BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan institutional building expert witness Jackson County Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan low-income housing expert witness Jackson County Michigan casino resort expert witness Jackson County Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Jackson County Michigan parking structure expert witness Jackson County Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan tract home expert witness Jackson County Michigan condominiums expert witness Jackson County Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan multi family housing expert witness Jackson County Michigan housing expert witness Jackson County Michigan condominium expert witness Jackson County Michigan production housing expert witness Jackson County Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Jackson County Michigan custom homes expert witness Jackson County Michigan retail construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan Medical building expert witness Jackson County Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Jackson County Michigan industrial building expert witness Jackson County Michigan custom home expert witness Jackson County Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jackson County, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jackson County Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders and Remodelers Association of Greater Ann Arbor
    Local # 2304
    179 Little Lake Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    http://www.hbawc.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Kalamazoo
    Local # 2348
    5700 W Michigan Ave
    Kalamazoo, MI 49009
    http://www.kalamazoohomepage.com

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2344
    1815 E High St
    Jackson, MI 49203
    http://www.hbaofjacksonmichigan.com

    Battle Creek Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2312
    P.O. Box 2197
    Battle Creek, MI 49016
    http://www.bcahb.org/

    Home Builders Association of Livingston County
    Local # 2355
    132 E Grand River Ave
    Brighton, MI 48116
    http://www.hbalc.com

    Home Builders Association of Monroe County
    Local # 2366
    1645 N. Dixie Hwy
    Monroe, MI 48162
    http://www.hbamonroe.com

    Building Industry Association of Southeastern Michigan
    Local # 2328
    2075 Walnut Lake Road
    West Bloomfield, MI 48323
    http://www.builders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jackson County Michigan

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    A Court-Side Seat – Case Law Update (February 2022)

    Gordie Howe Bridge Project Team Looks for a Third Period Comeback

    TxDOT, Flatiron/Dragados Mostly Resolve Bridge Design Dispute

    Texas Federal Court Delivers Another Big Win for Policyholders on CGL Coverage for Construction-Defect Claims and “Rip-and-Tear” Damages

    Insurance Tips for Contractors

    Economic Damages and the Right to Repair Act: You Can’t Have it Both Ways

    South Caroline Holds Actual Cash Value Can Include Depreciation of Labor Costs

    Andrew Gendron Authors D.C., Maryland Damages Compendium Articles for Defense Counsel Journal’s “Damages Compendium – East of the Mississippi”

    Insurer’s Consent Not Needed for Settlement

    Quick Note: Termination for Convenience Provisions Give a Party Broad Discretion to End a Contractual Relationship

    Texas Public Procurements: What Changed on September 1, 2017? a/k/a: When is the Use of E-Verify Required?

    Project Labor Agreements Will Now Be Required for Large-Scale Federal Construction Projects

    Seyfarth’s Brenda Radmacher Presents at Construction Defect and Insurance Conference

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Consolidated Case With Covered and Uncovered Allegations Triggers Duty to Defend

    The Secret to an OSHA Inspection

    U.S. Homebuilder Confidence Rises Most in Almost a Year

    Colorado Governor Polis’s Executive Order D 2020 101: Keeping Up with Colorado’s Shifting Eviction Landscape during COVID-19

    Arbitration—No Opportunity for Appeal

    Coffee Beans, Mars and the 50 States: Civil Code 1542 Waivers and Latent Defects

    L.A. Makes $4.5 Billion Bet on Olympics After Boston Backs Out

    Spa High-Rise Residents Frustrated by Construction Defects

    California Court of Appeal Makes Short Work Trial Court Order Preventing Party From Supplementing Experts

    Be Careful with “Green” Construction

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    "Your Work" Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Specific Performance: Equitable Remedy to Enforce Affirmative Obligation

    Hirers Must Affirmatively Exercise Retained Control to be Liable Under Hooker Exception to Privette Doctrine

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    Ornate Las Vegas Palace Rented by Michael Jackson for Sale

    Vincent Alexander Named to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite

    Homebuilding in Las Vegas Slows but Doesn’t Fall

    GRSM Ranked Among Top 5 Construction Law Firms by Construction Executive

    Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?

    Designing, Constructing and Converting Data Centers and Crypto Mines

    Increase in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in January

    No Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of Litigation

    Affirmed: Insureds Bear the Burden of Allocating Covered Versus Uncovered Losses

    GRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®

    Lane Construction Sues JV Partner Skanska Over Orlando I-4 Project

    Congratulations to Arizona Managing Partner John Belanger and Associate Ryan Leibel on Securing a Win at Arbitration!

