BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas multi family housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominiums expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Medical building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom homes expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas casino resort expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas hospital construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas industrial building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas institutional building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominium expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas parking structure expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas production housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas retail construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cheyenne County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flint Hills Area Builders Association
    Local # 1726
    2601 Anderson Ave Ste 207
    Manhattan, KS 66502
    http://www.flinthillsbuilders.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cheyenne County Kansas

    SDV Earns Top Honors from Chambers and Partners USA 2025 Award

    Corrective Action Protest Grounds for GSA Schedule Federal Construction Contractors

    AGC’s 2024 Construction Outlook. Infrastructure is Bright but Office-Geddon is Not

    Patriarch Partners Decision Confirms Government Subpoenas May Constitute a “Claim” Under D&O Policy; Warns Policyholders to Think Broadly When Representing Facts and Circumstances to Insurers

    How to Challenge a Project Labor Agreement

    Did You Get a Notice of Mechanic’s Lien after Project Completion? Don’t Panic!

    Safety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest Danger

    Second Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of NY’s Zero Emissions Credit Program

    Dallas Home Being Built of Shipping Containers

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    Contractors Set to Implement Air Quality Upgrades for Healthier Buildings

    Assignment of Insured's Policy Ineffective

    Shiloh and Vallejo: The DOI Tale of Two Properties

    Insured's Commercial Property Policy Deemed Excess Over Unobtained Flood Policy

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    Occurrence Definition Trends Analyzed

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract is Only as Good as Those Signing It

    17 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Ranked In The 2019 Legal Elite Edition Of Nevada Business Magazine

    Appellate Court of Maryland Construes Notice Conditions of A312 Performance Bond in Favor of Surety

    Electronic Signatures On Contracts: Are They Truly Compliant?

    "Abrupt Falling Down of Building or Part of Building" as Definition of Collapse Found Ambiguous

    Not in My Kitchen – California Supreme Court Decertifies Golden State Boring Case

    Napa Quake Seen Costing Up to $4 Billion as Wineries Shut

    Tennessee Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    2020s Most Read Construction Law Articles

    Daiwa House to Invest 150 Billion Yen in U.S. Rental Housing

    Where Mechanic’s Liens and Contracts Collide

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Associate Cary D. Steklof Selected to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite Up & Comers List for 2019

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    Providing Your Insurer Prompt Notice

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Timber Prices Likely to Keep Rising

    The Construction Industry Lost Jobs (No Surprise) but it Gained Some Too (Surprise)

    What Makes a Great Lawyer?

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Los Angeles Office on Another Successful MSJ!

    OSHA Updates: You May Be Affected

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Common Law Indemnity Claim Affirmed on Justifiable Beliefs

    3D Printing: A New Era in Concrete Construction

    Viewpoint: Firms Should Begin to Analyze Lessons Learned in 2020

    Prompt Payment More Likely on Residential Construction Jobs Than Commercial or Public Jobs

    Enforcement Of Contractual Terms (E.G., Flow-Down, Field Verification, Shop Drawing Approval, And No-Damage-For-Delay Provisions)

    Homeowners Sued for Failing to Disclose Defects

    Coverage Article - To Settle or Not To Settle?

    Housing in U.S. Cools as Rate Rise Hits Sales: Mortgages

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    Lenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered Conditions

    Keeping Detailed Records: The Best Defense to Constructive Eviction
    Corporate Profile

    CHEYENNE COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Cheyenne County, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Cheyenne County and the surrounding areas.

    Cheyenne County Kansas testifying construction expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas construction project management expert witnessesCheyenne County Kansas hospital construction expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas consulting general contractorCheyenne County Kansas architect expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    January 21, 2026 —
    The court determined that the subcontractor’s insurer owed a defense to the additional insured general contractor in a bodily injury suit. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227712 (S.D. W. V. Nov. 19, 2025). A.L.L. Construction, Inc. was the general contractor for a construction project. West Virginia Paving, Inc. was the subcontractor for paving work. After construction began, Charlottee Smith allegedly fell and was injured due to A.L.L. and West Virginia Paving’s negligent work. She sued both A.L.L. and West Virgina Paving. Smith and West Virginia Paving settled. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment Form Used in California Construction

    December 22, 2025 —
    This is the Second article in a series of four articles discussing how to properly fill out the four California construction releases described in California Civil Code 8132 – 8138. Let me start by noting that in addition to practicing construction law for more than 35 years, I chaired the committee of California construction attorneys who revised those sections of the California Civil Code dealing with this release form and many other construction forms as part of Senate Bill 189 in 2010. I also wrote the first version of this release form and made it free to the public well before the new law took effect in 2012. With this background, let me note a few things about the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment form to help you avoid mistakes that might prevent you from achieving the intended effect of the form or releasing claim rights to a greater extent than you intend. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations

    January 13, 2026 —
    On December 9, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) issued proposed regulations and a staff report for California’s comprehensive climate disclosure laws, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261). These proposed regulations come less than a month after the Ninth Circuit issued an injunction temporarily halting enforcement of SB 261, at least until a January 9, 2026, hearing on the plaintiffs’ requested longer-term injunction through the remainder of the First Amendment challenge to the laws. The draft regulations would adopt some, but not all, of the provisions proposed by CARB in its public workshops on the laws to date, and notably would scale back applicability to those companies above a threshold level of sales in the state. The proposed regulations also define key terms, establish the program fee structures, explain fee enforcement and set initial reporting timelines. The written comment period begins on December 26, 2025, and ends on February 9, 2026. CARB will hold a public hearing on the proposed regulations on February 26, 2026 at 9 a.m. PST. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury and Karen Eskander, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Eskander may be contacted at karen.eskander@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Five Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers

    March 10, 2026 —
    Five Payne & Fears attorneys have been named to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list in recognition of their work across a range of practice areas. This honor reflects their dedication to their clients, depth of experience, and the high standard of service they bring to every matter. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    April 14, 2026 —
    Every time an employee pastes proprietary source code, a customer list, or a confidential business strategy into ChatGPT, Claude, or Google Gemini, they may be quietly dismantling the legal protections that make those secrets worth protecting. Courts and regulators are only beginning to grapple with this problem, and right now, the burden of preventing it falls squarely on employers. The Legal Stakes Under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) as adopted across most states, a trade secret plaintiff must show that the information at issue was subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. Courts have historically credited measures like confidentiality agreements, physical access controls, and employee training—but those safeguards were designed for a world of thumb drives and disgruntled employees. They were not built for a world where a well-meaning engineer can, in seconds, transmit an entire corpus of proprietary data to a third-party AI platform operating under terms of service that may permit the provider to use inputs for model training. Reprinted courtesy of Kazim A. Naqvi, Sheppard and John V. Mysliwiec, Sheppard Mr. Naqvi may be contacted at knaqvi@sheppard.com Mr. Mysliwiec may be contacted at jmysliwiec@sheppard.com Read the full story...