BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Andover Kansas office building expert witness Andover Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Andover Kansas low-income housing expert witness Andover Kansas tract home expert witness Andover Kansas hospital construction expert witness Andover Kansas condominiums expert witness Andover Kansas townhome construction expert witness Andover Kansas casino resort expert witness Andover Kansas parking structure expert witness Andover Kansas production housing expert witness Andover Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Andover Kansas housing expert witness Andover Kansas custom homes expert witness Andover Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Andover Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Andover Kansas multi family housing expert witness Andover Kansas custom home expert witness Andover Kansas industrial building expert witness Andover Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Andover Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Andover Kansas institutional building expert witness Andover Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Andover, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Andover Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wichita Area Builders Association
    Local # 1780
    730 N Main St
    Wichita, KS 67203
    http://www.wabahome.com

    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Andover Kansas

    Homebuilding Down in North Dakota

    North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies Breadth of Contractual Liability Coverage

    California Supreme Court Holds that Prevailing Wages are Not Required for Mobilization Work, for Now

    These Are the 13 Cities Where Millennials Can't Afford a Home

    The Overlooked Nevada Rule In an Arena Project Lawsuit

    Reasons to Be Skeptical About a Millennial Homebuying Boom in 2016

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    NYC Landlord Accused of Skirting Law With Rent-Free Months Offer

    Now Available: Seyfarth’s 50 State Lien Law Notice Requirements Guide (2023-2024 Edition)

    Surprising Dismissal of False Claims Act Case Based on Appointments Clause - What Does It Mean?

    Heathrow Tempts Runway Opponents With $1,200 Christmas Sweetener

    New Executive Order: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All

    A Deep Dive Into an Undervalued Urban Marvel

    Specific Performance: Equitable Remedy to Enforce Affirmative Obligation

    Historical Long-Tail Claims in California Subject to a Vertical Exhaustion Rule

    Will They Blow It Up?

    U.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days Inn

    Newmeyer Dillion Secures Victory For Crown Castle In Years-Long Litigation With City Council Of Piedmont Over Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Sites

    As Fracture Questions Remain, Team Raced to Save Mississippi River Bridge

    Fort Lauderdale Partner Secures Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    Are You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With Transparency

    Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause

    A Lesson from the Criminal Courtroom to Construction Contractors About Videos and Photos

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    Struggling Astaldi Announces Defaults on Florida Highway Contracts

    Designed to Expose: Beware Lender Certificates

    What Made the Savannah Harbor Upgrade So Complicated?

    Dear Engineer: Has your insurer issued a “Reservation of Rights” letter? (law note)

    Digital Twins for a Safer Built Environment

    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    Premises Liability: Everything You Need to Know

    Jury's Verdict for Loss Caused by Collapse Overturned

    OSHA COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing ETS Unveiled

    SB800 CONFIRMED AS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS

    Five New Laws to Know Before They Take Effect On Jan. 1, 2022

    EPA Will Soon Issue the Latest Revision to the Risk Management Program (RMP) Chemical Release Rules

    Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Of “Rare Earths” and Even Rarer Minerals

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Waiving Workers’ Compensation Immunity for Indemnity: Demystifying a Common and Scary-Looking Contract Term

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Tiny Houses Big With U.S. Owners Seeking Economic Freedom

    On Rehearing, Fifth Circuit Finds Contractual-Liability Exclusion Does Not Apply

    The General Assembly Seems Ready to Provide Some Consistency in Mechanic’s Lien Waiver

    Wearable Ways to Work in Extreme Heat

    Kahana Feld Secures Discontinuance with Prejudice in Fraudulent Case

    U.S. Housing Starts Top Forecast on Single-Family Homes

    Shutdowns? What A Covid-19-Safe Construction Site Looks Like

    Colorado Senate Bill 13-052: The “Transit-Oriented Development Claims Act of 2013.”

    Release Of “Unknown” Claim Does Not Bar Release Of “Unaccrued” Claim: Fair Or Unfair?

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .
    Corporate Profile

    ANDOVER KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Andover, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Andover region.

    Andover Kansas expert witnesses fenestrationAndover Kansas construction project management expert witnessesAndover Kansas structural engineering expert witnessesAndover Kansas construction project management expert witnessAndover Kansas construction claims expert witnessAndover Kansas fenestration expert witnessAndover Kansas engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Andover, Kansas

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation

    February 23, 2026 —
    The case of Moss & Associates, LLC v. Daystar Peterson and Brickell Heights East Condominium Association, Inc. represents a quiet but significant correction in Florida construction law litigation. The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of certiorari and quashed a trial court order that denied a contractor's motion to stay litigation under Chapter 558, Florida Statutes. Though procedurally narrow, the ruling reflects an increasingly assertive appellate stance. Chapter 558's pre-suit notice and right-to-repair process is mandatory, jurisdictional in effect, and not subject to dilution by trial-level discretion. At its core, the opinion reinforces a foundational principle. Florida intends for construction defect disputes to be managed, investigated, and often resolved before they reach a courtroom. The Third DCA's insistence on strict statutory compliance signals to trial courts, and to the plaintiffs' bar, that procedural shortcuts will not be tolerated. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan C. Brooks, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP and Keith G. Salhab, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Mr. Brooks may be contacted at rbrooks@wshblaw.com Mr. Salhab may be contacted at ksalhab@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    May 14, 2026 —
    On December 5, 2025, CMiC and Dodge released a survey asking over 6,000 companies across various sectors of the construction industry their stance on artificial intelligence—whether they use it or not; whether they like it or not; whether they have or are planning to implement it or not; and so on. Considering its reputation for skepticism and reluctance when it comes to adopting new forms of technology, the construction industry pleasantly surprised CMiC and Dodge with its answers to these questions, with 87% of contractors believing AI will have a meaningful impact on construction. “The research indicates the construction industry is nearing a tipping point for AI adoption,” says Steve Jones, senior director of industry insights at Dodge Construction Network, who sat down with Construction Executive to delve further into the survey questions and answers and what the industry’s current position on them means for AI’s future role in construction. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Texas Voids Out-of-State Forum and Choice of Law Clauses in Construction Contracts

    March 17, 2026 —
    The Texas Legislature amended statutes impacting construction contracts for projects located in Texas to declare any forum selection clause or choice of law provision “void as against public policy,” and mandate venue for any litigation or arbitration shall be in the Texas county in which the work is performed. The parties may stipulate to a different venue only after the dispute arises. Forum selection clauses and choice of law provisions are common in construction contracts. Frequently, general contractors based in other jurisdictions require subcontractors to sign contracts designating the contractor’s preferred venue for any dispute. These contracts may also select the law of another state to govern the contract. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    May 12, 2026 —
    Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations. After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com