BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Branch County Michigan tract home expert witness Branch County Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Branch County Michigan hospital construction expert witness Branch County Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Branch County Michigan condominiums expert witness Branch County Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Branch County Michigan casino resort expert witness Branch County Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Branch County Michigan parking structure expert witness Branch County Michigan condominium expert witness Branch County Michigan industrial building expert witness Branch County Michigan institutional building expert witness Branch County Michigan retail construction expert witness Branch County Michigan office building expert witness Branch County Michigan low-income housing expert witness Branch County Michigan production housing expert witness Branch County Michigan Medical building expert witness Branch County Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Branch County Michigan custom homes expert witness Branch County Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Branch County Michigan townhome construction expert witness Branch County Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Branch County, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Branch County Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Lenawee County
    Local # 2308
    PO Box 119 136 E. Maumee St.
    Adrian, MI 49221
    http://lenaweecountyhba.com

    Southwestern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2305
    107 W Ferry St
    Berrien Springs, MI 49103
    http://www.swmhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Monroe County
    Local # 2366
    1645 N. Dixie Hwy
    Monroe, MI 48162
    http://www.hbamonroe.com

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2344
    1815 E High St
    Jackson, MI 49203
    http://www.hbaofjacksonmichigan.com

    Builders and Remodelers Association of Greater Ann Arbor
    Local # 2304
    179 Little Lake Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    http://www.hbawc.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Kalamazoo
    Local # 2348
    5700 W Michigan Ave
    Kalamazoo, MI 49009
    http://www.kalamazoohomepage.com

    Battle Creek Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2312
    P.O. Box 2197
    Battle Creek, MI 49016
    http://www.bcahb.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Branch County Michigan

    CDJ’s #10 Topic of the Year: Transport Insurance Company v. Superior Court (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 1216.

    Supreme Court of Wisconsin Applies Pro Rata Allocation Based on Policy Limits to Co-Insurance Dispute

    Court Orders House to be Demolished or Relocated

    Changes in the Law on Lien Waivers

    Extreme Heat, Smoke Should Get US Disaster Label, Groups Say

    New Index Tracking Mortgages for New Homes

    Rise in Home Building Helps Other Job Sectors

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Congratulations to Jonathan Kaplan on his Promotion to Partner!

    Developer Sues TVA After It Halts Nuke Site Sale

    The Court of Appeals Holds That Indifference to Safety Satisfies the Standard for a Willful Violation Under WISHA

    Patti Santelle Honored by Rutgers School of Law with Arthur E. Armitage Sr. Distinguished Alumni Award

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Insurance Firm Defends against $22 Million Claim

    Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws

    Extreme Weather Events Show Why the Construction Supply Chain Needs a Risk-Management Transformation

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC Announces Leadership Changes and New Vision for Growth

    Dynamics of Managing Professional Liability Claims for Design Builders

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    Contract Change #1- Insurance in the A201 (law note)

    Asserting Non-Disclosure Claim Involving Residential Real Property and Whether Facts Are “Readily Observable”

    Construction Contract Negotiation & Drafting: A Practical Checklist (and Where State-Specific Issues Can Surprise You)

    Litigation Counsel of America Honors Partner Victor Anderson with Peter Perlman Award

    New York Assembly Reconsiders ‘Bad Faith’ Bill

    Surety Bond Now a Valid Performance Guarantee for NC Developers (guest post)

    How to Build Climate Change-Resilient Infrastructure

    Gain in Home Building Points to Sustained U.S. Growth

    No Duty to Defend Additional Insured for Construction Defects

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Known Loss Doctrine & Interpretation of “Occurrence”

    Mediation Clause Can Stay a Miller Act Claim, Just Not Forever

    HHMR Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Client in Wrongful Death Lawsuit over Construction Incident

    The Rise of Modular Construction – Impacts for Consideration

    Fifth Circuit Confirms: Insurer Must Defend Despite Your Work/Your Product Exclusion

    Oregon Construction Firm Sued for Construction Defects

    Sept. 11 Victims Rejected by U.S. High Court on Lawsuit

    Project-Specific Policies and Products-Completed Operations Hazard Extensions

    Can a Receiver Prime and Strip Liens Against Real Property?

