BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana parking structure expert witness Sandborn Indiana custom home expert witness Sandborn Indiana institutional building expert witness Sandborn Indiana Medical building expert witness Sandborn Indiana production housing expert witness Sandborn Indiana condominiums expert witness Sandborn Indiana low-income housing expert witness Sandborn Indiana housing expert witness Sandborn Indiana townhome construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana multi family housing expert witness Sandborn Indiana tract home expert witness Sandborn Indiana hospital construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana condominium expert witness Sandborn Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Sandborn Indiana retail construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Sandborn Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Sandborn Indiana custom homes expert witness Sandborn Indiana office building expert witness Sandborn Indiana industrial building expert witness Sandborn Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sandborn, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sandborn Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451


    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001


    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243


    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    http://www.mcbaindiana.org

    Vincennes Area Chapter
    Local # 1563
    PO Box 531
    Vincennes, IN 47591


    Jackson-Jennings Builders Association
    Local # 1574
    11990 W Mt Healthy Rd
    Columbus, IN 47201
    http://www.jjba.org

    Builders Association of Dubois County
    Local # 1511
    1813 S A St
    Jasper, IN 47546
    http://www.dcbuilder.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sandborn Indiana

    Policy's One Year Suit Limitation Does Not Apply to Challenging the Insurer's Claims Handling

    Condo Building Hits Highest Share of Canada Market Since 1971

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    The Colorado Supreme Court holds that loans made to a construction company are not subject to the Mechanic’s Lien Trust Fund Statute

    Mortgage Battle Flares as U.K. Homebuying Loses Allure

    Atlanta Hawks Billionaire Owner Plans $5 Billion Downtown Transformation

    Los Angeles Wildfires to Impact Profitability of US Property Insurers, Says GlobalData

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    Client Alert: California’s Unfair Competition Law (B&P §17200) Preempted by Federal Workplace Safety Law

    Insurer Must Pay Portions of Arbitration Award Related to Faulty Workmanship

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Happy New Year from CDJ

    Deferred Maintenance?

    'Perfect Storm' Caused Fractures at San Francisco Transit Hub

    CC&Rs Not the Place for Arbitration Agreement, Court Rules

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    Insurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    As Natural Gas Expands in Gulf, Residents Fear Rising Damage

    The Cheap and Easy Climate Fix That Can Cool the Planet Fast

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Fraud, the VCPA and Construction Contracts

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    Newmeyer & Dillion Ranked Fourth Among Medium Sized Companies in 2016 OCBJ Best Places to Work List

    Quick Note: Procure Worker’s Compensation in the Name of Your Company If You Are a General Contractor

    Agreement Authorizing Party’s Own Engineer to Determine Substantial Compliance Found Binding on Adverse Party

    Interior Designer Licensure

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT THE RIGHT TO REPAIR ACT (SB800) IS THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS NOT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURIES WHETHER OR NOT THE UNDERLYING DEFECTS GAVE RISE TO ANY PROPERTY DAMAGE in McMillin Albany LL

    Lewis Brisbois Successfully Concludes Privacy Dispute for Comedian Kathy Griffin Following Calif. Supreme Court Denial of Review

    Rattlesnake Bite Triggers Potential Liability for Walmart

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    Texas Mechanic’s Lien Law Update: New Law Brings a Little Relief for Subcontractors and a Lot of Relief for Design Professionals

    Colorado’s Housing Crisis: How S.B. 25-131 Could Be a Step in the Right Direction

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    Home insurance perks for green-friendly design (guest post)

    Summary Findings of the Fourth National Climate Assessment

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Buyer's Demolishing of Insured's Home Not Barred by Faulty Construction Exclusion

    What I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ Perspective

    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Builder’s Be Wary of Insurance Policies that Provide No Coverage for Building: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co v. Creek Side at Parker HOA

    Compass, Zillow Take Feud Over Home Listings Into NYC Court

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian Claims

    $17B Agreement Streamlines Disney World Development Plans

    Contractors’ Right to Sue in Washington Requires Registration

    Merger to Create Massive Los Angeles Construction Firm
    Corporate Profile

    SANDBORN INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction claims related expert witness designations, the Sandborn, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house personnel which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Sandborn and the surrounding areas.

