BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Westphalia Indiana industrial building expert witness Westphalia Indiana custom home expert witness Westphalia Indiana condominiums expert witness Westphalia Indiana condominium expert witness Westphalia Indiana parking structure expert witness Westphalia Indiana Medical building expert witness Westphalia Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana office building expert witness Westphalia Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Westphalia Indiana production housing expert witness Westphalia Indiana hospital construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana low-income housing expert witness Westphalia Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana institutional building expert witness Westphalia Indiana casino resort expert witness Westphalia Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Westphalia Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana townhome construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana retail construction expert witness Westphalia Indiana custom homes expert witness Westphalia Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Westphalia, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Westphalia Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451


    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243


    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001


    Vincennes Area Chapter
    Local # 1563
    PO Box 531
    Vincennes, IN 47591


    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401
    http://www.mcbaindiana.org

    Jackson-Jennings Builders Association
    Local # 1574
    11990 W Mt Healthy Rd
    Columbus, IN 47201
    http://www.jjba.org

    Builders Association of Dubois County
    Local # 1511
    1813 S A St
    Jasper, IN 47546
    http://www.dcbuilder.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Westphalia Indiana

    Wildfire Threats Make Utilities Uninsurable in US West

    Seeking Better Peer Reviews After the FIU Bridge Collapse

    Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act

    Tall and Sustainable Is Not an Easy Fix

    Town Sues over Defective Work on Sewer Lines

    Insurance Policy’s “No Voluntary Payment” Clauses Lose Some Bite in Colorado

    Safety Guidance for the Prevention of the Coronavirus on Construction Sites

    Another Defect Found on the Bay Bridge: Water Leakage

    Just Decided – New Jersey Supreme Court: Insurers Can Look To Extrinsic Evidence To Deny a Defense

    Construction Defect Disputes: Know Your Measure of Damages!!!!!

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    Floating Crane on Job in NYC's East River Has a Storied Past of Cold War Intrigue

    These Are the 13 Cities Where Millennials Can't Afford a Home

    Undercover Sting Nabs Eleven Illegal Contractors in California

    Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- A Wrap Up

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Is Safety Compliance Putting Your Project in Jeopardy? Examining the Essentials of DOE’s Worker Safety and Health Program

    Moving Toward a Telework Future: A Checklist of Considerations for Employers

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jonathan Harwood Wins Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer

    Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court

    Lessons from the Sept. 19 Mexico Earthquake

    AB 3018: Amendments to the Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements on California Public Projects

    A Contractual Liability Exclusion Doesn't Preclude Insurer's Duty to Indemnify

    California Supreme Court Raises the Bar on Dangerous Conditions on Public Property Claims

    The Status of OSHA’s Impending Heat Stress Standard

    Just Because You Label It A “Trade Secret” Does Not Make It A “Trade Secret”

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Business Interruption, COVID-19 Claims Under Pollution Policy Fails

    Economy in U.S. Picked Up on Consumer Spending, Construction

    Boston Team Obtains Complete Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in Professional Liability Matter

    Not All Design-Build Projects are Created Equal

    Thank You!

    MapLab: Why More Americans Are Moving Toward Wildfire

    Feds OK $9B Houston Highway Project After Two-Year Pause

    Without Reservations: Fourth Circuit Affirms That Vague Reservation of Rights Waived Insurers’ Coverage Arguments

    California Bid Protests: Responsiveness and Materiality

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    California Supreme Court Holds that Design Immunity Does Not Protect a Public Entity for Failure to Warn of Dangerous Conditions

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/26/25) – Uncertainty for Renters, a Record-High Hotel Project Pipeline and Hybrid Hopes for Office Leasing

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team for Prevailing on a Highly Contested Motion to Quash!

    Bats, Water, Soil, and Bridges- an Engineer’s dream

    Message from the Chair: Kelsey Funes (Volume I)

    American Roads Are Paved With Inefficiency

    New York Appellate Court Holds Insurer’s Failure to Defend Does Not Constitute a “Reasonable Excuse” Required to Overturn Judgment

    Prompt Payment More Likely on Residential Construction Jobs Than Commercial or Public Jobs

    Claims Made Insurance Policies

    The Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce Erosion

    Brazil Builder Bondholders Burned by Bribery Allegations

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water
    Corporate Profile

    WESTPHALIA INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction and design related expert designations, the Westphalia, Indiana Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Westphalia and the surrounding areas.

    Westphalia Indiana expert witness structural engineerWestphalia Indiana construction code expert witnessWestphalia Indiana multi family design expert witnessWestphalia Indiana consulting general contractorWestphalia Indiana OSHA expert witness constructionWestphalia Indiana engineering expert witnessWestphalia Indiana construction project management expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Westphalia, Indiana

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    July 13, 2026 —
    In this episode, I talk with Mark Sorsa-Leslie, founder and CEO of Auttaa AI, whose team just won first place in Luotea’s inaugural hackathon in Helsinki for turning property maintenance from reactive firefighting into proactive forecasting with AI. Mark is a chartered surveyor with 30 years of real estate data experience, previously the founder of the UK sensor company Beringar. We discuss why so much building data stays dark and siloed, from outdated networking technology to the shortage of people who understand both engineering and property. Mark explains how Auttaa bridges real-time building data with large language models, using what he calls an “influence graph” to surface correlations and causation across previously disconnected systems, such as linking occupancy patterns to CO2 readings to diagnose ventilation problems in minutes rather than days. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    March 03, 2026 —
    The court granted partial summary judgment on the duty to defend to two additional insureds who were named as defendants in the underlying personal injury suit. In re Third St. Equity, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234909 (E.D. N. Y. Dec. 2, 2025). Third Street Equity LLD hired Developing NY State, LLC as the contractor for a construction project. Developing NY entered a subcontract agreement with Capital Source Concrete NY LLC for concrete work as well as labor and services for a construction project. The subcontract required that Capital Concrete keep the construction site free of debris, waste material or rubbish. Further, Capital Concrete was responsible for compliance with OSHA safety regulations. It was also agreed that Capital Concrete would obtain liability and workers compensation insurance naming Third Street and Developing NY as additional insureds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...