AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable
January 26, 2026 —
Lian Skaf - The Subrogation StrategistOn its face, the power of a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract is profound. It bars otherwise actionable – and sometimes egregious – losses resulting from contractor carelessness before they can ever get started. One question courts have long battled with is the limits to the lasting effects of such a waiver. Whether the waiver power can be transferred amongst parties, applied to third parties or used with policies taken out after construction completion are among the few grey areas that have kept subrogation practitioners and the courts busy. Recently, a federal court in Idaho clarified its position on the power to waive subrogation.
In Seneca Ins. Co. v. McAlvain Constr., Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00340-BLW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251777 (D. Idaho), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) addressed whether a subrogation waiver in an AIA construction contract, signed between an owner and the general contractor, applied to the subsequent owner of a building. In doing so, the court looked at the limiting language of the waiver as well as the contractual posture of the subsequent owner. Ultimately, the court found the waiver inapplicable, denying the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff McAlvain Construction, Inc. (McAlvain).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lian Skaf, White and WilliamsMr. Skaf may be contacted a
That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable
May 14, 2026 &md
A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]
February 23, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsWell, its that time of year again, the Virginia General Assembly is in session and looking to make changes to all kinds of things here in the Commonwealth. While most of those changes are well outside of the subject of Construction Law Musings, changes to the
mechanic’s lien statutes certainly are not. This year, the Virginia General Assembly is poised to make some big changes if certain legislation gets out of committee and passes the legislature, a description and some comments on these follow:
HB752 – Mechanics’ liens; liens attaching to property; memorandum of lien. [Original Description] Removes the exclusion of the attachment of a mechanic’s lien to property improved or repaired when the lien is based on a claim for repairs or existing structures. The bill further removes (i) the ability of a lien claimant to file any number of memoranda of lien including the details relating to the lien and (ii) the provisions of the Code specifying that no memorandum filed shall include sums due for (a) labor or materials furnished more than 150 days prior to the last day labor was performed or (b) material furnished to the job preceding the filing of such memorandum.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
2026 Construction Outlook: Dampening Outlook With Some Potential Bright Spots
February 17, 2026 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogAccording to Dodge Construction Network’s Outlook 2026 Ebook, “the construction industry came roaring into 2025” – with large government investments through the Infrastructure Bill and the CHIPS Act (promoting investment in the domestic semiconductor industry), as well as outsized spending on data centers to support cloud and AI technology – but “throttled back significantly” due to “rapid changes to economic and fiscal policies.”
These changes include short-term cost impacts due to tariffs and labor impacts due to the federal government’s immigration crackdown and long-term concerns following enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA) which is anticipated to add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit over ten years.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, NomosMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!
April 20, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPFor 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve.
What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results.
This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage
February 23, 2026 —
Elaine Silver - Engineering News-RecordJust 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Elaine Silver, Engineering News-RecordENR may be contacted at
enr@enr.com
HHMR: A Retrospective — Chapter One (2001–2025)
January 26, 2026 —
David McLain - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogThere comes a point in every career when you stop long enough to look back, not out of nostalgia, but out of clarity. You begin to see the arc, the accidents, the grace, and the moments when others carried more of the burden than you realized at the time. For me, that moment came recently, somewhere between the twenty-fifth year of practicing construction litigation and the rewriting of our firm’s operating agreement. I found myself asking a question I should have asked long ago: What are we building, and will it last?
The truth is that we at HHMR do not build anything. Our clients do. They are the ones building Colorado, from single-family homes and multifamily developments to commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects, navigating every constraint, hurdle, and barrier this state presents to them. They are the men and women in the arena, in Theodore Roosevelt’s sense. They pour foundations, frame walls, manage subs, balance supply chains, and take the risks inherent in the act of building anything of value. And for that work, they get sued. My job, and the job of this firm, is to defend them. We are their champions.
Understanding this truth is the starting point of HHMR 2.0. But to appreciate where we are going, you must first understand from where we came.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMr. McLain may be contacted at
mclain@hhmrlaw.com
Exclusion Bars Coverage For Cosmetic Hail Damage to Roof
January 13, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding there was no coverage for hail damage due to an exclusion for cosmetic hail damage. Cannon Falls Area Schools v Hanover Am. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206792 (D. Minn. Oct. 21, 2025).
On April 22, 2022, a hailstorm and high winds damaged the insured School’s buildings. The School’s buildings had metal roofs. The parties agreed that the hailstorm caused indentations to the roofs, but did not puncture the metal on the roofs. Since the storm, the roofs had not leaked.
The School submitted a claim for property damage to its insurer, Hanover. A portion of the claim for damage to the HVAC equipment was paid. The remainder of the claim was denied based on the policy’s Cosmetic Damage Exclusion which excluded coverage for cosmetic damage to roof surfacing caused by wind or hail.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy
March 24, 2026 —
Sydney Koby - ConsensusDocsIntroduction
On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications.
