Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework
June 02, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWorkers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “
statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance.
With workers compensation comes
workers compensation immunity.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England
April 14, 2026 —
Stephen J. Humes - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogOn March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Stephen J. Humes, PillsburyMr. Humes may be contacted at
stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com
Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements
April 08, 2026 —
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Mehul N. Madia & Maxwell Earp-Thomas - SheppardOn March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed “Homeowner Benefit Agreements” to financially struggling homeowners.
According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction.
Reprinted courtesy of
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Sheppard,
Mehul N. Madia, Sheppard and
Maxwell Earp-Thomas, Sheppard
Mr. Dhaliwal may be contacted at adhaliwal@sheppard.com
Mr. Madia may be contacted at mmadia@sheppard.com
Mr. Earp-Thomas may be contacted at mearp-thomas@sheppard.com
Read the full story...
Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List
June 02, 2026 —
Lewis BrisboisOrange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California.
In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve."
"Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it."
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes
May 14, 2026 —
Brandon Wright & Manuel Gurule - Lewis BrisboisNevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000.
By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3].
Reprinted courtesy of
Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and
Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois
Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com
Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com
Read the full story...
The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison
June 02, 2026 —
Eric M. Clarkson - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.1. Introduction
As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years.
The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at
EClarkson@sdvlaw.com
White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins
May 12, 2026 —
Gabriel Darwick & Sean Elman - White and Williams LLPThree weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins.
White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit.
Reprinted courtesy of
Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and
Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP
Mr. Darwick
Top Developments: 2025 - Issue 2Build, Baby, Build. But Not Like This, Britain.STV and Tutor Perini/Parsons Arbitrate Unusual Dispute Over Seven $1M DeductiblesPaycheck Protection Flexibility Act Of 2020: What You Need to KnowUnderstanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper SupportYou Can Now Build a Multi-Million Dollar Home via Your iPadRenovation Contractors: Be Careful How You Disclose Your ProjectsNew Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction IndustryCourt of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable SubrogationFederal Regulatory Recap: A Summary of Recent Rulemaking Actions Taken or Proposed Affecting the Energy IndustryAdditional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury SuitRoad Project to Improve Access to Peru's Machu Picchu SiteCongratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars ListsThe Final Nail: Ongoing Repairs Do Not Toll the Statute of ReposeCOVID-19 Win for Policyholders! Court Approves "Direct Physical Loss" ArgumentWho, Me?Partner Lisa M. Rolle and Associate Vito John Marzano Obtain Dismissal of Third-Party Indemnification ClaimsHow the Jury Divided $112M in Seattle Crane Collapse DamagesCaterpillar Forecast Tops Estimates as Construction RecoversNo Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese DrywallDocumenting Contract Changes in ConstructionConstruction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Inverse Condemnation ActionDeveloper Pre-Conditions in CC&Rs Limiting Ability of HOA to Make Construction Defect Claims, Found UnenforceableIf I Released My California Mechanics Lien, Can I File a New Mechanics Lien on the Same Project? Will the New Mechanics Lien be Enforceable?Washington Court Denies Subcontractor’s Claim Based on Contractual Change and Notice ProvisionsAll Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains DamageCommencing of the Statute of Repose for Construction DefectsThe “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect ReformsResulting Loss From Faulty Workmanship CoveredContractor Sued for Contract Fraud by GovernmentNew Utah & Colorado Homebuilder Announced: Jack Fisher HomesCoverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property ExclusionsEmployees in Construction Industry Entitled to Compensation for Time Spent Complying with Employer-Mandated Security ProtocolsSeveral Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers!Pennsylvania Court Finds that Two Possible Causes Can Prove a Product Malfunction Theory of LiabilityFlorida “Property Damage” caused by an “Occurrence” and “Your Work” ExclusionContract’s Definition of “Substantial Completion” Does Not Apply to Third Party for Purposes of SOL, Holds Court of AppealContractors Admit Involvement in KickbacksHunton Andrews Kurth’s Insurance Recovery Practice, Andrea DeField and Cary D. Steklof, Recognized as Legal EliteConstruction Laborers Sue Contractors Over Wage TheftCourt of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable SubrogationNewmeyer Dillion Partner Louis "Dutch" Schotemeyer Named One of Orange County's 500 Most Influential by Orange County Business JournalUnpaid Hurricane Maria Insurance Claims, New Laws in Puerto Rico, and the Lesson for all PolicyholdersSoldiers Turn Brickies as U.K. Homebuilders Seek WorkersOne to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional DutiesFederal Court Predicts Coverage In Utah for Damage Caused By Faulty WorkmanshipAmazon Can be Held Strictly Liable as a Product Seller in New JerseyMajor Change to Residential Landlord Tenant LawCourt Confirms No Duty to Reimburse for Prophylactic Repairs Prior to Actual CollapseNYC’s Next Hot Neighborhoods Targeted With Property FundsWill the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?Efficient Proximate Cause Applies to Policy's Collapse ProvisionsWhen a Request for Equitable Adjustment Should Be Treated as a Claim Under the Contract Disputes ActMaryland Finally set to Diagnose an Allocation Method for Progressive InjuriesUPDATE: ACS Obtains Additional $13.6 Million for General Contractor Client After $19.2 Million Jury Trial VictoryProtecting Expert Opinions: Lessons Regarding Attorney-Client Privilege and Expert Retention in Construction LitigationHere's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your HomeIllinois Town’s Bond Sale Halted Over Fraudulent Hotel DealsDesign Professional Liens: A BlueprintIndirect Benefit Does Not Support Unjust Enrichment Claim Against Prime ContractorStuck in Seattle: The Aggravating Adventures of a Gigantic Tunnel DrillThe Fourth Circuit Applies a Consequential Damages Exclusionary Clause and the Economic Loss Doctrine to Bar Claims by a Subrogating Insurer Seeking to Recover Over $19 Million in DamagesConstruction Defect Journal Seeks Article Submissions Regarding SB800 and Other Builders Right to Repair LawsPennsylvania: When Should Pennsylvania’s New Strict Products Liability Law Apply?Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent DefectsThree Attorneys Named Among The Best Lawyers in America 2018Expired Contract Not Revived Due to Sovereign Immunity and the Ex Contractu Clause
