BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Jasonville Indiana casino resort expert witness Jasonville Indiana production housing expert witness Jasonville Indiana housing expert witness Jasonville Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana hospital construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana low-income housing expert witness Jasonville Indiana industrial building expert witness Jasonville Indiana parking structure expert witness Jasonville Indiana multi family housing expert witness Jasonville Indiana custom home expert witness Jasonville Indiana townhome construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana office building expert witness Jasonville Indiana condominium expert witness Jasonville Indiana custom homes expert witness Jasonville Indiana Medical building expert witness Jasonville Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Jasonville Indiana tract home expert witness Jasonville Indiana retail construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Jasonville Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jasonville, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jasonville Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Jackson-Jennings Builders Association
    Local # 1574
    11990 W Mt Healthy Rd
    Columbus, IN 47201
    http://www.jjba.org

    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    http://www.mcbaindiana.org

    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001


    Southeastern Indiana chapter
    Local # 1536
    394 W County Road 400 N
    Greensburg, IN 47240


    Home Builders Association of Gtr Terre Haute
    Local # 1582
    2747 Sidenbender Rd
    Terre Haute, IN 47802
    http://www.hbaterrehaute.com

    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451


    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jasonville Indiana

    Chris Konzelmann Appointed to NASP Board of Directors

    Everybody Is Going to End Up Paying for Texas' Climate Crisis

    Congratulations to BWB&O Partner John Toohey and His Fellow Panel Members on Their Inclusion in West Coast Casualty’s 2022 Program!

    An Expert’s Qualifications are Important

    California Supreme Court Rejects Third Exception to Privette Doctrine

    Notice of Completion Determines Mechanics Lien Deadline

    Techniques for Resolving Construction Disputes

    Insurer Springs a Leak in Its Pursuit of Subrogation

    Limiting Liability: Three Clauses to Consider in your Next Construction Contract

    U.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days Inn

    Rainwater Collecting on Rooftop is not Subject to Policy's Flood Sublimits

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    Malerie Anderson Named to D Magazine’s 2023 Best Lawyers Under 40

    The Prompt Payment Act Obligation is Not Triggered When the Owner Holds Less Retention from the General Contractor

    Licensing Reciprocity Comes to Virginia

    Commercial Real Estate Brokerages in an Uncertain Russian Market

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    Uniform Rules Governing New York’s Supreme and County Courts Get An Overhaul

    Solar and Wind Just Passed Another Big Turning Point

    Boston Building Boom Seems Sustainable

    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    How is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?

    New York Assembly Reconsiders ‘Bad Faith’ Bill

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorneys Named Super Lawyers in 2016

    The Hunton Policyholder’s Guide to Artificial Intelligence: SEC’s Recent AI-Washing Claims Present D&O Risks, Potential Coverage Challenges

    Before Celebrating the Market Rebound, Builders Need to Read the Fine Print: New Changes in Construction Law Coming Out of the Recession

    Ex-San Francisco DPW Director Sentenced to Seven Years in Corruption Case

    California Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Commissioner’s Authority to Regulate Replacement Cost Estimates

    Corps Releases Final Report on $29B Texas Gulf Coast Hurricane Defense Plan

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    Deadlines Count for Construction Defects in Florida

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    Former NYC Condo Empire Executive Arrested for Larceny, Tax Fraud

    Cincinnati Goes Green

    Illinois Federal Court Determines if Damages Are Too Remote

    California Supreme Court McMillin Ruling

    City Covered From Lawsuits Filed After Hurricane-Damaged Dwellings Demolished

    Should Post Contract Award Tariffs be Reimbursable? Why Public Works Contractors Deserve Clarity

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    New York Court Temporarily Enjoins UCC Foreclosure Sale

    Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case Triggered by Complaint's Allegations

    EPA Seeks Comment on Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule

    Federal Judge Refuses to Limit Coverage and Moves Forward with Policyholder’s Claims Against Insurer and Broker

    Inverse Condemnation and Roadwork

    Travelers v. Larimer County and the Concept of Covered Cause of Loss

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Federal Court Strikes Down 'Persuader' Rule
    Corporate Profile

    JASONVILLE INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Jasonville, Indiana Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with regional assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Jasonville and the surrounding areas.

    Jasonville Indiana fenestration expert witnessJasonville Indiana building code compliance expert witnessJasonville Indiana construction forensic expert witnessJasonville Indiana ada design expert witnessJasonville Indiana civil engineer expert witnessJasonville Indiana expert witness roofingJasonville Indiana consulting general contractor
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jasonville, Indiana

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    March 31, 2026 —
    Several homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    July 20, 2026 —
    I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party. Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Supreme Court Rules Tariffs Unconstitutional: Why the Construction Industry Shouldn’t Expect Calm Just Yet

    March 31, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did what many expected: It held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. What few anticipated was the speed of what followed: Within hours of the ruling, the administration announced replacement tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed a 10% global surcharge effective February 24, and signaled forthcoming Section 301 investigations against most major trading partners. For those in the construction industry hoping the Learning Resources ruling would restore market stability, the message was unambiguous. The constitutional question may be settled, but the market disruption is not. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Barnett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com