BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas multi family housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom homes expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas retail construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas office building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas institutional building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas parking structure expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas casino resort expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas hospital construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Medical building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas production housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominiums expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas tract home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cheyenne County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flint Hills Area Builders Association
    Local # 1726
    2601 Anderson Ave Ste 207
    Manhattan, KS 66502
    http://www.flinthillsbuilders.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cheyenne County Kansas
    Corporate Profile

    CHEYENNE COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Cheyenne County, Kansas Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Cheyenne County and the surrounding areas.

    Cheyenne County Kansas construction project management expert witnessesCheyenne County Kansas expert witness commercial buildingsCheyenne County Kansas construction defect expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas construction code expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas structural engineering expert witnessesCheyenne County Kansas roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas architecture expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Circuit Court Supports Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protections in Connection with Internal Investigations

    November 21, 2025 —
    On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reaffirmed that the attorney-client privilege and work-product protections cover documents and communications concerning corporate internal investigations - even when companies later use those documents or related findings to make business decisions.1 In doing so, the court vacated a district court order that would have required FirstEnergy Corporation to produce, in civil litigation, privileged and work-product-protected documents related to two internal investigations. FirstEnergy, a public utility company headquartered in Ohio, became embroiled in a high-profile public-corruption scheme involving substantial alleged payments to state officials in exchange for favorable legislative efforts. In response, FirstEnergy and an independent committee of its board retained separate outside counsel to conduct internal investigations. FirstEnergy then faced civil litigation related to the same underlying facts. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Spitalnick, Snell & Wilmer, Taryn J. Gallup, Snell & Wilmer and Kourtney George, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Spitalnick may be contacted at jspitalnick@swlaw.com Ms. Gallup may be contacted at tgallup@swlaw.com Ms. George may be contacted at kegeorge@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Compass, Zillow Take Feud Over Home Listings Into NYC Court

    December 15, 2025 —
    Two heavyweights in the US residential real estate market, Compass Inc. and Zillow Inc., are facing off in a New York courtroom in a legal battle that could reshape the future of how homes are marketed and sold in the country. Compass, the largest residential brokerage, sued Zillow in June claiming the real estate site acts anticompetitively by banning listings that were publicly marketed elsewhere first. A four-day hearing began Tuesday before a federal judge who will decide whether to temporarily block Zillow’s policy while the lawsuit proceeds. The dispute is the latest in a long-running fight over who controls the most valuable asset in real estate: information. Compass has built a private listings network allowing sellers to quietly market homes with its own agents before posting on public multiple listing services (MLS). It argues the strategy lets sellers test demand and pricing without leaving a record on the MLS that could hurt future sales. Reprinted courtesy of Chris Dolmetsch, Bloomberg and Paulina Cachero, Bloomberg Read the full story...

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    Why the Total Recordable Incident Rate Doesn’t Tell the Whole Safety Story

    November 09, 2025 —
    TRIR - total recordable incident rate - has long served as the standard metric for tracking workplace injuries. However, events with the potential to result in a serious injury and fatality - or SIF-potential - demand more attention than standard metrics provide. While TRIR has long been used as a benchmark for safety performance, it doesn’t reflect the presence of high-risk exposures that could lead to life-altering or fatal outcomes. TRIR remains a key safety metric, but recognizing and responding to SIF-potential events is essential for organizations committed to true safety excellence. A Tale of Two Projects For example, look at how an overreliance on TRIR can impact two separate jobsites. Both projects have worked 150,000 hours with a significant amount of high-risk activities including site work, steel erection, precast concrete and curtain wall installation. Reprinted courtesy of David Tibbetts, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    If You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)

    January 21, 2026 —
    The NC Board of Architecture and the NC Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (as well as other Boards, including the NC Licensing Board for General Contractors) have grievance procedures in which anyone – client or not—can file a grievance against you. That’s the bad news. The good news is that the Boards have seen it all before, and if the grievance is someone unhappy about a bill, or using the process to harass you for unfounded reasons, they will recognize those complaints for what they are. HOWEVER, this does not mean that you should treat any grievance, no matter how unfounded, lightly. The first thing you need to do is contact your insurance broker/agent and report the matter. Often times, your insurance carrier will hire an attorney (someone like me) to defend you free of charge (at least up to a certain dollar amount). This is part of your insurance coverage, and you should take full advantage of it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Florida’s Proposed HB 255: A Quiet Shift That Could Reshape Condo Defect Liability

