BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas tract home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominiums expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas office building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Medical building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas production housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas parking structure expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas industrial building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas retail construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas casino resort expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas institutional building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominium expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cheyenne County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flint Hills Area Builders Association
    Local # 1726
    2601 Anderson Ave Ste 207
    Manhattan, KS 66502
    http://www.flinthillsbuilders.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cheyenne County Kansas

    Three Attorneys Named Among The Best Lawyers in America 2018

    New York Team’s Win Limits Scope of Property Owners’ Duties to Workers for Hazards Inherent in Their Work

    James R. Lynch Appointed to the Washington State Capital Project Review Committee

    Colorado General Assembly Sets Forth Prerequisites for an Insurance Company to Use Failure to Cooperate as a Defense to a Claim for First Party Insurance Benefits

    Is the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative Act

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    Insurance Client Alert: Denial of Summary Judgment Does Not Automatically Establish Duty to Defend

    Failing to Release A Mechanics Lien Can Destroy Your Construction Business

    April Rise in Construction Spending Not That Much

    Super Lawyers Selects Haight’s Melvin Marcia for Its 2023 Northern California Rising Stars List

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Subcontractor’s Claim against City Barred by City’s Compliance with Georgia Payment Bond Statute

    Massachusetts Federal Court Holds No Coverage for Mold and Water Damage Claim

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Automated Weather Insurance Could Offer Help in an Increasingly Hot World

    Bid Bonds: The First Preventative Measure for Your Project

    Hawaii Federal Court Grants Insured's Motion for Remand

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    Montana Federal Court Upholds Application of Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Legal Implications of 3D Printing in Construction Loom

    Developer Boymelgreen Forced to Hand Over Financial Records for 15 Broad Street

    Open & Known Hazards Under the Kinsman Exception to Privette

    Los Angeles Could Be Devastated by the Next Big Earthquake

    Edison Has Miles of Idle Power Lines in High Fire Risk Zones

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes

    Claim for Consequential Damages Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    When an Insurer Proceeds as Subrogee, Defendants Should Not Assert Counterclaims Against the Insured/Subrogor

    Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

    Zetlin & De Chiara Ranked in the Top Tier for Construction Law by Legal 500 USA

    Serving the 558 Notice of Construction Defect Letter in Light of the Statute of Repose

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2020 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Appellate Team Secures Victory in North Carolina Governmental Immunity Personal Injury Matter

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

    Luxury Home Sales are on the Rise

    Doctrine of Merger Not a Good Blend for Seller of Sonoma Winery Property

    Top Developments: 2025 - Issue 2

    John O’Meara is Selected as America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators

    Another (Insurer) Bites The Dust: Virginia District Court Rejects Narrow Reading of Pollution Exclusion

    Skanska Found Negligent for Damages From Breakaway Barges

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Is the Sky Actually Falling (on Green Building)?

    Why Construction Law- An Update

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions

    Texas Supreme Court Rules for Road Contractors in Critical Legal Immunity Test

    With Trump's Tariff Talk, Time to Negotiate for Escalation Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Fifth Circuit Certifies Questions to Texas Supreme Court on Concurrent Causation Doctrine

    GRSM Multi-Office Team Secures Dismissal of Claims for Global Paint and Coatings Manufacturer Under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act

    Options When there is a Construction Lien on Your Property
    Corporate Profile

    CHEYENNE COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Cheyenne County, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Employing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Cheyenne County construction industry.

    Cheyenne County Kansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas multi family design expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas consulting architect expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas consulting general contractorCheyenne County Kansas consulting engineersCheyenne County Kansas construction claims expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    April 14, 2026 —
    During my involvement in designing mobile phone production facilities, the speed of design and construction was critical. Any delay could directly translate into lost revenue. That same logic now applies to data centers, though the stakes are much higher. Instead of optimizing physical production lines, we are constructing infrastructure for digital production. The global data center capacity is expected to nearly double by 2030, and with this level of demand, the traditional project-by-project delivery model begins to show its limitations. Data centers are no longer isolated projects in the traditional sense. They are evolving into repeatable, scalable production systems, making them ideal environments for AEC process and business model innovation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Virginia Multi-Employer Site Safety Issues–and How to Deal with Them

    February 02, 2026 —
    The world of the Owner, Contractor, Subcontractor “straight line” project model is long gone. Increasingly complex construction needs for commercial owners require the services of numerous trades, and even multiple “prime” contractors at times, to perform the various stages of construction. Because of the complex and multi-employer nature of the modern commercial worksite, as a contractor, you may no longer be responsible only for the safety of your own employees. Depending on the state in which your project is being built, you, as a general contractor, may be responsible for hazards at your worksite that you did not create. On federal job sites (or in states that have merely adopted the federal OSHA standard), one rule applies. In some states that have their own safety regulations, another rule applies. Under the Federal OSHA guidelines, the state regulations must be at least as stringent as those of the Federal safety regulations. This flexibility allows states to impose stricter (though not more lenient) rules upon construction site contractors. While this flexibility allows state safety officials to better tailor their policies, it has caused confusion in the multi-employer realm. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Texas Court Revives Construction Defect Claims: Key Lessons for Managing Latent Defect Risk

    January 21, 2026 —
    Construction projects often involve intricate designs, multiple stakeholders, and complex performance obligations. When problems surface years after completion, parties must navigate a difficult landscape that blends contract law, tort doctrines, and statutory deadlines. A recent decision from the Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas provides meaningful guidance on how courts will evaluate latent construction defect claims, the applicability of the discovery rule, and the limits of the economic loss doctrine. In Morningside Ministries v. Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd., the court reversed summary judgment entered in favor of the general contractor and project manager, reviving the owner's claims and offering important lessons for owners, contractors, and insurers facing construction defect disputes. Background of the Dispute Morningside Ministries operates senior living communities across Texas. In 2012, It contracted with Koontz McCombs Construction, Ltd. (Koontz) to construct The Overlook, a significant expansion of Morningside's Menger Springs campus in Boerne. The contract required Koontz to build 100 new senior living units along with common areas and site improvements, and placed responsibility for construction quality, including the work of subcontractors, on Koontz. Reprinted courtesy of Spencer E. Dunn, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Melissa Osio Martinez, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Dunn may be contacted at sdunn@wshblaw.com Ms. Martinez may be contacted at mosiomartinez@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    March 17, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter’s client owned a condo, which he rented out. The tenant allegedly assaulted Plaintiff across the street from the condo, resulting in personal injury, including nerve damage. Shanna did the research and writing, and Jeff argued the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court ruled, in pertinent part, that the subject assault off property was not foreseeable, resulting in a complete dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Groundbreaking New York Law Regulates Third-Party Litigation Funding for the First Time

    February 02, 2026 —
    On December 19, 2025, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Consumer Litigation Funding Act (A804-C/S1104A) into law. The new statute takes aim at abusive third-party litigation funding practices statewide. For years, the unregulated "lawsuit loan" industry has acted as a silent inflator of claim values, forcing plaintiffs to reject reasonable settlement offers in order to pay back exorbitant interest. The new regulatory framework, effective June 17, 2026, introduces caps and transparency measures that may help stabilize settlement negotiations and curb artificially inflated demands. The law does not apply to contracts made before its effective date. Below are some of its most important provisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas P. Hurzeler, Lewis Brisbois
    Mr. Hurzeler may be contacted at Nicholas.Hurzeler@lewisbrisbois.com

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com