These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?Do Not File a Miller Act Payment Bond Lawsuit After the One-Year Statute of LimitationsCandis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2021 “Atlanta 500” ListUPDATE: Trade Secrets Pact Allows Resumed Work on $2.6B Ga. Battery PlantBattle Looms as Feds Order Washington State Coal Plant to Stay OpenA Lack of Sophistication With the Construction Contract Can Play Out In an Ugly DisputeEdison Has Miles of Idle Power Lines in High Fire Risk ZonesThe Miller Act: More Complex than You ThinkFinding of No Coverage Overturned Due to Lack of Actual PolicyLakewood Introduced City Ordinance to Battle Colorado’s CD LawIndustry Standard and Sole Negligence Defenses Can’t Fix a DefectReturn-to-Workplace Checklist: Considerations and Emerging Best Practices for EmployersMaui Wildfire Cleanup Could Cost $1B and Take One Year'Perfect Storm' Caused Fractures at San Francisco Transit HubIs the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative ActSunTrust Will Pay $968 Million to Resolve Mortgage ProbesMotion to Strike Insurer's Expert Opinion GrantedBertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy ContinuesAI-Powered Construction Optioneering TodayCDJ’s #9 Topic of the Year: Nevada Supreme Court Denies Class Action Status in Construction Defect CaseNot in My Kitchen – California Supreme Court Decertifies Golden State Boring CaseThe P
Denver Council Committee Approves Construction Defects Ordinance
Chinese Drywall Manufacturer Claims Product Was Not for American Market
A Year After Fatal Genoa Viaduct Collapse, Replacement Takes Shape
Determination That Title Insurer Did Not Act in Bad Faith Vacated and Remanded
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/29/25) – Office Market Bounces Back, Senate Passes ROAD to Housing Act, and CRE Embraces Blockchain
When is an Indemnification Provision Unenforceable?
First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years
Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Do Not Trigger Right to Independent Counsel
How Berger’s Peer Review Role Figures In Potential Bridge Collapse Settlement
Third Circuit Affirms Use of Eminent Domain by Natural Gas Pipeline
Damp Weather Not Good for Wood
“Over? Did you say ‘over’?”
Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology
LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine
Attorneys' Fees Awarded as Part of "Damages Because of Property Damage"
No Bad Faith In Filing Interpleader
Court Upholds Plan to Eliminate Vehicles from Balboa Park Complex
Not so Fast! How Does Revoking Acceleration of a Note Impact the Statute of Limitations?
2017 Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure
Ensuing Loss Provision Salvages Coverage for Water Damage Claim
Modernist Houses Galore! [visual candy for architects]
Why You Should Consider “In House Counsel”
Hotel Owner Makes Construction Defect Claim
Licensing Mistakes That Can Continue to Haunt You
It's a Wrap! Enforcing Online Agreements in Light of the CPRA
Look Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble Panels
Report to Congress Calls for Framework to Cut Post-Quake Recovery Time
Contractor Entitled to Defense Under Subcontractor’s Policy
Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration
What’s the Best Way to “Use” a Construction Attorney?
Court Adopts Magistrate's Recommendation to Deny Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion in Collapse Case
Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year’s Attempt at Reasonable Construction Defect Reform
California Court of Appeal Provides Clarity On What Triggers Supplemental Analysis Under California Environmental Quality Act
CDJ’s #10 Topic of the Year: Transport Insurance Company v. Superior Court (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 1216.
Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints
Court Upholds $68M Jury Award Over 2021 Fatal Fall in Philadelphia
Being deposed—not just for dictators! Depositions in the construction lawsuit (Law & Order: Hard Hat files Part 5)
A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib
Boyfriend Pleads Guilty in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Suicide
Coronavirus Is Starting to Slow the Solar Energy Revolution
New Opportunities for “Small” Construction Contractors as SBA Adjusts Its Size Standards Again Due to Unprecedented Inflation
Freight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge Fails
Road Project to Improve Access to Peru's Machu Picchu Site
Best Lawyers Recognizes Twenty White and Williams Lawyers
Torrey Pines Court Receives Funding for Renovation
California Court Affirms $1.8 Million Judgment Against HOA for Failing to Investigate and Remediate Water Intrusion
From Waste to Wealth: Texas Supreme Court Ruling in Cactus Water Defines Produced Water Ownership, Sets Stage for Clarity on Critical Mineral Markets in Texas
Construction Law Alert: Appellate Court Lets Broad General Release Stand in SB 800 Case
English v. RKK. . . The Rest of the Story
Charles Carter v. Pulte Home Corporation
