BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Upland Indiana custom homes expert witness Upland Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Upland Indiana townhome construction expert witness Upland Indiana office building expert witness Upland Indiana multi family housing expert witness Upland Indiana tract home expert witness Upland Indiana condominium expert witness Upland Indiana custom home expert witness Upland Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Upland Indiana retail construction expert witness Upland Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Upland Indiana industrial building expert witness Upland Indiana Medical building expert witness Upland Indiana casino resort expert witness Upland Indiana low-income housing expert witness Upland Indiana production housing expert witness Upland Indiana housing expert witness Upland Indiana condominiums expert witness Upland Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Upland Indiana parking structure expert witness Upland Indiana hospital construction expert witness Upland Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Upland, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Upland Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Greater Lafayette
    Local # 1548
    PO Box 5795
    Lafayette, IN 47903
    http://www.bagl.info

    Home Builders Association of Howard County Inc
    Local # 1532
    PO Box 1187
    Kokomo, IN 46903
    http://www.hbahowardco.com

    East Central Indiana Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1556
    PO Box 1072
    Muncie, IN 47308


    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362


    Home Builders Association of Fort Wayne
    Local # 1528
    305 W Main St
    Fort Wayne, IN 46802
    http://www.hbafortwayne.com

    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Upland Indiana

    Puerto Rico Grid Restoration Plagued by Historic Problems, New Challenges

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    More on the VCPA and Construction

    Following Mishaps, D.C. Metro Presses on With Repairs

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Apparently, It’s Not Always Who You Know”

    Consultant’s Corner: Why Should Construction Business Owners Care about Cyber Liability Insurance?

    Vietnam Expands Arrests in Coffee Region Property Probe

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in EEOC Subpoena Case

    Investigation of Orange County Landslide

    Downtown Sacramento Building Riddled with Defects

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    Landmark Towers Association, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.A. or: One Bad Apple Spoils the Whole Bunch

    Contractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe Weather

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Flood Coverage Denied Based on Failure to Submit Proof of Loss

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 38 White and Williams Lawyers

    OSHA Issues COVID-19 Guidance for Construction Industry

    Construction’s AI Moment — Why Contractors Are Increasingly Optimistic

    Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend When Case Law is Uncertain

    Alexis Crump Receives 2020 Lawyer Monthly Women in Law Award

    SIGAR Report Finds +$15 Billion in “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” in Afghanistan

    Construction Client Advisory: The Power of the Bonded Stop Notice Extends to Expended Construction Funds

    COVID-19 Is Not Direct Physical Loss Or Damage

    Developer Sues TVA After It Halts Nuke Site Sale

    When Is a Project Delay Material and Actionable?

    Federal District Court Finds Coverage Barred Because of Lack of Allegations of Damage During the Policy Period and Because of Late Notice

    Appraisal Process Analyzed

    Repair of Fractured Girders Complete at Shuttered Salesforce Transit Center

    Assignment of Claim not Precluded by Policy’s Anti-Assignment Clause

    Coverage Denied for Insured's Defective Product

    Super Lawyers Selects Haight Lawyers for Its 2024 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Lewis Brisbois Promotes 35 to Partnership

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    David M. McLain, Esq. to Speak at the 2014 CLM Claims College

    Middle District of Florida Disregards Other Insurance Clause Where Subcontractor Contractually Promised to Indemnify General Contractor

    The First UK Hospital Being Built Using AI Technology

    McDermott International and BP Team Arbitrate $535M LNG Site Dispute

    The Cheapest Place to Buy a House in the Hamptons

    Hake Law Attorneys Join National Law Firm Wilson Elser

    Toolbox Talk Series: GenAI Document Review

    50 State Matrices | 2026 Edition

    N.J. Governor Fires Staff at Authority Roiled by Patronage Hires

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    California Imposes New Disabled Access Obligations on Commercial Property Owners

    Congratulations to Partner John O’Meara for Being Named as One of America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators for Three Consecutive Years!

    Power to the Office Worker
    Corporate Profile

    UPLAND INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Upland, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Upland and the surrounding areas.

    Upland Indiana window expert witnessUpland Indiana civil engineering expert witnessUpland Indiana construction expert witness consultantUpland Indiana testifying construction expert witnessUpland Indiana architecture expert witnessUpland Indiana eifs expert witnessUpland Indiana consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Upland, Indiana

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    New York Construction: New Rules for Reporting and Cancellation Pay

    October 12, 2026 —
    Effective December 8, 2026, covered New York construction employers generally must provide up to four hours of reporting pay when an employee reports for a scheduled shift but receives no work, and two hours of pay when a scheduled shift is canceled with less than 12 hours’ notice. Separate requirements apply to certain prevailing-wage construction projects. Before the law takes effect, contractors should identify which projects and employees are covered and make sure their scheduling, payroll, labor, and contract practices are ready. What the New Law Requires New York’s Construction Reporting Pay Act introduces two principal compensation requirements for covered construction employees:
    • Reporting pay: An employee who reports for a scheduled shift but is not provided work generally must receive up to four hours of pay.
    • Shift-cancellation pay: An employee generally must receive two hours of pay when a scheduled shift is canceled with less than 12 hours’ notice.
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth and Howard Wexler, Seyfarth Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com Mr. Wexler may be contacted at hwexler@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Your AI Tool Could Be Your Next Breach of Contract

    October 20, 2026 —
    Like many industries, the construction industry is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence. AI-powered tools now help construction teams estimate costs, transcribe meetings, summarize RFIs, model schedules, and manage project documents faster than ever before. But amid this rush toward efficiency, a serious risk hides in plain sight: every time project documents are uploaded into a third-party AI tool, contractual confidentiality obligations may be implicated — or outright breached — exposing companies to potentially substantial and uncapped liability. General contractors often face strict confidentiality and nondisclosure obligations, whether under the prime construction contract or a separate NDA. This is especially true for complex projects or those involving proprietary technology — such as data centers, medical or scientific facilities, and energy generation and storage facilities. These confidentiality clauses typically define “confidential information” broadly to encompass all non-public information provided for the project, including plans, specifications, pricing, schedules, RFPs, and even the contract terms themselves. These confidentiality obligations almost always flow down to subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Laurie Choi, Snell & Wilmer and Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Choi may be contacted at lchoi@swlaw.com Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Court Finds Potential Conflicts In Denying Insurer’s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Independent Counsel

    October 12, 2026 —
    The District Court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the additional insured’s claim that the appointment of independent counsel was required. S. Cal. Edison Co. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co of Am., 2025 U.S. DIst. LEXIS 148495 (C.D Calif. July 15, 2025). Southern California Edison Company (SCE) entered a Master Services Agreement with its contractor, SASCO whereby SASCO agreed to provide services concerning electrical pole repair and replacement. SASCO was required to obtain primary and excess general liability policies and to name SCE as an additional insured. SASCO obtained such policies from Travelers, naming SCE as an additional insured. The policies limited coverage for SCE to covered damages arising from SASCO’s work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com