BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Raven Kentucky high-rise construction expert witness Raven Kentucky multi family housing expert witness Raven Kentucky production housing expert witness Raven Kentucky parking structure expert witness Raven Kentucky Subterranean parking expert witness Raven Kentucky condominiums expert witness Raven Kentucky casino resort expert witness Raven Kentucky low-income housing expert witness Raven Kentucky office building expert witness Raven Kentucky industrial building expert witness Raven Kentucky tract home expert witness Raven Kentucky landscaping construction expert witness Raven Kentucky housing expert witness Raven Kentucky condominium expert witness Raven Kentucky retail construction expert witness Raven Kentucky custom home expert witness Raven Kentucky structural steel construction expert witness Raven Kentucky concrete tilt-up expert witness Raven Kentucky institutional building expert witness Raven Kentucky Medical building expert witness Raven Kentucky custom homes expert witness Raven Kentucky
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Raven, Kentucky

    Kentucky Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 289, KRS 41.250, KY Acts 123) Construction professionals are not liable for acts or omissions of a person other than const professional or his agent, employee or subcontractor; failure of others to take reasonable action to reduce the damages or maintain the residence; normal wear, tear, or deterioration; normal shrinkage, swelling, expansion, or settlement; construction defect disclosed to claimant before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Raven Kentucky

    No state license for general contracting. License required for plumbing, and HVAC.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lincoln Trail Home Builders Association (KY)
    Local # 1840
    911 N Mulberry St
    Elizabethtown, KY 42701
    http://www.lincolntrailhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Owensboro
    Local # 1872
    3515 Wathens Crossing
    Owensboro, KY 42301
    http://www.hbao.com

    Madison County Home Builders Association
    Local # 1896
    336 Highland Park Dr Ste 2
    Richmond, KY 40475


    Home Builders Association of Central Kentucky
    Local # 1818
    106 Manor Ave
    Bardstown, KY 40004
    http://www.buildersassociationofsouthcentralky.com

    Home Builders Association of the Bluegrass
    Local # 1805
    105 Cottage Manor
    Danville, KY 40422


    Audubon Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 1803
    PO Box 453
    Henderson, KY 42419


    Southeastern Kentucky Home Builders Association
    Local # 1880
    205 S Broadway St
    Berea, KY 40403
    http://www.sekyhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Raven Kentucky

    Chattanooga Bridge Collapse Likely Resulted From Impact

    Wall Failure Due to Construction Defect Says Insurer

    Building Bold and Sustainable: A Talk with James O’Callaghan

    What If There Is a Design Error?

    Bert Hummel Appointed Vice Chair of State Bar of Georgia Bench & Bar Committee

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    First Circuit Finds No Coverage For Subcontracted Faulty Work

    Planned Everglades Reservoir at Center of Spat Between Fla.'s Gov.-Elect, Water Management District

    NEW DEFECT WARRANTY LAWS – Now Applicable to Condominiums and HOAs transitioning from Developer to Homeowner Control. Is Your Community Aware of its Rights Under the New Laws?

    Employee Handbooks—Your First Line of Defense

    Bats, Water, Soil, and Bridges- an Engineer’s dream

    Deadlines Count for Construction Defects in Florida

    Update Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    Affordable Housing, Military Contracts and Mars: 3D Printing Construction Potential Builds

    A Sample Itinerary to get the Most out of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorney Alan Packer Selected to the 2017 Northern California Super Lawyers List

    Give Way or Yield? The Jurisdiction of Your Contract Does Matter! (Law note)

    Report: 2023 NYC Crane Fire and Collapse Caused by Failed Hydraulic Hose

    Mississippi Supreme Court Addresses Earth Movement Exclusion

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Beyond the Executive Orders: Legislative Proposals to Strengthen the U.S. Critical Minerals Supply Chain

    Preparation Is Key: How Condo and Homeowner Associations Can Protect Their Communities Amid Hurricane Season

    White and Williams Obtains Reversal on Appeal of $2.5 Million Verdict Against Electric Utility Company

    Impact of Lis Pendens on Unrecorded Interests / Liens

    Release Language Extended To Successor Entity But Only Covered “Known” Claims

    Colorado Court of Appeals Decides the Triple Crown Case

    Contractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case Dismissed

    Account for the Imposition of Material Tariffs in your Construction Contract

    California Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline to File Anti-SLAPP Motions in Light of Amended Pleadings

    RCW 82.32.655 Tax Avoidance Statute/Speculative Building

    Related’s $1 Billion Los Angeles Project Opens After 15-Year Wait

    White and Williams Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions

    Florida Courts Inundated by Wave of New Lawsuits as Sweeping Tort Reform Appears Imminent

    Five Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers

    Blue Gold: Critical Water for Critical Energy Materials

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024

    Risk Spotter Searches Internal Data Lakes For Loaded Words

    The ‘Sole Option’ Arbitration Provision in Construction Contracts

    Nebraska Court Ruling Backs Latest Keystone XL Pipeline Route

    Sacramento Water Works Recognized as a Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    Five Reasons to Hire Older Workers—and How to Keep Them

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22

    Why Do Construction Companies Fail?

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2024

    Viva La France! 2024 Summer Olympics Construction Features Sustainable Design, Including, Simply Not Building at All

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Increased 5% in Year to June

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Preservationists Want to Save Penn Station. Yes, That Penn Station.

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Seven Practice Areas in 2026 Best Law Firms
    Corporate Profile

    RAVEN KENTUCKY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Raven, Kentucky Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Raven and the surrounding areas.

    Raven Kentucky construction safety expertRaven Kentucky architectural engineering expert witnessRaven Kentucky soil failure expert witnessRaven Kentucky expert witness windowsRaven Kentucky architecture expert witnessRaven Kentucky roofing and waterproofing expert witnessRaven Kentucky slope failure expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Raven, Kentucky

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Buffalo, NY Stadium Work Resumes After Suspects ID'ed in $150K Graffiti Vandalism

    March 17, 2026 —
    Construction work is back on track at Highmark Stadium in Orchard Park, N.Y., after police identifed, but did not arrest two suspects in connection with $150,000 in property damage that paused work for nearly one week at the $2.1 billion stadium project, said the Gilbane Building Cos. and Turner Construction joint venture building it for the National Football League’s Buffalo Bills. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Court Ends Trump Shutdown of NY's $5B Empire Wind, Second Offshore Project Revived

    February 17, 2026 —
    In a much-anticipated decision Jan. 15, the federal district court in Washington, D.C., revoked a construction shutdown ordered by the Trump administration against another major East Coast offshore wind project—the $5-billion Empire Wind underway south of New York City. The project's developer, Norway-based Equinor, won a stay and preliminary injunction in response to its lawsuit and one from the state, which aims to direct most of the project's planned 810 MW of power generation to the city's metro area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com