BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Westpoint Indiana retail construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana housing expert witness Westpoint Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana institutional building expert witness Westpoint Indiana custom home expert witness Westpoint Indiana tract home expert witness Westpoint Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana parking structure expert witness Westpoint Indiana townhome construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana industrial building expert witness Westpoint Indiana low-income housing expert witness Westpoint Indiana hospital construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana casino resort expert witness Westpoint Indiana Medical building expert witness Westpoint Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Westpoint Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Westpoint Indiana condominium expert witness Westpoint Indiana office building expert witness Westpoint Indiana custom homes expert witness Westpoint Indiana multi family housing expert witness Westpoint Indiana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Westpoint, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Westpoint Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Greater Lafayette
    Local # 1548
    PO Box 5795
    Lafayette, IN 47903
    http://www.bagl.info

    East Central Indiana Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1556
    PO Box 1072
    Muncie, IN 47308


    Home Builders Association of Howard County Inc
    Local # 1532
    PO Box 1187
    Kokomo, IN 46903
    http://www.hbahowardco.com

    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362


    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375
    http://www.wcbaonline.com

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    http://www.buildindiana.org

    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244
    http://www.bagi.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Westpoint Indiana

    Preserving your Rights to Secure Payment on Construction Projects (with Examples)

    Construction Costs Absorb Two Big Hits This Quarter

    Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause

    Court Again Defines Extent of Contractor’s Insurance Coverage

    Alabama Supreme Court Reverses Determination of Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse

    Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle Obtains Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendant

    Eleven WSHB Attorneys Honored on List of 2016 Rising Stars

    Fla. Researchers Probe 'Mother of All Sinkholes'

    Second Month of US Construction Spending Down

    Sickened Employees at Kimley-Horn Lead to Multi-million-dollar Rent Dispute

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    Utility Contractor Held Responsible for Damaged Underground Electrical Line

    When Your “Private” Project Suddenly Turns into a “Public” Project. Hint: It Doesn’t Necessary Turn on Public Financing or Construction

    The American Rescue Plan Act: What Restaurants Need to Act on NOW

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    Allocating the Risk of Tariff Price Increases

    Class Actions Under California’s Right to Repair Act. Nope. Well . . . Nope.

    John Paulson’s $1 Billion Caribbean Empire Faces Betrayal

    Steel Component Plant Linked to West Virginia Governor Signs $1M Pollution Pact

    Fort Lauderdale Team Secures Appellate Win Affirming Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    Sales of U.S. Existing Homes Rise to One-Year High

    ASCE Statement on House Passage of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Congratulations to our 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Airbnb Declares End to Party!

    Traub Lieberman Partner Adam Joffe Named to 2022 Emerging Lawyers List

    New Home for the Aged Suffers Construction Defects

    Blackstone to Buy Apartments From Greystar in $2 Billion Deal

    GRSM New York Founding Partner Mercedes Colwin Honored with 2025 Excellence in Diversity Award by PLUS Foundation

    Connecticutt Class Action on Collapse Claims Faces Motion to Dismiss

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    “Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain!”

    Three lawyers from Haight were recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Edition

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    Multifamily Building Pushes New Jersey to Best Year since 2007

    Pennsylvania Sues Firms to Recoup Harrisburg Incinerator Losses

    Home Improvement in U.S. Slowing or Still Intact -- Which Is It?

    Wave Breaker: How a Living Shoreline Will Protect a Florida Highway and Oyster Bed

    Revisiting Statutory Offers to Compromise

    Sixth Circuit Lifts Stay on OSHA’s COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Standards. Supreme Court to Review

    ASCE Statement on Biden Administration Permitting Action Plan

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    UPDATED: Dominion Sues Feds Over Offshore Wind Project Halt, With Action Possible on Others Shut

    Litigation Roundup: “You Can’t Make Me Pay!”

    Developer Africa Israel Wins a Round in New York Condominium Battle

    Untangling Unique Legal Issues in Modern Modular Construction

    Illinois Court Assesses Factual Nature of Term “Reside” in Determining Duty to Defend

    And the Winner Is . . . The Right to Repair Act!

    Contractors Prepare for a Strong 2021 Despite Unpredictability

    The Greenest U.S. Cities & States
    Corporate Profile

    WESTPOINT INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Westpoint, Indiana Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Westpoint construction industry.

    Westpoint Indiana building code expert witnessWestpoint Indiana consulting engineersWestpoint Indiana roofing construction expertWestpoint Indiana roofing and waterproofing expert witnessWestpoint Indiana construction forensic expert witnessWestpoint Indiana construction cost estimating expert witnessWestpoint Indiana architectural engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Westpoint, Indiana

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    August 11, 2026 —
    In the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services. The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    Citadel’s Miami HQ Construction on Hold After Accident, Report Says

    October 12, 2026 —
    Construction work on Citadel’s new headquarters in Miami has been paused following an accident on the site last week, the Wall Street Journal reported. The collapse of a rig on Monday prompted county authorities to issue a stop-work order pending an investigation, according to the newspaper, which cited a local building official. It’s unclear how long the stoppage will last or what caused the accident, the WSJ wrote on Sunday, adding that such probes can take up to six months. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Giulia Morpurgo, Bloomberg

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    California Poised for the Most Significant Residential Construction Defect Reforms in Decades

    September 01, 2026 —
    The California Legislature is considering legislation that would dramatically alter the landscape of residential construction defect litigation. Assembly Bill 1903, currently pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee, proposes extensive amendments to California's Right to Repair Act (Civil Code sections 895-945.5) that would substantially strengthen procedural protections for builders while narrowing the scope of recoverable construction defect claims. If enacted, the legislation would affect virtually every stage of a construction defect dispute- from the initial notice of claim through litigation and settlement- and would introduce an entirely new certification process for newly constructed condominium projects. This article details some of the most significant proposed changes. Higher Burden for Construction Defect Plaintiffs Perhaps the most consequential change is the bill's modification of the proof required to establish liability. current law generally requires a claimant to demonstrate the residence fails to satisfy one of the statutory performance standards established under the Right to Repair Act. AB1903 would instead require claimants to establish three separate elements:
    • A violation of an applicable statutory performance standard;
    • The violation caused appreciable, present, non-speculative physical damage to another building component; and
    • The violation resulted from the original construction.
    Reprinted courtesy of Thomas D. Fama, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Andrew J. Mallon, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Fama may be contacted at tfama@wshblaw.com Mr. Mallon may be contacted at amallon@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    August 24, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is pleased to announce that 183 of its attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2027 Edition, six of whom received “Lawyer of the Year” recognitions. Additionally, 49 GRSM attorneys were recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2027. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on peer-review evaluations. For the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, results were determined using millions of confidential attorney evaluations. Ones to Watch adopts the same peer-review methodology. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...