BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Butler County Kansas institutional building expert witness Butler County Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Butler County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Butler County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Butler County Kansas retail construction expert witness Butler County Kansas industrial building expert witness Butler County Kansas condominiums expert witness Butler County Kansas production housing expert witness Butler County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Butler County Kansas custom homes expert witness Butler County Kansas office building expert witness Butler County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Butler County Kansas hospital construction expert witness Butler County Kansas condominium expert witness Butler County Kansas parking structure expert witness Butler County Kansas casino resort expert witness Butler County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Butler County Kansas custom home expert witness Butler County Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Butler County Kansas tract home expert witness Butler County Kansas multi family housing expert witness Butler County Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Butler County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Butler County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org

    Wichita Area Builders Association
    Local # 1780
    730 N Main St
    Wichita, KS 67203
    http://www.wabahome.com

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Butler County Kansas

    WARN Act Exceptions in Response to COVID-19

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers

    Gene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation Team

    Traub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Secure Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    Novation Agreements Under Federal Contracts

    Climate Change a Factor in 'Unprecedented' South Asia Floods

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Zillow Seen Dominating U.S. Home Searches with Trulia

    Free Texas MCLE Seminar at BHA Houston June 13th

    Suit Against Broker for Securing Inadequate Coverage Dismissed on Statute of Limitations Grounds

    “Families First Coronavirus Response Act”: Emergency Paid Leave for Construction Employers with Fewer Than 500 Employees

    Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform Bill

    Editorial: Qatar Is Champion of Safety Hypocrisy in Migrant Worker Deaths

    Meet D1's Neutrals Series: BILL FRANCZEK

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    Gatluak Ramdiet Named to The National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List

    West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar Returns to Anaheim May 15th & 16th

    Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform Bill

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Acceptable Worksite: New City of Seattle Specification Provisions Now In Effect

    Harmon Tower Case Settled Prior to Start of Trial

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Colorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” Standard

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Why Construction Law- An Update

    Scarce Cemetery Space Creates Prices to Die For: Cities

    Boston Team Secures Summary Judgment Dismissal on Client’s Behalf in Serious Personal Injury Case

    New Report: Civil Engineering Salaries and Job Satisfaction Are Strong and Climbing at a Faster Rate Than Past Reports

    Housing Starts in U.S. Beat 1 Million Pace for Second Month

    Federal Miller Act Payment Bond Claim: Who Gets Paid and Who Does Not? What Are the Deadlines?

    EPA Expands Energy Star, Adds Indoor airPLUS

    Do We Really Want Courts Deciding if Our Construction Contracts are Fair?

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Dispose of Hail Damage Claim Fails

    Connecticut Court Finds Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Enforceable

    The Drought Is Sinking California

    Wilke Fleury Secures Bid Protest Denial

    Construction and Contract Issues Blamed for Problems at Anchorage Port

    Construction Defect Settlement in Seattle

    Insurer’s “Failure to Cooperate” Defense

    Construction Law Advisory: Mechanical Contractor Scores Victory in Prevailing Wage Dispute

    No Interlocutory Appeals of "Garden-Variety" Contract Disputes

    San Diego Developer Strikes Out on “Disguised Taking” Claim

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reaffirms Validity of Statutory Employer Defense

    Congratulations to Haight’s 2021 Super Lawyers San Diego Rising Stars

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    Construction Worker Falls to His Death at Kyle Field

    Labor Intensive

    San Diego Appellate Team Prevails in Premises Liability Appeal

    BHA Sponsors the 9th Annual Construction Law Institute

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA
    Corporate Profile

    BUTLER COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Butler County, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Butler County and the surrounding areas.

    Butler County Kansas testifying construction expert witnessButler County Kansas building consultant expertButler County Kansas expert witness structural engineerButler County Kansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessButler County Kansas construction project management expert witnessButler County Kansas fenestration expert witnessButler County Kansas window expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Butler County, Kansas

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    January 26, 2026 —
    On its face, the power of a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract is profound. It bars otherwise actionable – and sometimes egregious – losses resulting from contractor carelessness before they can ever get started. One question courts have long battled with is the limits to the lasting effects of such a waiver. Whether the waiver power can be transferred amongst parties, applied to third parties or used with policies taken out after construction completion are among the few grey areas that have kept subrogation practitioners and the courts busy. Recently, a federal court in Idaho clarified its position on the power to waive subrogation. In Seneca Ins. Co. v. McAlvain Constr., Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00340-BLW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251777 (D. Idaho), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) addressed whether a subrogation waiver in an AIA construction contract, signed between an owner and the general contractor, applied to the subsequent owner of a building. In doing so, the court looked at the limiting language of the waiver as well as the contractual posture of the subsequent owner. Ultimately, the court found the waiver inapplicable, denying the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff McAlvain Construction, Inc. (McAlvain). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lian Skaf, White and Williams
    Mr. Skaf may be contacted at skafl@whiteandwilliams.com

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    January 26, 2026 —
    The insureds’ suit for coverage due to a collapse of their barn was dismissed while the bad faith against the insurer survived. Funaro v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227346 (W. D. Pa. Nov 19, 2025). The insureds’ barn was insured by State Farm. The insureds alleged that the barn roof collapsed from the weight of snow, causing damage to the structure of the barn itself and the contents of the barn (including a custom French stove that the insureds alleged was worth between $90,000 and $100,000). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    CA Civil Code § 8850: What Private Multi-state Owners and Developers Building in California in 2026 Need to Know

    January 26, 2026 —
    Owners and developers building in California must be aware of a new statute, CA Civil Code § 8850, which takes effect for contracts entered into, on, and after January 1, 2026. The statute will likely apply to most private construction projects; however, a carve-out exists for residential projects that are not mixed use and are four stories or less. When a contractor—or, with proper authorization, a subcontractor—submits a claim related to payment, time extensions, damages, or change orders (encompassing the majority of construction disputes), the owner must provide a written response within 30 days. This response must clearly state which portions of the claim are disputed and which are not. The owner has 60 days from the date of its response to issue payment for those undisputed amounts. Late payments will accrue interest at a rate of two percent per month. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...