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    Billion-Dollar Power Lines Finally Inching Ahead to Help US Grids

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    Florida’s Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting Appellate Court Decisions on Concurrent Causation

    Boston Team Secures Summary Judgment Dismissal on Client’s Behalf in Serious Personal Injury Case

    New York Appellate Team Obtains Affirmance of Dismissal of Would-Be Labor Law Action Against Municipal Entities

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement
    Corporate Profile

    JACKSON COUNTY MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Jackson County, Michigan Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Jackson County construction industry.

    Jackson County Michigan testifying construction expert witnessJackson County Michigan contractor expert witnessJackson County Michigan construction safety expertJackson County Michigan roofing and waterproofing expert witnessJackson County Michigan consulting engineersJackson County Michigan construction expert witness consultantJackson County Michigan consulting general contractor
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jackson County, Michigan

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Bid Today, Pay a Different Rate Tomorrow? California AB 1198 Changes Prevailing Wage Rules for Large Public Works Projects

    November 09, 2026 —
    Contractors and subcontractors bidding on California’s largest public works projects will soon face a new labor-cost risk: the wage rates they are required to pay may change after they submit their bids. California’s prevailing wage rules generally set the minimum pay for workers on public works projects based on the type of work and the project’s location. Under Assembly Bill 1198 (“AB 1198”), updated prevailing wage rates may apply during construction to public works contracts awarded or advertised for bid after July 1, 2027 if the awarded value of the prime contract is $35 million or more. On those projects, the wage rates that applied when the project was first advertised may not remain the same throughout the work. For contractors pursuing infrastructure projects that take several years to complete, this is not just a payroll issue. A change in required wage rates can affect the cost of work already priced in a bid. Contractors will need to consider that possibility when estimating labor costs, setting aside funds for unexpected costs, obtaining subcontractor prices, and negotiating contract terms that address price increases or changes to the work. Those terms can determine whether the contractor or the public agency awarding the contract bears the additional cost. Contractors will also need processes in place to track wage changes and their effect on project costs. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth and Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    The Great Escape: Non-Invalidation Clauses and Property Damage Claims

    October 20, 2026 —
    At their core, non-invalidation clauses (“NICs”) recognise an important commercial reality: an insured cannot control everything that happens at its premises. In the event that an insured finds itself in breach of a condition or warranty owing to events that have increased the risk of damage to its property, but which were outside its authority, knowledge or beyond its control, a NIC may prevent the insurer from avoiding the claim. For that reason, they’re an important tool in an insured’s coverage arsenal. Although there is relatively little caselaw on NICs, their purpose was recognised in The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2011] EWHC 1761 (Comm) (on which we wrote a previous article – The Good, the Bad & the Ugly: #26 The Good: The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva) Reprinted courtesy of Abigail Smith, SDV Fenchurch and Kaarthiga Manimaran, SDV Fenchurch Ms. Smith may be contacted at abigail.smith@sdvfenchurch.uk Ms. Manimaran may be contacted at kaarthiga.manimaran@sdvfenchurch.uk Read the full story...

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Amazon’s Latest Response to AI Data Center Backlash: $1 Billion

    October 20, 2026 —
    Amazon.com Inc.’s latest attempt to address the intensifying blowback to an unprecedented buildout of computing infrastructure: a commitment to spend more than $1 billion over the next five years on initiatives for the communities near its server farms. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matt Day, Bloomberg

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Nordics Are Europe’s Next Data Center Hub

    October 05, 2026 —
    On September 9, 2026, Google announced its largest single investment in Europe. The company commits at least €13 billion to Finnish data centers and energy infrastructure in 2027 and 2028, expanding the existing Hamina campus and adding three new sites in Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. For the construction sector, this is great news: thousands of hectares, dozens of buildings, and a construction program that will extend well beyond the two-year investment window. Four Sites, One Regional Cluster Google is not a newcomer in Finland. Back in 2009, it converted a former paper mill in Hamina into a seawater-cooled data center. It has invested around €4.5 billion there over 15 years, and the site’s waste heat already feeds Hamina’s district heating network. The new program shifts the center of gravity north, to the border of North Ostrobothnia and Kainuu. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi