BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Napoleon Indiana multi family housing expert witness Napoleon Indiana Medical building expert witness Napoleon Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana townhome construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana housing expert witness Napoleon Indiana parking structure expert witness Napoleon Indiana industrial building expert witness Napoleon Indiana hospital construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana custom home expert witness Napoleon Indiana low-income housing expert witness Napoleon Indiana condominium expert witness Napoleon Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Napoleon Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana casino resort expert witness Napoleon Indiana tract home expert witness Napoleon Indiana institutional building expert witness Napoleon Indiana retail construction expert witness Napoleon Indiana office building expert witness Napoleon Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Napoleon Indiana custom homes expert witness Napoleon Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Napoleon, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Napoleon Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Jackson-Jennings Builders Association
    Local # 1574
    11990 W Mt Healthy Rd
    Columbus, IN 47201
    http://www.jjba.org

    Southeastern Indiana chapter
    Local # 1536
    394 W County Road 400 N
    Greensburg, IN 47240


    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    http://www.mcbaindiana.org

    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001


    Home Builders Association of Gtr Terre Haute
    Local # 1582
    2747 Sidenbender Rd
    Terre Haute, IN 47802
    http://www.hbaterrehaute.com

    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451


    Madison County Chapter
    Local # 1504
    853 E. Southern Avenue
    Indianapolis, IN 46203



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Napoleon Indiana

    North Carolina Court Rules In Favor Of All Sums

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    Remembering Joseph H. Foster

    Appellate Court of Maryland Construes Notice Conditions of A312 Performance Bond in Favor of Surety

    California Contractor Tests the Bounds of Job Order Contracting

    California Supreme Court McMillin Ruling

    Coverage Found For Cleanup of Superfund Site Despite Pollution Exclusion

    The Creation of San Fransokyo

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Denies Bad Faith Claim in HO Policy Dispute

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Hennigh Law Corporation Wins Award Against Viracon, Inc In Defective Gray PIB Case

    Best Practices After Receiving Notice of a Construction Claim

    Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review Regarding Necessary Parties in Lien Foreclosure Actions

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers

    Washington State Updates the Contractor Registration Statute

    Spearin Doctrine: Alive, Well and Thriving on its 100th Birthday

    Cross-Office Team Secures Defense Verdict in Favor of Client in Asbestos Case

    Caveat Emptor (“Buyer Beware!”) Exceptions

    Home Sales Going to Investors in Daytona Beach Area

    Courts Favor Arbitration in Two Recent Construction Dispute Cases

    Client Alert: Court Settles Conflict between CCP and Rules of Court Regarding Demurrer Deadline Following Amended Complaint

    ASCE Releases New Report on Benefits and Burdens of Infrastructure Investment in Disadvantaged Communities

    Windstorm Exclusion Found Ambiguous

    Insured's Experts Excluded, But Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment Denied

    The Arbitration Club… Is Not So Exclusive

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    LA Fire Victims Can Pursue City Utility Claims, Judge Rules

    New Homes in Palo Alto to Be Electric-Car Ready

    Duty To Defend PFAS MDL Lawsuits: Texas Federal Court Weighs In

    Greystone on Remand Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment To Bar Coverage For Construction Defects

    Seattle Developer Defaults on Renovated Office Buildings

    Ill-fated Complaint Fails to State Claims Against Broker and FEMA

    Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos Exposure

    Be Sure to Bring Up Any Mechanic’s Lien Defenses Early and Often

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    Lewis Brisbois Successfully Concludes Privacy Dispute for Comedian Kathy Griffin Following Calif. Supreme Court Denial of Review

    Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent Defects

    April Rise in Construction Spending Not That Much

    Ohio Supreme Court Case to Decide Whether or Not to Expand Insurance Coverage Under GC’s CGL Insurance Policies

    Commonwealth Court Strikes Blow to Philly Window and Door Ordinance

    Is Construction in Arizona Back to Normal?

    California Superior Court Overrules Insurer's Demurrer on COVID-19 Claim

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Declines to Eight-Month Low

    It’s Time to Change the Way You Think About Case Complexity

    Newmeyer & Dillion Ranked Fourth Among Medium Sized Companies in 2016 OCBJ Best Places to Work List

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    PAGA Right of Action Not Applicable to Construction Workers Under Collective Bargaining Agreement
    Corporate Profile

    NAPOLEON INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and claims related expert witness designations, the Napoleon, Indiana Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with regional assets which comprise licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Napoleon and the surrounding areas.

    Napoleon Indiana engineering expert witnessNapoleon Indiana testifying construction expert witnessNapoleon Indiana architectural engineering expert witnessNapoleon Indiana construction cost estimating expert witnessNapoleon Indiana construction expert witness public projectsNapoleon Indiana engineering consultantNapoleon Indiana construction scheduling expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Napoleon, Indiana

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

    October 06, 2026 —
    Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

    Underlying Complaint Alleges Possibility of Coverage, Triggering Duty to Defend

    September 15, 2026 —
    In a dispute among insurers for various defendants in the underlying case regarding the providing of a defense, the Second Circuit vacated, in part, the district court’s judgment and remanded the case. New Your Marine and Gen. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 18087 (2nd Cir. June 23, 2026). Mary Guzman, who worked for a cleaning company, PBM, LLC, alleged that she was injured when a glass panel in a revolving door fell onto her as she cleaned the door. She filed suit in state court against the owners of the building as well as the lessee of the fifteenth floor where the accident occurred, Bank of New York Mellon (Bank). She alleged the owners and the Bank were negligent in creating the dangerous condition that caused her injury. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    April 27, 2026 —
    A $16.9-million claim for work on a hospital addition by a joint venture of contractors Modern Building Co. and Sundt Construction is stuck and delayed indefinitely following the California hospital's December bankruptcy filing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Can Anything Supersede Excel in AEC?

    April 27, 2026 —
    If there’s one piece of software that dominates the business world across industries, it’s Microsoft Excel. Can AI finally dethrone the mighty spreadsheet? Memorable Spreadsheet Moments Everyone has memorable spreadsheet moments. I have a few. For example, my then-architecture firm was involved in more than a dozen housing developments abroad. I developed an Excel workbook that took the required number of households as input and automatically generated a breakdown of buildings and their apartment types for AutoCAD. This was urban planning and architectural design done with a spreadsheet. I also developed business software using Excel for project portfolio management. The prototype was later scaled into a commercial SaaS that is now used globally. Another memorable moment was when a property owner told me their Excel file grew so large that it ran out of rows and columns. That must have been before 2007, when the maximum number of columns on a sheet was still just 256 and the maximum number of rows was 65,536. The current limits are 1,048,576 rows and 16,384 columns, which I hope no one will exceed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...