White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation
July 27, 2026 —
Craig O'Neill, Lindsay Liebman, Kristen Nichols Wright, Zachary Roth & William Taylor - White and WilliamsWhite and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia.
To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year.
Reprinted courtesy of
Craig O'Neill, White and Williams,
Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams,
Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams,
Zachary Roth, White and Williams and
William Taylor, White and Williams
Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
“The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough
June 02, 2026 —
Andrew Lintner - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogIn construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative.
At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise.
Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMr. Lintner may be contacted at
alintner@hhmrlaw.com
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com
Read the full story...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions
September 29, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiReversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer, the Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed on whether ensuing losses as defined in the policy were covered. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Ropicky, 2026 Wisc. LEXIS 302 (Wis. July 7, 2026).
The insured suffered damage during a storm on May 11, 2018, when rainwater poured into the home. The insureds gave notice to their insurer, Cincinnati. Upon inspection, Cincinnati determined that water intrusion resulted from multiple construction defects in the home. In the front of the home, water entered through a gap in the stone veneer. The inspector also concluded that the damage from rainwater was not just from the May 11, 2018, storm, but damage had occurred from prior storm events.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'
September 08, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisBest Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants).
Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America
here.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Newmeyer Dillion Partner Jeff Masters Recognized by Chambers USA for Representation of Insurance Policyholders
June 08, 2026 —
Newmeyer DillionNEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – June 4, 2026 – Newmeyer Dillion is proud to announce that litigation partner Jeffrey D. Masters has been ranked among a select group of California lawyers representing insurance policyholders in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA.
This marks two consecutive years of recognition for Masters by this prestigious international attorney rating resource.
"This recognition by Chambers and Partners is a testament to Jeff’s dedication to our clients," said Managing Partner, Paul Tetzloff. "We are thrilled to see his hard work acknowledged and the level of passion and care that he delivers to clients fully recognized."
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Newmeyer Dillion
The Firm Turns 16!
July 20, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsI have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of
my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at
The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want.
Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wi
Trial Court's Award of Contractual Fees to Public Adjuster OverturnedHow AI and Machine Learning Are Helping Construction Reduce Risk and Improve MarginsCalifornia Committee Hosts a Hearing on Deadly Berkeley Balcony CollapseVallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations Back Posting with Thoughts on Lien WaiversSuper Lawyers Selects Haight’s Melvin Marcia for Its 2023 Northern California Rising Stars ListMeet BWB&O’s 2025 Best Lawyers in America!Beverly Hills Voters Reject Plan for Enclave's Tallest BuildingJarred Reed Named to the National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List for Second Consecutive YearA Funny Thing Happened to My Ground Lease in Bankruptcy CourtSafety Officials Investigating Death From FallProperty Damage to Non-Defective Work Is CoveredColorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” StandardCourt of Appeals Discusses the Difference Between “Claims-Made” and “Occurrence-Based” Insurance PoliciesConstruction Law Alert: Concrete Supplier Botches Concrete Mix, Gets Thrashed By Court of Appeal for Trying to Blame Third PartyOregon Construction Firm Sued for Construction DefectsIs an Initial Decision Maker, Project Neutral, or Dispute Resolution Board Right for You?Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in ConnecticutIt’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do ItHousing Inventory Might be Distorted by Pocket ListingsConstruction Projects and Subrogation: Timing is EverythingNomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in AmericaA Lawyer's Perspective on Current Issues Dominating the Construction IndustryHawaii Appellate Court Finds Duty to Defend Group Builders CaseBridging Documents and Design-Build Warranties: Building Bridges to Avoid PitfallsGive Way or Yield? The Jurisdiction of Your Contract Does Matter! (Law note)Orchestrating Bias: Arbitrator’s Undisclosed Membership in Philharmonic Group with Pauly Shore’s Attorney Not Grounds to Reverse Award in Real Estate DisputeOSHA Reinforces COVID Guidelines for the WorkplaceNew ConsensusDocs 242 Design Professional Change Order Form Helps Facilitate Compensation for Changes in Design ServicesDispute Among Joint Venture Partners and Joint Venture AgreementGeorgia Federal Court Says Fact Questions Exist As To Whether Nitrogen Is An “Irritant” or “Contaminant” As Used in Pollution ExclusionVirtual Jury Trials: The Next Wave of Remote Legal PracticeReturn-to-Workplace Checklist: Considerations and Emerging Best Practices for EmployersBig News for “Smaller” Construction CasesFifth Circuit Certifies Questions to Texas Supreme Court on Concurrent Causation DoctrineInsurer Defends Denial in Property Coverage Dispute Involving Marijuana Growing OperationsSouth Adams County Water and Sanitation District Takes Proactive Step to Treat PFAS, Safeguard Water SuppliesContractor Not Liable for Flooding HouseIRMI Expert Commentary: NY Highest Court Confronts Downstream Risk Transfer for Subcontractor Bodily Injury ClaimsAlleged Damage to Personal Property Does Not Revive Coverage for Construction DefectsVallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: The Colorado Court of Appeals’ Decision Protecting a Declarant’s Right to Arbitration in Construction Defect CasesData Is Critical for the Future of ConstructionNew Nafta Could Settle Canada-U.S. Lumber War, Resolute CEO SaysFive Construction Payment Issues—and SolutionsOne Word Makes All The Difference – The Distinction Between “Pay If Paid” and “Pay When Paid” ClausesCalifornia Supreme Court Holds that Requirement of Prejudice for Late Notice Defense is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State for Choice of Law Analysis"Over? Did You Say 'Over'?" Determining the Preclusive Effect of an Earlier Arbitration AwardJobsite Safety Should Be Every Contractors' PriorityBall Janik LLP Elevates Construction Litigation Attorneys Keegan A. Berry and Nicholas B. Vargo to Partner Housing Bill Threatened by Rift on Help for DisadvantagedCaterpillar Said to Be Focus of Senate Overseas Tax ProbeLeonard Fadeeff v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyChambers USA 2023 Recognizes Six Partners and Three Practices at Lewis BrisboisHome Prices Up, Inventory DownTransition Study a Condo Board’s First Defense against Construction DefectsSupreme Court Holds That Prevailing Wage Statute is ConstitutionalSubcontractors Essential to Home Building IndustryThe Best Lawyers in America© Peer Review Names Eight Newmeyer & Dillion Partners in Multiple Categories and Two Partners as Orange County’s Lawyers of the Year in Construction and Insurance LawIs the Sky Actually Falling (on Green Building)?Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy‘Hallelujah,’ House Finally Approves $1T Infrastructure Funding PackageDeadline Nears for “Green Performance Bond” ImplementationCalifornia Ranks As Leading State for Green Building in 2022Steven L. Heisdorffer Joins Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell California Contractors Get a Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens the Harsh Consequences of Contractor License Lapses
