What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…
August 24, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesFlorida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy:
Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Function Over Form: Eighth Circuit Narrows Application of Cosmetic Damage Exclusion
October 12, 2026 —
Ali Jamwal - SDV FenchurchIntroduction
In a significant decision for policyholders, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit adopted a narrow interpretation of an exclusion for cosmetic roof damage caused by wind or hail.
[1] The court held that for a cosmetic damage exclusion to apply, an insurer must prove that the roof’s ability to function as a barrier to the elements is not impaired as compared to its functionality prior to the loss or damage.
Background
In April 2022, a hailstorm struck the insured school buildings causing indentations in the buildings’ metal roofs. The hail did not puncture the roofs’ metal, and no leaks were reported. The insurer denied the claim based on the policy’s cosmetic damage exclusion, which precluded coverage for “cosmetic damage to roof surfacing caused by wind and/or hail.” Cosmetic damage was defined as “superficial damage that altered the appearance of the roof surfacing, but such damage does not prevent the roof from continuing to function as a barrier to entrance of the elements to the same extent as it did before.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ali Jamwal, SDV FenchurchMr. Jamwal may be contacted at
ali.jamwal@sdvfenchurch.us
Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem
September 08, 2026 —
Owen Newman - Construction ExecutiveThis is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects.
An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist.
Reprinted courtesy of
Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...Mr. Newman may be contacted at
oknewman@duanemorris.com
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls
September 08, 2026 —
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogIn our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
- In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
- Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
- A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team
Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe
June 23, 2026 —
Garret D. Murai - California Construction Law BlogEven for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing?
Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers.
This was the case in
R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners
July 27, 2026 —
Amanda E. McKinlay - Snell & WilmerOn April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024.
Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & WilmerMs. McKinlay may be contacted at
amckinlay@swlaw.com
Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value
August 16, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026).
A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Achieving Sustainability Through Design-Build Delivery: Part I – An Overview
September 21, 2026 —
Joshua M. Pruett, Jennifer L. Harris & Tiffany A. Harrod - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.This article was written for the AGC’s Law in Brief and first appeared here.
Sustainability is no longer optional. What was once a matter of public policy or corporate preference has become a regulatory mandate and is reshaping how construction projects are designed, built, and operated. This mandate is not solely figurative. Rather, states have started to follow Europe’s lead by beginning to codify sustainability requirements into regulations and law. California led the charge by adding mandatory embodied-carbon emissions regulations into CALGreen, and other states, such as New York, have introduced bills to implement similar requirem
New Iowa Law Revises Construction Defects Statute of ReposeCybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing BusinessesReminder: In Court (as in life) the Worst Thing You Can Do Is Not Show UpBWB&O Expands to North San DiegoBreaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In CaliforniaGeorgia Coal-to-Solar Pivot Shows the Way on Climate RegsTodd Seelman Recognized as Fellow of Wisconsin Law FoundationNext Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California WildfiresParking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction DefectWorkplace Safety–the Unpreventable Employee Misconduct DefenseCourt Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Cov
Shoring of Ceiling Does Not Constitute Collapse Under Policy's Definition
Payne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2025 Best Law Firms®
Asbestos Exclusion Bars Coverage
Properly Trigger the Performance Bond
Insurer’s Discovery Requests Ruled to be Overbroad in Construction Defect Suit
Are You Taking Full Advantage of Available Reimbursements for Assisting Injured Workers?
Time is of the Essence, Even When the Contract Doesn’t Say So
How I Prevailed on a Remote Jury Trial
St Louis County Approves Settlement in Wrongful Death Suit
2023’s Bank Failures: What Contractors, Material Suppliers and Equipment Lessors Can Do to Protect Themselves
Transplants Send Nashville Home Market Upwards
The Regulations on the Trump Administration's Chopping Block
Insurer Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Under Unjust Enrichment Theory
More (and Simpler) Options Under New Oregon Retention Law
Reconciling Prompt Payments and Withholding of Retention Payments
Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2023
Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim
Defining Construction Defects
California Committee Hosts a Hearing on Deadly Berkeley Balcony Collapse
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Right of a Party to Oppose Summary Judgment Motions - Even Without Cross-Claims
Contractor Turns Former Sears Into Interim High School Following Palisades Wildfires
Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System
HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team
Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement
Insurer Fails to Establish Prejudice Due to Late Notice
The Rubber Hits the Ramp: A Maryland Personal Injury Case
Newmeyer & Dillion Selected to 2017 OCBJ’s Best Places to Work List
Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!
Approaches to Managing Job Site Inventory
Coverage Found for Faulty Workmanship Damaging Other Property
Congratulations to Partner Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Nevada!
Century Communities Acquires Dunhill Homes Las Vegas Operations
California Senator Proposes Bill to Require Contractors to Report Construction Defect Cases
Resulting Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage
68 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 5th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America
Seeking Better Peer Reviews After the FIU Bridge Collapse
Did You Get a Notice of Mechanic’s Lien after Project Completion? Don’t Panic!
NJ Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision that Exxon Has No Duty to Indemnify Insurers for Environmental Liability Under Prior Settlement Agreement
Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows
Mediation v. Arbitration, Both Private Dispute Resolution but Very Different Sorts
The End of Eroding Limits Policies in Nevada is Just the Beginning
California Supreme Court Confirms the Right to Repair Act as the Exclusive Remedy for Seeking Relief for Defects in New Residential Construction
Nine Gibbs Giden Partners Listed in Southern California Super Lawyers 2022
Why Employees Are Taking Ownership of Their Architecture Firms
MapLab: Why More Americans Are Moving Toward Wildfire
Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”
NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City
Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®
Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident
Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss
