The Goal Is the Repair, Not the Lawsuit: What Colorado HOA Boards Should Consider Before Suing a Builder
September 08, 2026 —
Gail Gudder - Colorado Construction Litigation BlogFourteen years ago, we cautioned Colorado homeowners associations against a “ready, fire, aim” approach to construction-defect litigation. In
The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation, we suggested a fairly simple proposition: when legitimate construction defects exist, the goal should be to get them repaired. Litigation should be a last resort, not an end in itself.
Much has changed in Colorado construction-defect law since then. But a recent Douglas County case, and significant amendments to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) enacted in 2025, provide good reasons for HOA board members and owners to revisit that basic premise.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gail Gudder, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMs. Gudder may be contacted at
gudder@hhmrlaw.com
White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation
July 27, 2026 —
Craig O'Neill, Lindsay Liebman, Kristen Nichols Wright, Zachary Roth & William Taylor - White and WilliamsWhite and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia.
To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year.
Reprinted courtesy of
Craig O'Neill, White and Williams,
Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams,
Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams,
Zachary Roth, White and Williams and
William Taylor, White and Williams
Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid
September 29, 2026 —
Jack Mayo - ConsensusDocsIntroduction
Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work.
Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLPMr. Mayo may be contacted at
jmayo@joneswalker.com
Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provisions
September 29, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiReversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer, the Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed on whether ensuing losses as defined in the policy were covered. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Ropicky, 2026 Wisc. LEXIS 302 (Wis. July 7, 2026).
The insured suffered damage during a storm on May 11, 2018, when rainwater poured into the home. The insureds gave notice to their insurer, Cincinnati. Upon inspection, Cincinnati determined that water intrusion resulted from multiple construction defects in the home. In the front of the home, water entered through a gap in the stone veneer. The inspector also concluded that the damage from rainwater was not just from the May 11, 2018, storm, but damage had occurred from prior storm events.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals
June 08, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordA $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction
July 13, 2026 —
Anthony LaPlaca & Luke Marston - The Construction SeytIntroduction
On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.
[1]
Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”
[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.
[3]
Reprinted courtesy of
Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and
Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com
Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com
Read the full story...
SB 342 Eliminates the “All-or-Nothing” Rule Under Dreaded Business and Professions Code Section 7031
November 02, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogMost California contractors are aware of dreaded Business and Professions Code section 7031 which has been described even by courts – who typically veer away from ascribing judgment to legislation – as being “harsh[ ],” “draconian” and “unjust.”
For those less familiar with Section 7031, the statute provides two remedies, described as a shield and a sword, against unlicensed contractors who perform work requiring a license. The first, the “shield” also referred to as the “claim preclusion” provision, precludes unlicensed contractors from suing for payment when performing work requiring a license. The second, the “sword” also referred to as the “disgorgement” provision, allows a property owner to sue an unlicensed contractor for disgorgement of all money paid to the unlicensed contractor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®
October 06, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerPHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years.
“Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorney
Are Housing Prices Poised to Fall in Denver?Let the 90-Day Countdown BeginCal/OSHA ETS: Newest Version Effective TodayAI as Co-Counsel: How Litigators Can Leverage AI for Depositions, Experts, and Trial PreparationAnother Colorado Construction Defect Reform Bill DiesManhattan Home Prices Top Pre-Crisis Record on Lux
Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales
Oregon Construction Firm Sued for Construction Defects
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/1/24) – Hybrid Work Technologies, AI in Construction and the Market for Office Buildings
The Pitfalls of Oral Agreements in the Construction Industry
Fraud, the VCPA and Construction Contracts
What Clauses Must a Contract Include?
PATH Station Designed by Architect Known for Beautiful Structures, Defects, and Cost Overruns
Retired Judge Claims Asbestos in Courthouse gave him Cancer
Fifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case
Dave McLain named Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants for 2019
Cybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses
Texas Legislative Update: Breaking Down the New Texas Laws Impacting Construction
The Privilege Is All Mine: California Appellate Court Finds Law Firm Holds Attorney Work Product Privilege Applicable to Documents Created by Formerly Employed Attorney
Pay-if-Paid Clauses, Nasty, but Enforceable
Standard Lifetime Shingle Warranties Aren’t Forever
The Connecticut Appellate Court Decides That Construction Contractor Was Not Obligated To Continue Accelerated Schedule to Mitigate Its Damages Following Late Delivery of Materials by Supplier
No Cross-Complaint Needed - Court of Appeal Clarifies Co-Defendants May Oppose Each Other’s Summary Judgment Motions Without a Cross-Complaint
Alleged Defective Water Pump Leads to 900K in Damages
The Need to Be Specific and Precise in Drafting Settling Agreements
House Passes ABC-Supported Permitting Reform Legislation
Yellowstone Park Aims for Quick Reopening After Floods
Insurer's Late Notice Defense Fails on Summary Judgment
What Do I Do With This Stuff? Dealing With Abandoned Property After Foreclosure
BLOK, a Wired UK Hottest 100 Housing Market Startup, Gets Funding from a Renowned Group of Investors
Design Professional Asserting Copyright Infringement And Contributory Copyright Infringement
Insurance Law Alert: Incorporation of Defective Work Does Not Result in Covered Property Damage in California Construction Claims
Immigrants' Legal Status Eyed Over Roles in New York Fake Injury Lawsuits
Dispute Erupts Into Public Over Castro Theater Rehab Project Costs
Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant
The “Your Work” Exclusion—Is there a Trend against Coverage?
BOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted Attraction
New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction
Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey
Crane Firm Pulled Off NYC Projects Following Multiple Incidents
Changes to the Federal Rules – 2024
Insurer Sued for Altering Policies after Claim
ASCE Statement on Biden Administration Permitting Action Plan
Government Claiming Contract Is Void Ab Initio by Contractor Knowingly Making False Statements
Georgia Supreme Court Limits Damages Under Georgia Computer Systems Protection Act
2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available
More Musings From the Mediation Trenches
Settlement Reached in California Animal Shelter Construction Defect Case
New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event
How Technology Reduces the Risk of Façade Defects
U.S. Supreme Court Weighs in on Construction Case
Account for the Imposition of Material Tariffs in your Construction Contract
Agree First or it May Cost You Later
ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict on Covered Property Loss
Engineer at Flint Negligence Trial Details Government Water Errors
