hurricane Milton, which was reported more than ten months after the date of loss. The homeowner’s insurance company reviewed historical aerial photography of the roof and determined that there was no evidence of damage immediately after the Hurricane, which was inconsistent with the condition of the roof when it was inspected more than ten months later. Additionally, the homeowner’s insurance company was unable to determine when the interior water damage occurred due to the delay in reporting the claim. After a lawsuit was filed, the Traub Lieberman team took depositions of the Plaintiffs and the opposing expert and eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the failure to timely report the claim and resulting prejudice to their client. The Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment finding that notice of the claim was untimely as a matter of law and that the Plaintiffs failed to rebut the legal presumption of prejudice to the insurance company. As a result of the ruling, the insurance company has a valid claim for attorney’s fees. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan S. Parker, Traub Lieberman, Robert Biferie, Traub Lieberman and Matthew Groteke, Traub Lieberman Mr. Parker may be contacted at rparker@tlsslaw.com Mr. Biferie may be contacted at rbiferie@tlsslaw.com Mr. Groteke may be contacted at mgroteke@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    Colorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo Developers

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    BHA has a Nice Swing Benefits the Wounded Warrior Project
    Ninth Circuit Resolves Federal-State Court Split Regarding Whether 'Latent' Defects Discovered After Duration of Warranty Period are Actionable under California's Lemon Law Statute

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property

    America’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure Investment

    No Indemnity Coverage Where Insured Suffers No Loss

    New York Restaurant and Bar Fire Caused by Electric Defect

    Pinterest Nixes Big San Francisco Lease Deal in Covid Scaleback

    Counter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in Construction

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    To Bee or Not to Bee - CA Court Finds Denial of Coverage Based on Exclusion was Premature Where Facts had not been Judicially Determined

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    General Contractors: Consider Importance of "Primary Noncontributory" Language

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably Intertwined

    Witt Named to 2017 Super Lawyers

    Don’t Assert as a Counterclaim to a Lien Foreclosure Lawsuit an Order to Show Cause Claim

    The Godfather of Solar Predicts Its Future

    Texas Federal District Court Dismisses COVID-19 Claim

    Smoke and Soot Constitute Direct Physical Loss

    Roadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction Zone

    Bad Faith in the First Party Insurance Context

    OSHA Updates: You May Be Affected

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    2017 California Construction Law Update

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    Kentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies Appeal

    Winning Construction Disputes: Strategic Negotiation for Better Outcomes

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    Housing Agency Claims It Is Not a Party in Construction Defect Case

    Insurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 Proceeding

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Governor Signs AB5 Into Law — Reshaping California's Independent Contractor Classification Landscape

    Ex-Corps Worker Pleads Guilty to Bribery on Afghan Contract

    Texas Granted Primacy Over Class VI Carbon Storage Wells

    Eminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway Project

    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    You Filed a Mechanic’s Lien. Then You Discovered a Mistake. Now What?

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    2017 Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure

    Baltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal Deadline

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Urban Retrofits, Tall Buildings, and Sustainability

    Forensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam Failure

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes
    1880">Insurer’s Discovery Requests Ruled to be Overbroad in Construction Defect Suit

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    What I Learned at My First NAWIC National Conference

    2016 California Construction Law Upate

    Allegations Confirm Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Pandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer Payments

    Would You Trade a Parking Spot for an Extra Bedroom?

    Grupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-Up

    Design-Assist, an Ambiguous Term Causing Conflict in the Construction Industry[1]

    Rebuilding After the 2025 Southern California Fires