BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Cass County Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Cass County Michigan low-income housing expert witness Cass County Michigan hospital construction expert witness Cass County Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Cass County Michigan retail construction expert witness Cass County Michigan condominium expert witness Cass County Michigan custom home expert witness Cass County Michigan industrial building expert witness Cass County Michigan housing expert witness Cass County Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Cass County Michigan parking structure expert witness Cass County Michigan condominiums expert witness Cass County Michigan tract home expert witness Cass County Michigan townhome construction expert witness Cass County Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Cass County Michigan multi family housing expert witness Cass County Michigan office building expert witness Cass County Michigan custom homes expert witness Cass County Michigan casino resort expert witness Cass County Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Cass County Michigan Medical building expert witness Cass County Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cass County, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cass County Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Lenawee County
    Local # 2308
    PO Box 119 136 E. Maumee St.
    Adrian, MI 49221
    http://lenaweecountyhba.com

    Southwestern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2305
    107 W Ferry St
    Berrien Springs, MI 49103
    http://www.swmhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Monroe County
    Local # 2366
    1645 N. Dixie Hwy
    Monroe, MI 48162
    http://www.hbamonroe.com

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2344
    1815 E High St
    Jackson, MI 49203
    http://www.hbaofjacksonmichigan.com

    Builders and Remodelers Association of Greater Ann Arbor
    Local # 2304
    179 Little Lake Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    http://www.hbawc.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Kalamazoo
    Local # 2348
    5700 W Michigan Ave
    Kalamazoo, MI 49009
    http://www.kalamazoohomepage.com

    Battle Creek Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2312
    P.O. Box 2197
    Battle Creek, MI 49016
    http://www.bcahb.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cass County Michigan

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    There Is No Sympathy If You Fail to Read Closely the Final Negotiated Construction Contract

    California Supreme Court Rules Developers can be Required to Include Affordable Housing

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    As Laura Wreaks Havoc Along The Gulf, Is Your Insurance Ready to Respond?

    Home Numbers Remain Small While Homes Get Bigger

    New FAR Rule Mandates the Use of PLAs on Large Construction Projects

    White and Williams Defeats Policyholder’s Attempt to Invalidate Asbestos Exclusions

    From the Ashes: Reconstructing After the Maui Wildfire

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Court Finds Duty To Defend Environmental Claim, But Defense Limited to $100,000

    Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Texas Court Finds Construction Defect Claims Were Inherently Undiscoverable, Tolls Statute of Limitations

    Subprime Bonds Are Back With Different Name Seven Years After U.S. Crisis

    Construction Defect Class Action Lawsuit Alleges National Cover-up of Pipe Defects

    Empire State Building Owners Sue Photographer for Topless Photo Shoot

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    COVID-19 Impacts on Subcontractor Default Insurance and Ripple Effects

    Georgia Super Lawyers Recognized Two Lawyers from Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Group

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    Judge Gives Cintra Bid Protest of $9B Md. P3 Project Award New Life

    Committeewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal Efforts

    Building Bold and Sustainable: A Talk with James O’Callaghan

    Aecmaster’s Digital Twin: A New Era for Building Design

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Professional Liability and Attorney-Client Privilege Bulletin: Intra-Law Firm Communications

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    Fast-Moving Isaias Dishes Out Disruption in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast

    Rebuilding After the 2025 Southern California Fires

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Engineer Proposes Slashing Scope of Millennium Tower Pile Upgrade

    Court Holds That One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims Under B&P Section 7031

    SIG Earnings Advance 21% as U.K. Construction Strengthens

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    Judge Tells DOL to Cork its Pistol as New Overtime Rule is Blocked

    Ruling Closes the Loop on Restrictive Additional Insured Endorsement – Reasonable Expectations of Insured Builder Prevails Over Intent of Insurer

    New York's New Gateway: The Overhaul of John F. Kennedy International Airport

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standard for Imposing Spoliation Sanctions

    Small to Midsize Builders Making Profit on Overlooked Lots

    2023’s Bank Failures: What Contractors, Material Suppliers and Equipment Lessors Can Do to Protect Themselves

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Contractor Convicted of Additional Fraud

    At Long Last, the Colorado Legislature Gets Serious About Construction Defect Reform – In a Constructive Way

    Power Point Presentation on Nautilus v. Lexington Case

    UK Construction Output Rises Unexpectedly to Strongest Since May

    Seeking Better Peer Reviews After the FIU Bridge Collapse

    Illinois Court Addresses Level of Evidence Necessary to Prevent Summary Judgment in Hail Damage Claim

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses
    Corporate Profile

    CASS COUNTY MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Cass County, Michigan Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house assets which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Cass County construction industry.

    Cass County Michigan construction expertsCass County Michigan construction expert testimonyCass County Michigan slope failure expert witnessCass County Michigan building consultant expertCass County Michigan forensic architectCass County Michigan construction claims expert witnessCass County Michigan multi family design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cass County, Michigan

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    March 17, 2026 —
    We congratulate our four Payne & Fears attorneys who have been named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. This recognition highlights the next generation of legal talent, honoring attorneys who have made a strong impact in their practice areas early in their careers. Employment & Labor Taylor Brown Bree Oswald Employment Litigation: Defense Tyler Runge Business Litigation Brian Shaw Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    April 27, 2026 —
    A $16.9-million claim for work on a hospital addition by a joint venture of contractors Modern Building Co. and Sundt Construction is stuck and delayed indefinitely following the California hospital's December bankruptcy filing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Cal Unity Bar Names Angela Zanin as Statewide President

    August 11, 2026 —
    The California Unity Bar has named Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin as its statewide president for the 2026-2027 term. This appointment follows Ms. Zanin's extensive involvement in the organization, including as the founding co-chair of the Los Angeles County Unity Bar in 2024 and as its chair for the 2024-2025 term. Ms. Zanin also has served as a member of the Executive Steering Committee of the California Unity Bar since 2025. In her inaugural message as president, which the Cal Unity Bar published in its newsletter of July 2026, Ms. Zanin stated that she vowed to continue the organization’s “commitment to promoting equal opportunities and embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the State of California.” She also noted that as she assumed the role of president, she thought of “the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”’ Ms. Zanin closed her message by observing, “At a time when the rule of law faces challenges, our alliance stands strong, built on trust and confidence in each other.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    A New Vision for Safety: Construction Safety Week’s Five-Year Plan

    February 17, 2026 —
    Construction Safety Week has long been a powerful show of force—a catalyst for bringing the industry together and focusing on the critical importance of health and safety. Over the last decade, we’ve made meaningful strides: advancing best practices, transitioning from hard hats to helmets, shedding light on vital issues such as mental health, fostering a culture of care and accountability and creating partnerships and initiatives that improve jobsite safety. Building on the progress we’ve made, we’ve launched a bold five-year vision to bring everyone together with trust and respect and to drive alignment in how safety is understood, owned and engineered at every step of the project. This is an industrywide effort to further deepen the culture of care centered around respect for the skilled craft and through all aspects of a project where all team members share this responsibility, this respect, across every phase: design, planning, construction and beyond. Reprinted courtesy of Adam Jelen, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    End of an (Endangerment) Era

    February 23, 2026 —
    On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the repeal of the 2009 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and the elimination of all federal GHG emission standards for motor vehicles and engines.1 The EPA characterized the action as the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.”2 This development marks a fundamental shift in federal climate policy under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and is expected to trigger immediate and extensive litigation. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court held that GHGs qualify as “air pollutants” under the CAA and that the EPA must determine whether emissions from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare under CAA Section 202(a).3 Following this decision, on December 7, 2009, the EPA issued two findings. First, the EPA classified six different GHGs as threatening public health and welfare. Second, the EPA determined that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to that endangerment.4 Although the findings themselves imposed no direct regulatory requirements, they served as the legal predicate for GHG emission standards for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and later for other CAA programs affecting statutory sources. In 2012, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the Endangerment Finding and related regulations.5 Reprinted courtesy of Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com Read the full story...