BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness New Goshen Indiana custom homes expert witness New Goshen Indiana custom home expert witness New Goshen Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness New Goshen Indiana structural steel construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana landscaping construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana multi family housing expert witness New Goshen Indiana condominiums expert witness New Goshen Indiana tract home expert witness New Goshen Indiana production housing expert witness New Goshen Indiana retail construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana industrial building expert witness New Goshen Indiana high-rise construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana hospital construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana Medical building expert witness New Goshen Indiana townhome construction expert witness New Goshen Indiana condominium expert witness New Goshen Indiana parking structure expert witness New Goshen Indiana office building expert witness New Goshen Indiana casino resort expert witness New Goshen Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness New Goshen Indiana institutional building expert witness New Goshen Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    New Goshen, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines New Goshen Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Madison County Chapter
    Local # 1504
    853 E. Southern Avenue
    Indianapolis, IN 46203


    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244
    http://www.bagi.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org

    Home Builders Association of Gtr Terre Haute
    Local # 1582
    2747 Sidenbender Rd
    Terre Haute, IN 47802
    http://www.hbaterrehaute.com

    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Southeastern Indiana chapter
    Local # 1536
    394 W County Road 400 N
    Greensburg, IN 47240


    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For New Goshen Indiana

    After Restoring Power in North Carolina, Contractor Faces Many Claims

    Building a Strong ESG Program Can Fuel Growth and Reduce Company Risk

    Government Claiming Contract Is Void Ab Initio by Contractor Knowingly Making False Statements

    Guessing as to your Construction Damages is Not the Best Approach

    "Resilient Rebuild Hub" Helps Wildfire-Impacted Homeowners Build Back Stronger

    Macron Visits Notre Dame 2 Years After Devastating Fire

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    Is Your Design Professional Construction Contract too Friendly? (Law Note)

    Commencing of the Statute of Repose for Construction Defects

    Making the Construction Industry a Safer place for Women

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    New York Court Rules on Architect's Duty Under Contract and Tort Principles

    San Diego Developer Strikes Out on “Disguised Taking” Claim

    Naples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford It

    Fifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case

    Underpowered AC Not a Construction Defect

    Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Claims: Factors to Consider

    Business Risk Exclusion Dooms Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    Outer Banks Homes Collapsing Is Just a Taste of What’s to Come

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds Insurer Estopped From Denying Coverage Where Declaratory Judgment Suit Filed Too Late

    EPA Fines Ivory Homes for Storm Water Pollution

    Zillow Seen Dominating U.S. Home Searches with Trulia

    In Personal Injury Actions, Prejudgment Interest on Costs Not Recoverable

    Utah’s Emerging Framework for Responsible Data Center Development

    Sixth Circuit Rejects Claim for Reverse Bad Faith

    Reporting Requirements for Architects under California Business and Professions Code Section 5588

    Scary Movie: Theatre Developer Axed By Court of Appeal In Prevailing Wage Determination Challenge

    Michigan Claims Engineers’ Errors Prolonged Corrosion

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/18/23) – Zillow’s New Pilot Program, Production Begins at Solar Panel Plant in Georgia, and More Diversity on Contracts for Buffalo Bills Stadium

    A New Tariffs Twist: Aggressive Enforcement of False Claims Act Violations Could Potentially Trip Up Construction Companies

    Recent Third Circuit OSHA Decision Sounds Alarm for Employers and Their Officers

    Creeping Incrementalism in Downstream Insurance: Carriers are Stretching Standard CGL Concepts to Untenable Limits

    Contractor Covered for Voluntary Remediation Efforts in Completed Homes

    A Win for Policyholders: Court Finds Flood Exclusion Inapplicable to Plumbing Leaks Caused by Hurricane Rainfall

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Last, but NOT Least: Why You Should Take a Closer Look at Your Next Indemnification Clause

    Kansas Man Caught for Construction Scam in Virginia

    Seattle Independent Contractor Ordinance – Pitfalls for Unwary Construction Professionals

    Basement Foundation Systems’ Getting an Overhaul

    Look Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble Panels

    Is it time for a summer tune-up?

    Judicial Panel Denies Nationwide Consolidation of COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases

    Are We Headed for a Work Shortage?

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities

    Bidders Shortlisted as Oroville Dam Work Schedule is Set

    Maybe Supervising Qualifies as Labor After All

    1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims

    Avoid a Derailed Settlement in Construction

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”
    Corporate Profile

    NEW GOSHEN INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction claims related expert witness designations, the New Goshen, Indiana Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the New Goshen construction industry.

    New Goshen Indiana building code compliance expert witnessNew Goshen Indiana contractor expert witnessNew Goshen Indiana defective construction expertNew Goshen Indiana civil engineer expert witnessNew Goshen Indiana construction forensic expert witnessNew Goshen Indiana forensic architectNew Goshen Indiana construction project management expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    New Goshen, Indiana

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois