BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana custom home expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana parking structure expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana housing expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana retail construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana condominium expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana townhome construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana institutional building expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana casino resort expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana condominiums expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana office building expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana hospital construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana custom homes expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana low-income housing expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana tract home expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana production housing expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana multi family housing expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Rolling Prairie Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rolling Prairie, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rolling Prairie Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of St Joseph Valley
    Local # 1578
    105 E Grove St
    Mishawaka, IN 46545
    http://www.hbasjv.com

    Builders Association of Northeast IN
    Local # 1572
    PO Box 861
    Angola, IN 46703
    http://www.ba-ni.com

    Builders Association of Laporte County
    Local # 1534
    2626 N S R 39
    La Porte, IN 46350
    http://www.balc.org

    Builders Association of Elkhart Co
    Local # 1512
    25428 County Road 20
    Elkhart, IN 46517
    http://www.ba-ec.com

    Home Builders Association of Northwest Indiana
    Local # 1564
    1356 W Lincolnway
    Valparaiso, IN 46385
    http://www.pcbaonline.com

    Marshall Co Chapter
    Local # 1554
    PO Box 464
    Plymouth, IN 46563


    Builders Association of Kosciusko-Fulton Counties
    Local # 1541
    313 S Buffalo St Suite B
    Warsaw, IN 46580
    http://www.bakfc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rolling Prairie Indiana

    Canada Home Resales Post First Fall in Eight Months

    'Right to Repair' and Fixing Equipment in a Digital Age

    Texas Court Requires Insurer to Defend GC Despite Breach of Contract Exclusion

    Gene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation Team

    Just Because You Label It A “Trade Secret” Does Not Make It A “Trade Secret”

    EEOC Chair Issues New Report “Building for the Future: Advancing Equal Employment Opportunity in the Construction Industry”

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into Georgia

    Colorado homebuilders target low-income buyers with bogus "affordable housing" bill

    Updates to AIA Contract Applications

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment Form Used in California Construction

    The Value of Photographic Evidence in Construction Litigation

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    Home Improvement in U.S. Slowing or Still Intact -- Which Is It?

    Recent Developments with California’s Right to Repair Act

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Critical Updates in Builders Risk Claim Recovery: Staying Ahead of the "Satisfactory State" Argument and Getting the Most Out of LEG 3

    US-Mexico Border Wall Bids Include Tourist Attraction, Solar Panels

    Ex-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction Bribes

    Four HHMR Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of Best Lawyers®

    The Relevance and Reasonableness of Destructive Testing

    California Plant Would Convert Wood Waste Into Hydrogen Fuel

    Reminder: In Court (as in life) the Worst Thing You Can Do Is Not Show Up

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    Settlement Reached in California Animal Shelter Construction Defect Case

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/2/25) – U.S. Banking’s CRE Exposure, Increased Insurance Challenges and an Embrace of AI by Construction Firms

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    EPA Grants Arizona Lead Over Underground Injection Control Program

    New Standard Addresses Wind Turbine Construction Safety Requirements and Identifies Hazards

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    New Jersey Judge Found Mortgage Lender Liable When Borrower Couldn’t Pay

    Suffolk Pauses $1.5B Boston Tower Project for Safety Audit After Fire

    Improper Classification Under Davis Bacon Can Be Costly

    2025 Construction Outlook: Growth, But Uneven in Certain Areas

    Pennsylvania Considers Changes to Construction Code Review

    Subrogation Insight: Expert Testimony Admissible Despite Post-Loss Repairs

    Kiewit and Two Ex-Managers Face Canada Jobsite Fatality Criminal Trial

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    No Conflict in Successive Representation of a Closely-Held Company and Its Insiders Where Insiders Already Possess Company’s Confidential Information

    Deck Police - The New Mandate for HOA's Takes Safety to the Next Level

    Professional Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Construction Context

    HHMR Recognized in 2026 Best Law Firms® Rankings for Construction Litigation and Construction Law

    Multiple Construction Errors Contributed to Mexico Subway Collapse

    Flow-Down Clauses Can Drown Your Project

    Agile Project Management in the Construction Industry

    A Tuesday With Lisa Colon

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision
    Corporate Profile

    ROLLING PRAIRIE INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Rolling Prairie, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Rolling Prairie and the surrounding areas.

    Rolling Prairie Indiana structural concrete expertRolling Prairie Indiana construction safety expertRolling Prairie Indiana hospital construction expert witnessRolling Prairie Indiana construction defect expert witnessRolling Prairie Indiana civil engineer expert witnessRolling Prairie Indiana delay claim expert witnessRolling Prairie Indiana expert witness commercial buildings
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Rolling Prairie, Indiana

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Utah’s Emerging Framework for Responsible Data Center Development

    September 08, 2026 —
    Utah is establishing itself as one of the nation’s most attractive jurisdictions for large-scale data center development, with a structured, defensible regulatory pathway that gives developers and investors the clarity needed to deploy capital at scale. The cornerstone is Executive Order 2026-03, “Establishing a Higher Bar for Data Center Development in Utah,” signed by Governor Spencer J. Cox on May 29, 2026. The Executive Order creates an actionable compliance framework letting developers demonstrate stewardship across water, air quality, energy, wildlife, and community engagement – reducing regulatory and reputational risk. Recent enactments on energy self-supply and water rights operationalize these principles, while a few counties have adopted short-term local moratoria to update zoning; understanding how these interact with the state framework matters for site selection. Reprinted courtesy of Denise A. Dragoo, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Miller, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Dragoo may be contacted at ddragoo@swlaw.com Mr. Miller may be contacted at jmiller@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    May 12, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel Ayushi Neogi has authored an article in the Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada’s Defense Comment magazine examining the shifting landscape of arbitration following the Ending Forced Arbitration Act. Titled “Compelling Arbitration in a Post-Ending Forced Arbitration Act, Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape,” the article analyzes how recent legislative changes are reshaping arbitration strategy, particularly as employees gain greater ability to bypass arbitration in certain claims. Neogi provides practical insight into how courts are responding and what this means for defense counsel navigating increasingly complex and plaintiff-friendly environments. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    July 06, 2026 —
    Our firm is proud to announce a decisive defense victory obtained by Partner Daniel Crespo and Associate Lauren Landau for our client in a high-exposure premises liability action arising from a 2022 incident at an active school construction site in Perris, California. On March 10, 2026, the Riverside County Superior Court granted Summary Judgment in full for our client, dismissing all claims brought by Plaintiff, who alleged she tripped and fell over a curb while picking up her daughter from school and sustained ankle and wrist injuries as a result. Through meticulous preparation and the strategic use of construction plans, contractual documents, and onsite surveillance video evidence, our team demonstrated that our client had no ownership, possession, or control over the portion of the existing sidewalk where the incident occurred, with construction plans unambiguously designating the area as pre-existing concrete outside our client’s scope of work, and the Construction Services Agreement expressly reserving control over all existing site improvements to the school district. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP