BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Inkster Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Inkster Michigan townhome construction expert witness Inkster Michigan tract home expert witness Inkster Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Inkster Michigan low-income housing expert witness Inkster Michigan parking structure expert witness Inkster Michigan custom home expert witness Inkster Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Inkster Michigan multi family housing expert witness Inkster Michigan office building expert witness Inkster Michigan custom homes expert witness Inkster Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Inkster Michigan production housing expert witness Inkster Michigan casino resort expert witness Inkster Michigan retail construction expert witness Inkster Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Inkster Michigan hospital construction expert witness Inkster Michigan Medical building expert witness Inkster Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Inkster Michigan industrial building expert witness Inkster Michigan housing expert witness Inkster Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Inkster, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Inkster Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greater Kalamazoo
    Local # 2348
    5700 W Michigan Ave
    Kalamazoo, MI 49009
    http://www.kalamazoohomepage.com

    Builders and Remodelers Association of Greater Ann Arbor
    Local # 2304
    179 Little Lake Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    http://www.hbawc.com

    Battle Creek Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2312
    P.O. Box 2197
    Battle Creek, MI 49016
    http://www.bcahb.org/

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2344
    1815 E High St
    Jackson, MI 49203
    http://www.hbaofjacksonmichigan.com

    Home Builders Association of Livingston County
    Local # 2355
    132 E Grand River Ave
    Brighton, MI 48116
    http://www.hbalc.com

    Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
    Local # 2328
    2075 Walnut Lake Road
    West Bloomfield, MI 48323
    http://www.builders.org

    Home Builders Association of Monroe County
    Local # 2366
    1645 N. Dixie Hwy
    Monroe, MI 48162
    http://www.hbamonroe.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Inkster Michigan

    “Positive Limiting Barriers” Are An Open and Obvious Condition, Relieving Owner of Duty to Warn

    Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects

    NEW DEFECT WARRANTY LAWS – Now Applicable to Condominiums and HOAs transitioning from Developer to Homeowner Control. Is Your Community Aware of its Rights Under the New Laws?

    Circuit Court Lacks Appellate Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Appraisal

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant

    David Samani Joins BHBA Podcast on Mediation Best Practices

    Negligence Claim Not Barred by Gist of the Action Doctrine

    How to Drop a New Building on Top of an Old One

    Contractual Impartiality Requires an Appraiser to be Unbiased, Disinterested, and Unswayed by Personal Interest

    3D Printing: A New Era in Concrete Construction

    Traub Lieberman Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Wins Summary Judgment

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance Premiums

    Is Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? It Is if You Don’t Object

    Ninth Circuit Resolves Federal-State Court Split Regarding Whether 'Latent' Defects Discovered After Duration of Warranty Period are Actionable under California's Lemon Law Statute

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    Traub Lieberman Partner Stephen Straus Wins Spoliation Motion in Favor of Defendant

    Suit Limitation Provisions in New York

    Fatal Boston Garage Demolition Leaves Long Road to Recovery

    More Regulations for Federal Contractors

    Coronavirus and Contract Obligations

    Federal Subcontractor Who Failed to Follow FAR Regulations Finds That “Fair” and “Just” are Not Synonymous

    Congratulations to Newport Beach Partner Tyler D. Offenhauser and Associate Therese M. Ellis for Securing a Dismissal on a Premises Liability and Negligence Case!

    Good-To-Know Points Regarding (I) Miller Act Payment Bonds And (Ii) Payment Bond Surety Compelling Arbitration

    Los Angeles Office Secures Summary Judgment for Electric Company Client in Asbestos Lawsuit

    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    How a $1,400 Humanoid Hints at Construction’s Robotic Future

    Think Twice About Depreciating Repair Costs in Our State, says the Tennessee Supreme Court

    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Honors Construction Attorney

    Are Construction Defect Laws a Factor in Millennials Home Buying Decisions?

    Invest In America Act Offers 494 Billion In Funding to U.S. Infrastructure and Millions of New Jobs

    Environmental Roundup – May 2019

    New EPA Regulation for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

    Construction Payment Remedies: You May be Able to Skate by, But Why?

    Fatal Crane Collapse in Seattle Prompts Questions About Disassembly Procedures

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian Claims

    The Future of Construction Tech Is Decision Tech

    Hawaiian Electric Finalizes $2 Billion Maui Fire Settlement

    Allegations Confirm Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Dispute Resolution in Your Construction Contract

    JD Supra’s 2017 Reader’s Choice Awards

    Boys (and Girls) of Summer: New Residential Solar Energy System Disclosures Take Effect January 1, 2019

    A Court-Side Seat: Clean Air, Clean Water, Endangered Species and Deliberative Process Privilege

    School District Client Advisory: Civility is not an Option, It is a Duty

    Musk’s Cousins Battle Utilities to Make Solar Rooftops Cheap

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    The Show Must Go On: Navigating Arbitration in the Wake of the COVID-19 Outbreak
    Corporate Profile

    INKSTER MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Inkster, Michigan Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Inkster region.

    Inkster Michigan construction defect expert witnessInkster Michigan testifying construction expert witnessInkster Michigan contractor expert witnessInkster Michigan OSHA expert witness constructionInkster Michigan construction project management expert witnessesInkster Michigan construction safety expertInkster Michigan building code expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Inkster, Michigan

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    11 Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    Congratulations to the 11 Payne & Fears attorneys included in the 2027 Edition of “Lawyer of the Year” and The Best Lawyers In America®. Attorneys have been recognized in the following practice areas: “Lawyer of the Year” (2027 Edition) Orange County
    • Benjamin A. Nix
      • Trade Secrets Law
    The Best Lawyers in America® (2027 Edition) Irvine, CA
    • Jeffrey K. Brown
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel F. Fears
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel M. Livingston
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Litigation – Real Estate
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight leads in recognized Construction Litigation Attorneys

    September 01, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce its leading recognition in the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers magazine. With ten members named, ACS has more recognized Construction Litigation attorneys than any other firm on the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers list, compared to three at the next closest firm. Two ACS members were also recognized on the 2026 Washington Rising Stars list. Super Lawyers selects these recognized lawyers by using a patented multiphase selection process. First, lawyers enter the candidate pool by being nominated by their peers or by being identified by managing partner surveys, third-party feedback, or the Super Lawyersresearch team. Next, Super Lawyersconducts an independently researched evaluation using twelve indicators of professional achievement and peer recognition: verdicts/settlements, transactions, representative clients, experience, honors/awards, special licenses/certifications, position within a law firm, bar and/or professional activity, pro bono and community service, scholarly lectures/writings, education/employment background, and other outstanding achievements. Then, candidates with the highest point totals serve on a Blue Ribbon panel, evaluating other candidates within their primary practice area. Finally, only 5% of attorneys are selected for the Super Lawyers list, and 2.5% of attorneys are selected for the Rising Stars list. More information about the Super Lawyers Selection Process can be found here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com