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    PSA: Virginia Repeals Its Permanent COVID-19 Safety Standard

    Insured’s Bad Faith Insurance Claim Evaporates Before its Eyes

    Unjust Enrichment Damages Must Be Measurable and Quantifiable

    Statutory Bad Faith and an Insured’s 60 Day Notice to Cure

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Professional Services Exclusion in CGL Policies

    Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

    Four Common Construction Contracts

    After Restoring Power in North Carolina, Contractor Faces Many Claims
    Corporate Profile

    BRANCH COUNTY MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Branch County, Michigan Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Branch County and the surrounding areas.

    Branch County Michigan construction claims expert witnessBranch County Michigan soil failure expert witnessBranch County Michigan reconstruction expert witnessBranch County Michigan roofing and waterproofing expert witnessBranch County Michigan construction expert witnessBranch County Michigan slope failure expert witnessBranch County Michigan expert witness roofing
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Branch County, Michigan

    Rebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year Later

    January 26, 2026 —
    As wildfires, and subsequent mudslides become more frequent and destructive across Los Angeles, rebuilding efforts must go beyond policy reform to address a critical, often overlooked challenge: the condition of the land itself. Mayor Karen Bass’ recent executive actions–streamlining approvals, reducing fees and allowing rebuilt homes to be up to 10% larger–mark meaningful progress in cutting red tape. But while these changes may make rebuilding easier on paper, difficulties remain hidden beneath the rubble. Before the Blueprint, the Groundwork In hillside neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades, where entire communities have been reduced to ash, rebuilding does not only begin with drawings or permits–it may begin with stabilizing the land. Many of the coastal and hillside neighborhoods are naturally unstable, and since many homes were built prior to 1956–pre-codification of artificial fill for building pads–slope reinforcement, soil replacement, deep foundation systems, engineered grading or some other forms of mitigation are required. These measures are not only time-intense and highly technical, but they are also expensive and often not covered by insurance. Reprinted courtesy of Zoltan Pali, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    White and Williams LLP is Proud to Host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace Award and Reception

    May 05, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace (VBW) Award and Reception, which will celebrate this year’s honoree, The Rendell Center for Civics & Civic Engagement. This award was created to celebrate the remarkable career of Virginia “Ginny” Barton Wallace, the first woman to be elected to partnership not only at White and Williams but also at any law firm in Philadelphia. The VBW Award is presented to a woman or organization that embodies the same qualities that Ginny possessed: leadership, drive, exemplary work ethic, overall excellence in her field, or an ability to inspire other women to succeed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Yet Another Reason That Your Contract Matters

    February 10, 2026 —
    I have discussed on several occasions the fact that construction contracts matter. The words in contracts matter and, in Virginia (as well as other states), most provisions, if not all will be enforced to the letter. Recently, the Western District of Virginia federal court ruled in a way that reminded me of another reason for a well-drafted contract. In Rockingham Precast, Inc. v. American Infrastructure – Maryland, Inc. the Western District of Virginia Court considered a motion to transfer the venue to Maryland filed by American Infrastructure. The plaintiff, Rockingham Precast, a Virginia-based company sued in Virginia. American Infrastructure conceded that VA could be a proper forum for the lawsuit but argued that the form was much too inconvenient and costly for the party and non-party witnesses and that the cost made the forum an unfair place to try the case. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    May 26, 2026 —
    Brenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction. Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    February 23, 2026 —
    Sheppard successfully defended client Mitchelville Real Estate Group and its non-profit development partner Bernal Heights Housing Corporation in an appeal of a 70-unit, 100% affordable senior housing development at 3333 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Bernal Heights neighborhood. The team secured approval of the project, representing the developer on complex land use issues including split zoning, SB 35, the State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Crisis Act, tribal cultural resources and the Subdivision Map Act. Although the ministerially approved parcel map for the project utilized SB 35, it was appealed to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and unanimously rejected. Sheppard’s real estate transactional team also assisted with the acquisition of the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard