BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness North Salem Indiana retail construction expert witness North Salem Indiana industrial building expert witness North Salem Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness North Salem Indiana casino resort expert witness North Salem Indiana townhome construction expert witness North Salem Indiana landscaping construction expert witness North Salem Indiana Medical building expert witness North Salem Indiana custom home expert witness North Salem Indiana parking structure expert witness North Salem Indiana production housing expert witness North Salem Indiana custom homes expert witness North Salem Indiana structural steel construction expert witness North Salem Indiana low-income housing expert witness North Salem Indiana condominiums expert witness North Salem Indiana hospital construction expert witness North Salem Indiana housing expert witness North Salem Indiana condominium expert witness North Salem Indiana high-rise construction expert witness North Salem Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness North Salem Indiana office building expert witness North Salem Indiana multi family housing expert witness North Salem Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    North Salem, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines North Salem Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org

    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244
    http://www.bagi.com

    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362


    Madison County Chapter
    Local # 1504
    853 E. Southern Avenue
    Indianapolis, IN 46203


    East Central Indiana Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1556
    PO Box 1072
    Muncie, IN 47308


    Home Builders Association of Gtr Terre Haute
    Local # 1582
    2747 Sidenbender Rd
    Terre Haute, IN 47802
    http://www.hbaterrehaute.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For North Salem Indiana

    Construction is the Fastest Growing Industry in California

    Rise in Single-Family Construction Anticipated in Michigan

    Wichita Condo Association Files Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Construction Defects not Creating Problems for Bay Bridge

    Florida Condos Bet on Americans Making 50% Down Payments

    Jason Feld Awarded Volunteer of the Year by Claims & Litigation Management Alliance

    Cameron Kalunian to Speak at Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Contractor Gets Benched After Failing to Pay Jury Fees

    California Case Adds Difficulties for Contractors & Material Suppliers

    Number of Occurrences Depends on Who is Sued

    Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints

    "Repair Work" Endorsements and Punch List Work

    PA Superior Court Provides Clarification on Definition of CGL “Occurrence” When Property Damage Is Caused by Faulty Building Conditions

    Three Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018

    Claims Against Broker Dismissed

    Delaware Supreme Court Won’t Halt Building

    Traub Lieberman Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Wins Summary Judgment

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    U.K. Construction Resumes Growth Amid Resurgent Housing Activity

    New Mexico Architect Is Tuned Into His State

    When to Withhold Retention Payments on Private or Public Projects

    Prefabrication Contract Considerations

    Planned Everglades Reservoir at Center of Spat Between Fla.'s Gov.-Elect, Water Management District

    New Jersey Imposes New Apprenticeship Training Requirements

    Bad Welds Doom Art Installation at Central Park

    Thank You for 14 Consecutive Years of Legal Elite Elections

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    $400M Tunnel Project Faces Scrutiny from Nashville Leaders

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    When Can Customers Sue for Delays?

    Las Vegas Partner Sarah Odia Named a 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyer Rising Star

    Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review Regarding Necessary Parties in Lien Foreclosure Actions

    Breaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In California

    One More Thing Moving From California to Texas: Wildfire Risk

    New Strategy for Deterring Intracorporate Litigation?: Delaware Supreme Court Supports Fee-Shifting Bylaws

    Could This Gel Help Tame the California Fires?

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 2 – Procedural Due Process

    Transplants Send Nashville Home Market Upwards

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Confirms Carrier Owes No Duty to Defend Against Claims for Faulty Workmanship

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Designers Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse Fallout

    An Obligation to Provide Notice and an Opportunity to Cure May not End after Termination, and Why an Early Offer of Settlement Should Be Considered on Public Works Contracts

    Engineering, Architecture, and Modern Technology – An Interview with Dr. Jakob Strømann-Andersen

    Bidder Be Thoughtful: The Impacts of Disclaimers in Pre-Bid Reports

    Insurers' Communications Through Brokers Not Privileged

    Graham & Who May Trigger The Need To Protest

    Structural Engineer Found Liable for Defects that Rendered a Condominium Dangerously Unsafe

    Disgruntled Online Reviews of Attorney by Disgruntled Former Client Ordered Removed from Yelp.com

    Suit Against Broker Untimely Filed
    Corporate Profile

    NORTH SALEM INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the North Salem, Indiana Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to North Salem and the surrounding areas.

    North Salem Indiana expert witnesses fenestrationNorth Salem Indiana testifying construction expert witnessNorth Salem Indiana slope failure expert witnessNorth Salem Indiana construction forensic expert witnessNorth Salem Indiana contractor expert witnessNorth Salem Indiana delay claim expert witnessNorth Salem Indiana engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    North Salem, Indiana

    373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    October 06, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years. “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    One Year In: A Look at the Initial Impacts of LEED v5 on the Built Environment

    October 20, 2026 —
    As federal climate policies shift, the built environment has entered a period of uncertainty where developers, designers and owners need to find pragmatic, forward-looking approaches to sustainability. A year after its launch on April 28, 2025, LEED v5 is helping lead that charge by pushing the industry toward a stronger long-term focus on carbon reduction, climate resilience and building performance. The framework of this certification provides a snapshot of the current state of the industry and an indication of where it may be headed in the future. LEED v5’s introduction has helped to begin reframing and informing the approaches of both mission-driven and cost-conscious clients, providing a framework to align their decisions more closely with sustainable priorities by emphasizing carbon reduction, energy efficiency and electrification. These standards can help teams make investments strategically by phasing in upgrades, planning for future technologies and demonstrating how the rating system is influencing long-term decision-making across projects. Reprinted courtesy of Eric Haggstrom, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

    October 06, 2026 —
    Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Dotted Line: How Construction Is Dealing with Cybersecurity in the Age of AI

    October 12, 2026 —
    Richard R. Volack, Partner in P&A’s New York office and Chair of the firm’s Cyber Security & Data Privacy practice, was recently quoted in “Dotted Line: How Construction Is Dealing with Cybersecurity in the Age of AI,” an article written by Construction Dive. The article examines how contractors’ increasing reliance on interconnected technologies and AI can make cyberattacks more sophisticated. It discusses the heightened risks for government contractors and smaller subcontractors, including the potential exposure of sensitive project information, personal data, and financial records. It also explores practical measures contractors can take to mitigate these risks, such as strengthening contractual protections, conducting penetration testing, obtaining appropriate cyber insurance, implementing multifactor authentication, and providing employees with regular cybersecurity training. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC
    Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com