BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan parking structure expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan institutional building expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan retail construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan multi family housing expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan low-income housing expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan housing expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan Medical building expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan casino resort expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan condominium expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan tract home expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan custom home expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan townhome construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan office building expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan condominiums expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan hospital construction expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Lake Leelanau Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lake Leelanau, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lake Leelanau Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northeastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2373
    102 South Third
    Alpena, MI 49707
    http://www.nemhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Grand Traverse Area
    Local # 2338
    3040 Sunset Lane
    Traverse City, MI 49684
    http://www.hbagta.com

    Little Traverse Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2362
    455 Bay Street
    Petoskey, MI 49770
    http://www.ltahb.com

    Tri-Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 2363
    1210 Rough Ct
    Roscommon, MI 48653
    http://www.tl-hba.org

    Mid-Northern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2369
    PO Box 128
    Oscoda, MI 48750


    Mid-Eastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2365
    3823 W Wheeler Rd
    Standish, MI 48658


    Builder & Remodelers of Greater Northwest Michigan
    Local # 2357
    PO Box 1062
    Big Rapids, MI 49307
    http://www.hbamc.com/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lake Leelanau Michigan
    Corporate Profile

    LAKE LEELANAU MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Lake Leelanau, Michigan Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house assets which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Lake Leelanau and the surrounding areas.

    Lake Leelanau Michigan OSHA expert witness constructionLake Leelanau Michigan forensic architectLake Leelanau Michigan concrete expert witnessLake Leelanau Michigan architecture expert witnessLake Leelanau Michigan structural concrete expertLake Leelanau Michigan civil engineer expert witnessLake Leelanau Michigan expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lake Leelanau, Michigan

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    March 31, 2026 —
    An older case deals with three important considerations: (1) defective specifications; (2) whether the defective specifications were misleading or misrepresentative; and (3) applying the jury verdict method in quantifying damages. In Metric Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S., 80 Fed. Cl. 178 (Fed. Cl. 2
    Reconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build Method

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies Breadth of Contractual Liability Coverage

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Be Proactive Now: Commercial Construction Quickly Joining List of Industries Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks

    #6 CDJ Topic: Construction Defect Legislative Developments

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorne
    BIM Meets Reality on the Construction Site

    Walking the Tightrope of SB 35

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    U.S. Department of Defense Institutes New Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

    Benford’s Law: A Seldom Used Weapon in Forensic Accounting

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    Construction Employment Rose in 38 States from 2013 to 2014

    Additional Insured Not Covered Where Injury Does Not Arise Out Of Insured's Work

    Empire State Building Owners Sue Photographer for Topless Photo Shoot

    Gary Bague Elected Chairman of ALFA International’s Board of Directors

    LA Home Destroyed in Palisades Fire Draws More Than 60 Offers

    Builders Association Seeks to Cut Down Grassroots Green Building Program (Guest Post)

    Top Talked-About Tech at the 2023 ABC Joint Tech Summit

    The New Jersey Theme Park Where Kids’ Backhoe Dreams Come True

    "Your Work" Exclusion Bars Coverage for Contractor's Faulty Workmanship

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    Contractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case Dismissed

    Cross-Office Team Secures Summary Judgment Win in Negligence Action with $2M Demand

    When “Substantially Similar” Means “Fundamentally Identical”: Delaware Court Enforces Related Claim Provision to Deny D&O Coverage for Securities Class Action

    The Future Has Arrived: New Technologies in Construction

    Contractor Definition Central to Coverage Dispute

    Utah Digs Deep and Finds “Design Defect” Includes Pre-Construction Geotechnical Reports

    No Coverage for Sink Hole Loss

    Housing Starts Surge 23% in Comeback for Canadian Builders

    NYC Hires Engineer LERA for Parking Garage Collapse Probe

    How Does Weather Impact a Foundation?

    From Singapore to Rio Green Buildings Keep Tropical Tenants Cool

    Pennsylvania Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade

    Your Construction Contract

    HOA Fines Capped at $100: Immediate Impact of California’s AB 130

    DIR Public Works Registration System Down, Public Works Contractors Not to be Penalized

    While Construction Permits Slowly Rise, Construction Starts and Completions in California Are Stagnant

    ACS Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Recognized

    Granting of Lodestar Multiplier in Coverage Case Affirmed

    Construction Spending Drops in March

    Apprentices on Public Works Projects: Sometimes it’s Not What You Do But Who You Do the Work For That Counts

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (2/5/25) – The Effect of Trump’s Policies on the Housing Market, Property Value Loss in the Face of Climate Change, and a Transitional Year for the Apartment Market

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Madeline Arcellana on Securing a FULL DISMISSAL for BWB&O’s Clients!

    Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List

    Washington Court of Appeals Divisions Clash Over Interpretations of the Statute of Repose

    Absence of Property Damage During Policy Period Equates to No Coverage

    #3 CDJ Topic: Underwriters of Interest Subscribing to Policy No. A15274001 v. ProBuilders Specialty Ins. Co., Case No. D066615

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    Get Creative to Solve Your Construction Company's Staffing Challenges

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Court Rules Cook County Misspent $243M in Transportation Funds

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic World

    Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees on Attorney’s Fees