GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times
June 02, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly congratulates Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen on being named a 2026 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times Studios 2026 Legal Visionaries List recognizes lawyers in Southern California who “exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it.” Meppen is recognized for helping shape the future of the legal profession through her leadership, professionalism, and integrity.
Published as part of the May 2026 issue highlighting Southern California’s leading law firms and attorneys, the Legal Visionaries section honors attorneys making a significant impact on the legal industry and the broader business community.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
Safeguarding Your Privileged Construction Information With a Clawback Agreement
June 08, 2026 —
Laura Fraher - Construction ExecutiveFor contractors and construction executives, a
dispute that escalates to litigation brings risks that go well beyond the jobsite. When a dispute escalates to litigation, the attorney-client privilege is a critical protection to safeguard your interests. Disclosing privileged material can undermine your litigation position and, in some cases, negatively impact your business. In the construction context, this often includes sensitive communications about project delays, defect investigations, safety incidents or payment disputes—materials that can significantly impact both liability and reputation.
During litigation, the discovery process requires the exchange of documents and data with your adversary. If privileged materials are disclosed to your adversary during discovery you risk the waiver of your privilege, which in plain terms means you lose the protection of the privilege and make the privileged information, and in some cases all other information related to the same subject matter, available to your adversary. It is critical that your attorney take steps to protect against the unintentional disclosure of privileged materials during discovery to avoid a waiver.
Reprinted courtesy of
EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360June 08, 2026 — Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligatEngineering Seals Versus Contracts ‘Under Seal’ (Two Very Different Things)
May 05, 2026 — Melissa Dewey Brumback - Construction Law in North Carolina
Recently, I was asked by a reader to explain the difference between a document that is ‘sealed’ by an engineer (or architect) and one that is
signed ‘under seal’. This question prompted this post, as others may also be wondering about the distinction. [Hi Ed! Thanks for your question]
Professionals have ‘seals’ that show that they are registered (Engineers) or licensed (Architects). As most of you likely know, your professional seal is something that is hard won and which is used when—and only when—your plans were made by you or someone under your direct supervisory control. Your signature represents that you were in
responsible control over the documents, and that they have met the required professional standard of care. (21 NC Admin Code 2-0206 (a)(11)).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLCMs. Brumback may be contacted at
mbrumback@rl-law.com
Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes
May 14, 2026 —
Brandon Wright & Manuel Gurule - Lewis BrisboisNevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000.
By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3].
Reprinted courtesy of
Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and
Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois
Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com
Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com
Read the full story...
A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction
June 29, 2026 —
James P. Bobotek, Arielle L. Murphy & Robert A. James - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogData center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions.
Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements.
Reprinted courtesy of
James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury,
Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and
Robert A. James, Pillsbury
Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com
Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays
August 03, 2026 —
James Leggate - Engineering News-RecordWork on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s
Turnover Traps for Community Associations: Investigate First, Release Claims Later
April 14, 2026 —
Nicholas B. Vargo - Ball Janik LLPTurnover of a community association from developer control to owner control is a uniquely vulnerable moment. Developers are increasingly presenting Florida condominium and homeowners’ associations with “standard” settlement or release agreements at turnover, often being framed as routine steps to finalize the transition of control. In reality, these agreements can have sweeping consequences, including the release of construction-defect claims before the association has conducted any meaningful independent evaluation.
The developer has years of project knowledge and acc
Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense
May 14, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026).
Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional
April 27, 2026 —
Christopher Olsen & Phillip Boldt - ConsensusDocsTo deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate.
The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy)
In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com
Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com
Read the full
Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhoo
Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win
Diggerland, UK’s Construction Equipment Theme Park, is coming to the U.S.
Colorado Passes Compromise Bill on Construction Defects
California Home Sellers Have Duty to Disclose Construction Defect Lawsuits
Finding Highway Compromise ‘Tough,’ DOT Secretary Says
“You’re Out of Here!” -- CERCLA (Superfund) Federal Preemption of State Environmental Claims in State Courts
Insurer Must Cover Portions of Arbitration Award
Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City
North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage,” Allocation and Exhaustion-Related Issues Arising Out of Benzene-Related Claims
CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities
Under the Hood of U.S. Construction Spending Is Revised Data
Avoid L&I Violations by Following Appropriate Safety Procedures
How is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?
Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives First Tier Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports
Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls
Wage Theft Investigations and Citations in the Construction Industry
The Cross-Party Exclusion: The Hazards of Additional Named Insured Provisions
Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals
MBIA Seeks Data in $1 Billion Credit Suisse Mortgage Suit
Is it time for a summer tune-up?
How the Pandemic Pushed the Construction Industry Five Years Into the Future
Texas Approves Law Ensuring Fair and Open Competition
White and Williams LLP Recognized on the List of Largest Law Firms in Greater Philadelphia
Construction Defect Disputes: Know Your Measure of Damages!!!!!
Traub Lieberman Attorneys Burks Smith and Katie Keller Win Daubert Motion Excluding Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony in the Middle District of Florida
New Jersey Law Firm Announces $4 Million Settlement from Construction Site Accident
Handshake Deals Gone Wrong
ASCE Statement on House Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024
Builder Exposes 7 Myths regarding Millennials and Housing
“Families First Coronavirus Response Act”: Emergency Paid Leave for Construction Employers with Fewer Than 500 Employees
New York Appellate Division Reverses Denial of Landlord’s Additional Insured Tender
Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion
A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws
Colorado’s Need for Condos May Spark Construction Defect Law Reform
Will the YIMBY ‘Holy Grail’ Deliver an LA Building Boom?
Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim
Illinois Insureds are Contesting One Carrier's Universal Denial to Covid-19 Losses
New Jersey Construction Company Owner and Employees Arrested for Fraud
2021 Real Estate Trends: New Year, New Reality—A Day of Reckoning for Borrowers and Tenants
Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!
Floating Cities May Be One Answer to Rising Sea Levels
Improvements to Confederate Monuments Lead to Lawsuits
Florida’s “Groundbreaking” Property Insurance Reform Law
Let’s Get Surety Podcast – #126 Building the Future: AI, Construction and Law
GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court
Aecmaster’s Digital Twin: A New Era for Building Design
The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison
Claim Preclusion: The Doctrine Everyone Thinks They Know But No One Really Knows What it Means in Practice
Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor
Florida’s New Civil Remedies Act – Bulletpoints As to How It Impacts Construction
op="name">Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies the Litigation Waiver of the One-Action RuleInsured's Experts Excluded, But Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment DeniedInsurer’s Optional Appeals Process Does Not Toll Statute of Limitations Following Unequivocal Written DenialReasonableness of Denial of Requests for Admission Based Upon Expert’s Opinions Depends On Factors Within Party’s UnderstandingHurricane Harvey: Understanding the Insurance Aspects, Immediate Actions for Risk ManagersCOVID-19 Business Closure and Continuity Compliance ResourceManhattan Trophy Home Sellers Test Buyer Limits on PriceWhite and Williams Announces Lawyer PromotionsOhio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin BuildersCity of Birmingham Countersues Contractor for Incomplete WorkTraub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Sub-Contracted Electrical CompanyIn Florida, Component Parts of an Improvement to Real Property are Subject to the Statute of Repose for Products Liability ClaimsAppraisal Panel Can Determine Causation of Loss under Ohio LawSeyfarth’s Construction and Government Contracts Teams Named 2024 Practice Groups of the Year by Law360
