BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas townhome construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas low-income housing expert witness Nekoma Kansas industrial building expert witness Nekoma Kansas multi family housing expert witness Nekoma Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas casino resort expert witness Nekoma Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Nekoma Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Nekoma Kansas parking structure expert witness Nekoma Kansas production housing expert witness Nekoma Kansas retail construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas office building expert witness Nekoma Kansas custom homes expert witness Nekoma Kansas housing expert witness Nekoma Kansas tract home expert witness Nekoma Kansas hospital construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas condominium expert witness Nekoma Kansas institutional building expert witness Nekoma Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Nekoma Kansas custom home expert witness Nekoma Kansas
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Nekoma, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Nekoma Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460


    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504
    http://www.hutchbuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401
    http://www.salinahba.com

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046
    http://www.lhba.net

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604
    http://www.thba.com

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603
    http://www.kansasbuilders.org

    Wichita Area Builders Association
    Local # 1780
    730 N Main St
    Wichita, KS 67203
    http://www.wabahome.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Nekoma Kansas

    Judge Nixes SC's $100M Claim Over MOX Construction Delays

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    Negligent Inspection Claim Against Supervising Design Professional / Consultant

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 2 – Procedural Due Process

    Canada’s Largest Homebuilder Sets U.S. Growth Plan

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    Rancosky Adopts Terletsky: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets Standard for Statutory Bad Faith Claims

    Insurers Dispute Sharing of Defense in Construction Defect Case

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Sub-Contractor

    Los Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly Wildfire

    Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls

    General Contractor’s Ability to Supplement Subcontractor Per Subcontract

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    A Construction Stitch in Time

    Fatal Boston Garage Demolition Leaves Long Road to Recovery

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    After Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse, Fast-Rising Replacement Emerges

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    New York Court of Appeals Takes Narrow View of Labor Law Provisions in Recent Cases

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams Lawyers

    Clean Energy and Conservation Collide in California Coastal Waters

    The Miller Act Explained

    Economic Damages and the Right to Repair Act: You Can’t Have it Both Ways

    Civil Engineers: Montana's Infrastructure Grade Declines to a 'C-'

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    Thanks to All for My 9th Straight Super Lawyers Election

    Settlement Agreement? It Ain’t Over ‘Til it’s . . . Final, in Writing, Fully Executed, and Admissible

    Circumstances In Which Design Professional Has Construction Lien Rights

    Montreal Bridge Builders Sue Canada Over New Restrictions

    Value In Being Deemed “Statutory Employer” Under Workers Compensation Law

    Miorelli Doctrine’s Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts — Not the Be-All and End-All

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    The Registered Agent Advantage

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    The Moment of Truth

    Insurer Has No Obligation to Cover Arbitration Award in Construction Defect Case

    Norfolk Southern Accused of Trying to Destroy Evidence of Ohio Wreck

    California Commission Recommends Switching To Fault-Based Wildfire Liability Standard for Public Utilities

    Smart Home Products go Mainstream as Consumer Demand Increases

    Federal Shutdown Idles Most OSHA Activity, Raising Safety and Compliance Concerns

    Transplants Send Nashville Home Market Upwards

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    Ninth Circuit Finds Policy’s Definition of “Policy Period” Fatal to Insurer’s “Related Claims” Argument

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    Damages or Injury “Likely to Occur” or “Imminent” May No Longer Trigger Insurance Coverage

    Massive Redesign Turns Newark Airport Terminal Into a Foodie Theme Park

    Time Is Money on Construction Projects and Categories of Delay

    Insurance Tips for Contractors
    Corporate Profile

    NEKOMA KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Nekoma, Kansas Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Nekoma region.

    Nekoma Kansas construction safety expertNekoma Kansas expert witness structural engineerNekoma Kansas construction project management expert witnessesNekoma Kansas consulting engineersNekoma Kansas architectural engineering expert witnessNekoma Kansas eifs expert witnessNekoma Kansas construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Nekoma, Kansas

    New Florida Law Adds Licensing Risk to Contractor/Subcontractor Payment Disputes

    September 29, 2026 —
    Effective July 1, 2026, Florida’s newly enacted Section 489.1295 of the Florida Statutes, titled “Prohibition Against Nonpayment,” requires licensed contractors to timely compensate subcontractors and suppliers for labor, services, or materials. Enacted as part of Senate Bill 290 (Ch. 2026-3, Laws of Fla.), the statute adds a new basis for instituting disciplinary proceedings against a contractor’s license if a payment is knowingly or willfully withheld. While this is not a sweeping overhaul of Florida construction payment laws by any means, contractors should be aware that nonpayment disputes with subcontractors and suppliers may carry potential licensing consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Brett J. Moritz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Ali Heyat, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Moritz may be contacted at bmoritz@pecklaw.com Mr. Heyat may be contacted at aheyat@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    May 12, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel Ayushi Neogi has authored an article in the Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada’s Defense Comment magazine examining the shifting landscape of arbitration following the Ending Forced Arbitration Act. Titled “Compelling Arbitration in a Post-Ending Forced Arbitration Act, Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape,” the article analyzes how recent legislative changes are reshaping arbitration strategy, particularly as employees gain greater ability to bypass arbitration in certain claims. Neogi provides practical insight into how courts are responding and what this means for defense counsel navigating increasingly complex and plaintiff-friendly environments. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Snell & Wilmer’s Los Angeles Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Los Angeles Business Journal

    September 15, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has been named one of the 2026 Best Places to Work by the Los Angeles Business Journal as part of its annual Best Places to Work awards. The recognition honors outstanding employers across the Los Angeles region that are fostering strong workplace cultures and creating positive employee experiences. Selections are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors. “We are honored to be recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Los Angeles,” said Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “This recognition reflects the collaborative culture we have built and the dedication of our attorneys and professional staff who contribute to making our office a great place to work. We remain committed to providing opportunities for growth, fostering meaningful connections, and supporting our team members’ continued success.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com