    January 21, 2026 —
    In Florida, developers and contractors work under strict clocks. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes, sets two firm deadlines for construction claims: a four-year statute of limitations and a seven-year statute of repose. Those timelines govern when an owner or condominium association may pursue claims for alleged defects. Once the repose period ends, the claim is barred regardless of when the problem surfaced. Condominium law complicates that scheme. Section 718.124 delays the start of the limitation and repose periods on association claims until control of the board shifts from the developer to the unit owners. The logic is simple: a developer-controlled board cannot be expected to sue the developer. The practical effect is more sweeping. If turnover occurs late in the life of a project, the repose period may remain tolled for years, extending exposure far beyond the seven years that apply everywhere else. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matt Maranges, Jones Walker
    Mr. Maranges may be contacted at mmaranges@joneswalker.com

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    January 26, 2026 —
    On its face, the power of a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract is profound. It bars otherwise actionable – and sometimes egregious – losses resulting from contractor carelessness before they can ever get started. One question courts have long battled with is the limits to the lasting effects of such a waiver. Whether the waiver power can be transferred amongst parties, applied to third parties or used with policies taken out after construction completion are among the few grey areas that have kept subrogation practitioners and the courts busy. Recently, a federal court in Idaho clarified its position on the power to waive subrogation. In Seneca Ins. Co. v. McAlvain Constr., Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00340-BLW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251777 (D. Idaho), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) addressed whether a subrogation waiver in an AIA construction contract, signed between an owner and the general contractor, applied to the subsequent owner of a building. In doing so, the court looked at the limiting language of the waiver as well as the contractual posture of the subsequent owner. Ultimately, the court found the waiver inapplicable, denying the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff McAlvain Construction, Inc. (McAlvain). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wyncrest Commons: Commonly Used Progress Payments in Construction Contracts Do Not Render Them Installment Contracts

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Duuers: Better Proposals with Less Work

    EEOC Suit Alleges Site Managers Bullied Black Workers on NY Project

    California Court of Appeal Finds Alleged Inadequate Defense by Insurer-Appointed Defense Counsel Does Not Trigger a Right to Independent Counsel

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    Suppliers Must Also Heed “Right to Repair” Claims

    AGC Seeks To Lead Industry in Push for Infrastructure Bill

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits

    In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer

    EPA Grants Arizona Lead Over Underground Injection Control Program

    Second Circuit Court Differentiates the Standard for Determining Evident Partiality for a Neutral Arbitrator and a Party-Appointed Arbitrator

    Cold Stress Safety and Protection

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Denial of Construction Defect Claim

    Congratulations to Arezoo Jamshidi & Michael Parme Selected to the 2022 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars List

    AFL-CIO Joins in $10 Billion Infrastructure Plan

    Three Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Benford’s Law: A Seldom Used Weapon in Forensic Accounting

    A Teaming Agreement is Still a Contract (or, Be Careful with Agreements to Agree)

    Proposed California Legislation Would Eliminate Certain Obstacles to Coverage for Covid-19 Business Income Losses

    The Double-Breasted Dilemma

    Nevada’s Changing Liability Insurance Landscape—State Insurance Regulator Issues Emergency Regulation and Guidance Addressing Controversial “Defense-Within-Limits” Legislation

    One Way Arbitration Provisions are Enforceable in Virginia

    Architect Norman Foster Tells COP26: Change 'Traditional' City Design to Combat Climate Change

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though

    Curtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique System

    No Duty to Defend Under Pollution Policy

    Staten Island Villa Was Home to Nabisco 'Nilla' Wafer Inventor

    Another Municipality Takes Action to Address the Lack of Condominiums Being Built in its Jurisdiction

    The Prompt Payment Rollercoaster

    There is No Presumptive Resumption!

    CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses

    Reminder: Know Your Contractor Licensing Rules

    California Mediation Confidentiality May Apply to Third Party “Participants” Retained to Provide Analysis

    Supply Chain Delay Recommendations

    Idaho Supreme Court Address Water Exclusion in Commercial Property Exclusion

    Hong Kong Popping Housing Bubbles London Can’t Handle

    Ninth Circuit Construes Known Loss Provision

    Motions to Dismiss, Limitations of Liability, and More

    California Court of Appeal Holds That the Right to Repair Act Prohibits Class Actions Against Manufacturers of Products Completely Manufactured Offsite

    Florida’s New Civil Remedies Act – Bulletpoints As to How It Impacts Construction

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to Best Lawyers in America© Orange County and as Attorneys of the Year 2018

    Determining Duty to Defend in Wisconsin Does Not Include Extrinsic Evidence

    Construction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year Ahead

    NYC Airports Get $500,000 Makeover Contest From Cuomo

    Cross-Motions for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings for COVID-19 Claim Denied

    Indemnitor Owes Indemnity Even Where Indemnitee is Actively Negligent, California Court Holds

    Court Finds That SIR Requirements are Not Incorporated into High Level Excess Policies and That Excess Insurers’ Payment of Defense Costs is Not Conditioned on Actual Liability

    Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2026

    Insurer's Denial of Coverage to Additional Insured Constitutes Bad Faith