Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027
August 03, 2026 —
Denis Serkin & Michael S. Zicherman - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.P&A partners
Denis Serkin and
Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide.
Reprinted courtesy of
Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com
Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law
June 29, 2026 —
Brenda Radmacher - The Construction SeytDaily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner
Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties.
The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLPMs. Radmacher may be contacted at
bradmacher@seyfarth.com
NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration
May 26, 2026 —
Levi W. Barrett & Aaron C. Schlesinger - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive.
The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs.
Reprinted courtesy of
Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com
Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List
June 22, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisCharlotte/North Charleston Partner Brandy G. Price and New York Partner Dean Pillarella have been selected to "The 2026 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation," which recognizes emerging leaders in law.
Lawdragon's annual Next Generation listing highlights up-and-coming attorneys with fewer than 15 years in practice. The legal media company selected these honorees through a combination of peer nominations, extensive journalistic research by Lawdragon editors, and independent vetting.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…
August 24, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesFlorida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy:
Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
GRSM Ranked Among Texas’ 50 Largest Law Firms by Texas Lawyer
August 03, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been recognized byTexas Lawyer in its 2026 Texas 100 ranking, earning the No. 49 spot among the state’s largest law firms by attorney headcount. The annual report spotlights the continued strength of Texas’ legal market, with firms across the state collectively increasing lawyer headcount by 2% in 2025.
“Texas continues to be one of the country’s most thriving legal and business markets, and we are proud to be recognized among the state’s largest law firms,” said Laura De Santos, Regional Oversight Partner for Texas. “Our continued growth shows the confidence our clients place in us, the exceptional talent of our attorneys, and our commitment to delivering seamless, high-quality legal services throughout Texas and across our 50-state platform.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
We Won’t Permit That Excuse!
June 23, 2026 —
Curt Martin & Richard Eiszner - ConsensusDocsA Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit?
But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation.
The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit.
Reprinted courtesy of
Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com
Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion
March 24, 2026 —
Kyle A. Rudolph & Anna M. Perry - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.In a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Navigators Insurance Company, the court addressed a theme that policyholders are often confronted with by insurers
[1] – insurers disputing additional insured coverage where the named insured is not named in the underlying action. The court aptly rejected this position since it was undisputed that the bodily injuries alleged in the underlying lawsuits were due to a gas explosion that was “caused, in whole or in part, by” the named insured’s acts or omissions.
I. Background
The additional insureds, Atlanta Gas Light Company and Southern Company Gas (collectively, “AGL”), retained the named insured, U
Endorsements Do Not Exclude Coverage for Wrongful Death ClaimDrafting the Bond Form, Particularly Performance Bond FormCity Potentially Liable for Cost Overrun on Not-to-Exceed Public Works ContractSeveral Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers!Wildfire Threats Make Utilities Uninsurable in US WestWhat ‘The Curse’ Gets
First Circuit Rejects Insurer’s “Insupportable” Duty-to-Cooperate Defense in Arson Coverage Suit
ADA Compliance Checklist For Your Business
Energy Efficiency Ratings Aren’t Actually Predicting Energy Efficiency
Ninth Circuit Court Weighs In On Insurance Coverage For COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses
Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Welcomes Quinlan Tom
Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara LLP Attorneys to Speak at the 2016 National Construction Claims Conference
How Will Today’s Pandemic Impact Tomorrow’s Construction Contracts?
Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court
Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/16/22) – Backlog Shifts, Green Battery Storage, and Russia-Ukraine Updates
Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality
Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress
Beware of Personal-Liability Clauses – Even When Signing in Your Representative Capacity
Surety's Settlement Without Principal's Consent Is Not Bad Faith
Fire Tests Inspire More Robust Timber Product Standard
Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause
Who Decides Who Can Arbitrate? The Court . . . Sometimes
South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs
Construction Litigation Group Listed in U.S. News Top Tier
Of Pavement and Pandemic: Liability and Regulatory Hurdles for Taking It Outside
COVID-19 Pandemic Preference Amendments to Bankruptcy Code Benefiting Vendors, Customers, Commercial Landlords and Tenants
Alaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured Party
Mitigate Construction Risk Through Use of Contingency
A Special CDJ Thanksgiving Edition
Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities
2025 Construction Outlook: Growth, But Uneven in Certain Areas
Administrative and Environmental Law Cases Decided During the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 Term
Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide
How Berger’s Peer Review Role Figures In Potential Bridge Collapse Settlement
What a Difference a Day Makes: Mississippi’s Discovery Rule
Chutes and Ladders...and Contracts.
Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea
Insurer Prevails on Summary Judgment for Bad Faith Claim
Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”
Contractor Allegedly Stole Construction Materials
Port Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal Replacement
There Is No Sympathy If You Fail to Read Closely the Final Negotiated Construction Contract
Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Irma
Supply Chain Delay Recommendations
Federal Judge Strikes Down CDC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium
Employer’s Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage
Colorado General Assembly Sets Forth Prerequisites for an Insurance Company to Use Failure to Cooperate as a Defense to a Claim for First Party Insurance Benefits
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/23/24) – Construction Backlog Rebounds, Real Estate Sustainability Grows, and Split Incentive Gap Remains Building Decarbonizing Barrier
New Jersey Appeals Court Ruled Suits Stand Despite HOA Bypassing Bylaw
The Moving Finish Line: Statutes of Limitation and Repose Are Not Always What They Seem
“Based On”… What Exactly? NJ Appellate Division Examines Phrase and Estops Insurer From Disclaiming Coverage for 20-Month Delay
BWB&O’s Los Angeles Office Obtains Major Victory in Arbitration!
Liquidating Agreements—Bridging the Privity Gap for Subcontractors
Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle
Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly
Ex-Pemex CEO Denies Allegations of Involvement in Brazil Scandal