    Sandborn Indiana delay claim expert witnessSandborn Indiana architectural expert witnessSandborn Indiana construction cost estimating expert witnessSandborn Indiana forensic architectSandborn Indiana roofing construction expertSandborn Indiana structural concrete expertSandborn Indiana construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sandborn, Indiana

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    April 14, 2026 —
    A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
    A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
    “The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
    “[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
    Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Can Foreclosure Sale Be Overturned Because Sale Price Is Grossly Inadequate?

    January 26, 2026 —
    Foreclosure actions are equity actions. See Verzura Construction, Inc. v. Hotel La Petitite Muse, LLC, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2500a (Fla. 3d DCA 2025). Can a sale price at a foreclosure auction sale be set aside because the foreclosed party believes the sale price is grossly inadequate? A recent case discusses this question and, as you will see, the argument that the sale price is grossly inadequate is not enough to overturn a sale. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    April 14, 2026 —
    During my involvement in designing mobile phone production facilities, the speed of design and construction was critical. Any delay could directly translate into lost revenue. That same logic now applies to data centers, though the stakes are much higher. Instead of optimizing physical production lines, we are constructing infrastructure for digital production. The global data center capacity is expected to nearly double by 2030, and with this level of demand, the traditional project-by-project delivery model begins to show its limitations. Data centers are no longer isolated projects in the traditional sense. They are evolving into repeatable, scalable production systems, making them ideal environments for AEC process and business model innovation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    February 10, 2026 —
    In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The 2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue. On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Don’t Hire Me! (Principle Is Expensive, and Lawsuits Based on Principle Are Even More Expensive)

    February 10, 2026 —
    I spend a lot of time trying to convince my clients to NOT hire me. I’m not crazy—let me explain. Litigation is costly. Very costly. And it is time consuming. Don’t get me wrong—I will go to Court and fight just as hard as you want me to, but I want you to know what you are facing before you go down that road. Now, obviously, if you are the one that is being sued, you have no choice but to defend yourself and your Firm. But if you are considering suing someone else, think long and hard about it before you pull the trigger. There are ways to reduce cost, time, and risk: for example, pre-suit or early mediation, or agreeing to arbitration in lieu of trial. But I always want my clients to know that real law is not like Law & Order. Things take time. A trial is often a year or more away from when you first file the lawsuit. Make your decisions on not just your heart, but your economic brain as well. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    February 10, 2026 —
    Quick Take On January 23, 2026, one year after the Los Angeles wildfires, the President issued Executive Order 14377 directing the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to consider regulations that would preempt state and local permitting requirements for federally funded reconstruction projects in the Pacific Palisades and Eaton Canyon areas. The Order mandates expedited federal environmental and historic preservation reviews, directs the development of legislative proposals, and orders an audit of California’s use of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HGMP) funding. Key Provisions Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting The Order directs FEMA and the SBA to consider promulgating regulations that would preempt state or local permitting processes found to have “unduly impeded” the timely use of federal emergency-relief funds by homeowners, businesses, or houses of worship seeking to rebuild. Under the proposed framework, preempted permitting regimes would be replaced with a self-certification requirement, whereby builders would certify to a federal designee that they have complied with all applicable substantive state and local health and safety standards. FEMA would retain authority to review all repairs and construction for compliance with applicable health and safety standards. Proposed regulations must be published within 30 days, with final regulations due within 90 days. Reprinted courtesy of Olivia LaCasto, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Schneiderman, Snell & Wilmer Ms. LaCasto may be contacted at olacasto@swlaw.com Mr. Schneiderman may be contacted at jschneiderman@swlaw.com Read the full story...