BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Hart County Kentucky parking structure expert witness Hart County Kentucky low-income housing expert witness Hart County Kentucky structural steel construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky institutional building expert witness Hart County Kentucky industrial building expert witness Hart County Kentucky custom homes expert witness Hart County Kentucky multi family housing expert witness Hart County Kentucky landscaping construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky mid-rise construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky retail construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky housing expert witness Hart County Kentucky tract home expert witness Hart County Kentucky custom home expert witness Hart County Kentucky condominium expert witness Hart County Kentucky condominiums expert witness Hart County Kentucky townhome construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky Subterranean parking expert witness Hart County Kentucky hospital construction expert witness Hart County Kentucky concrete tilt-up expert witness Hart County Kentucky casino resort expert witness Hart County Kentucky Medical building expert witness Hart County Kentucky
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hart County, Kentucky

    Kentucky Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 289, KRS 41.250, KY Acts 123) Construction professionals are not liable for acts or omissions of a person other than const professional or his agent, employee or subcontractor; failure of others to take reasonable action to reduce the damages or maintain the residence; normal wear, tear, or deterioration; normal shrinkage, swelling, expansion, or settlement; construction defect disclosed to claimant before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hart County Kentucky

    No state license for general contracting. License required for plumbing, and HVAC.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Hopkins County Home Builders Association
    Local # 1830
    PO Box 1092
    Madisonville, KY 42431
    http://www.hopkinscountyhba.com

    Three Rivers Home Builders Association
    Local # 1850
    PO Box 294
    Marion, KY 42064


    Kentucky River Home Builders Chapter
    Local # 1815
    PO Box 1596
    Hazard, KY 41702


    Home Builders Association of Eastern Kentucky
    Local # 1809
    154 Evergreen Ln
    Pikeville, KY 41501


    Southeastern Kentucky Home Builders Association
    Local # 1880
    205 S Broadway St
    Berea, KY 40403
    http://www.sekyhba.com

    Home Builders Association of the Bluegrass
    Local # 1805
    105 Cottage Manor
    Danville, KY 40422


    Lake Cumberland Home Builders Association
    Local # 1887
    PO Box 794
    Somerset, KY 42502



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hart County Kentucky

    Bally's Secures Funding for $1.7B Chicago Casino and Hotel Project

    2021 Real Estate Trends: New Year, New Reality—A Day of Reckoning for Borrowers and Tenants

    Be Proactive Now: Commercial Construction Quickly Joining List of Industries Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks

    Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase

    COVID-19 Vaccine Considerations for Employers in the Construction Industry

    Business Insurance Names Rachel Hudgins Among 2024 Break Out Award Winners

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    N.J. Governor Fires Staff at Authority Roiled by Patronage Hires

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    Conversations with My Younger Self: 5 Things I Wish I Knew Then

    Aging-in-Place Features Becoming Essential for Many Home Buyers

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Based on New Information …”

    Judge Sentences Roofing Contractor Owner in Florida PPP Fraud Case

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    Google’s Floating Mystery Boxes Solved?

    Thank Your Founding Fathers for Mechanic’s Liens

    Elyria, Ohio, to Invest $250M to Halt Illegal Sewage into Black River

    Haight Lawyers Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019

    Traub Lieberman Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Wins Summary Judgment

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”

    In Pennsylvania, Contractors Can Be Liable to Third Parties for Obvious Defects in Completed Work

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    Sacramento’s Commercial Construction Market Heats Up

    Contractor Wins in Arbitration Only to Lose Before the Superior Court on Section 7031 Claim

    Surety’s Several Liability Under Bonds

    Potential Coverage Issues Implicated by the Champlain Towers Collapse

    Georgia Supreme Court Addresses Anti-Indemnity Statute

    "Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In Montana

    Ask (OSHA) and You Shall Receive? DOL Expands Opinion Letter Program for OSHA and Other DOL Agencies

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    One Way Arbitration Provisions are Enforceable in Virginia

    Who Would Face Liability For Oroville Dam Management: Brett Moore Authors Law360 Article

    Privity Problems Continue for Additional Insureds in the Second Circuit

    No Concrete Answers on Whether Construction Defects Are Occurrences

    “Bee” Careful: Unique Considerations When Negotiating a Bee Storage Lease Agreement

    WA Supreme Court Allows Property Owner to Sue Engineering Firm for Lost Profits

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Texas Approves Law Ensuring Fair and Open Competition

    Construction Defect Settlement in Seattle

    Greystone on Remand Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment To Bar Coverage For Construction Defects

    PPP Loan Extension Ending Aug. 8

    We've Surveyed Video Conferencing Models to See Who Fits the CCPA Bill: Here's What We Found

    WSHB Expands to Philadelphia

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Wes Payne Receives Defense Attorney of the Year Award

    SDV Earns Top Honors from Chambers and Partners USA 2025 Award

    Progress, Property, and Privacy: Discussing Human-Led Infrastructure with Jeff Schumacher

    Breach of a Construction Contract & An Equitable Remedy?

    Who Says You Can’t Choose between Liquidated Damages or Actual Damages?

    State Farm Too Quick To Deny Coverage, Court Rules
    Corporate Profile

    HART COUNTY KENTUCKY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Hart County, Kentucky Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Hart County and the surrounding areas.

    Hart County Kentucky structural engineering expert witnessesHart County Kentucky building envelope expert witnessHart County Kentucky architectural expert witnessHart County Kentucky building code compliance expert witnessHart County Kentucky construction safety expertHart County Kentucky engineering consultantHart County Kentucky multi family design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hart County, Kentucky

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com