BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Marquette County Michigan tract home expert witness Marquette County Michigan condominium expert witness Marquette County Michigan production housing expert witness Marquette County Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan office building expert witness Marquette County Michigan hospital construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan Medical building expert witness Marquette County Michigan institutional building expert witness Marquette County Michigan condominiums expert witness Marquette County Michigan townhome construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Marquette County Michigan parking structure expert witness Marquette County Michigan industrial building expert witness Marquette County Michigan low-income housing expert witness Marquette County Michigan retail construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Marquette County Michigan custom homes expert witness Marquette County Michigan multi family housing expert witness Marquette County Michigan housing expert witness Marquette County Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Marquette County, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Marquette County Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 2361
    307 S Front St Ste 102
    Marquette, MI 49855
    http://www.upbuildersassociation.com

    Little Traverse Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2362
    455 Bay Street
    Petoskey, MI 49770
    http://www.ltahb.com

    Northeastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2373
    102 South Third
    Alpena, MI 49707
    http://www.nemhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Grand Traverse Area
    Local # 2338
    3040 Sunset Lane
    Traverse City, MI 49684
    http://www.hbagta.com

    Tri-Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 2363
    1210 Rough Ct
    Roscommon, MI 48653
    http://www.tl-hba.org

    Mid-Northern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2369
    PO Box 128
    Oscoda, MI 48750


    Mid-Eastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2365
    3823 W Wheeler Rd
    Standish, MI 48658



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Marquette County Michigan

    Cross-Office Team Secures Summary Judgment Win in Negligence Action with $2M Demand

    The Difference Between Seasonal Adverse Weather and Unusually Severe Weather (and How Contractors Can Protect Against Both)

    Unqualified Threat to Picket a Neutral is Unfair Labor Practice

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    ASCE Statement on Devastating Impacts of Hurricane Helene

    LAX Runway Lawsuit a Year Too Late?

    Things You Didn't Know About Your Homeowners Policy

    Breaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In California

    An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract

    Too Costly to Be Fair: Texas Appellate Court Finds the Arbitration Clause in a Residential Construction Contract Unenforceable

    Randy Okland Honored as 2019 Intermountain Legacy Award Winner

    Sometimes, Being too Cute with Pleading Allegations is Unnecessary

    On to Year Thirteen for Blog

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    Construction Law Breaking News: California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Beacon Residential Community Association

    Richest NJ Neighborhood Fights Plan for Low-Cost Homes on Toxic Dump

    Terminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”

    Safety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest Danger

    Should I Pull the Pin? Contractor and Subcontractor Termination for Cause

    How Tech Is Transforming the Construction Industry in 2019

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Awarded Sacramento Business Journal’s Best of the Bar

    Global Insurer Agrees to Pay COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims

    It’s Getting Harder and Harder to be a Concrete Supplier in California

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/18/25) – Data Center Frenzy, China’s Expanding REIT Market and Tariff-Affected Construction Costs

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Lenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered Conditions

    How Construction Contracts are Made. Hint: It’s a Bit Like Making Sausage

    Bel Air Mansion Construction Draws Community Backlash

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    Buyer Beware: Insurance Agents May Have No Duty to Sell Construction Contractors an Insurance Policy Covering Likely Claims

    Christopher Leise Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"

    Texas Supreme Court to Review Eight-Corners Duty-to-Defend Rule

    A Murder in Honduras Reveals the Dark Side of Clean Energy

    The Right to Repair Act (Civ.C §895 et seq.) Applies and is the Exclusive Remedy for a Homeowner Alleging Construction Defects

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Duty to Defend Group Builders Case

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    What Does It Mean When a House Sells for $50 Million?

    Fee Simple!

    Time to Negotiate Limitation on Remedies and Damages Is on the Front End

    Construction Law Firm Welin, O'Shaughnessy + Scheaf Merging with McDonald Hopkins LLC

    Federal Government Sues Four States Over Climate Superfund Laws and Climate Change Litigation

    Construction and Green Building Roundup

    The Moving Finish Line: Statutes of Limitation and Repose Are Not Always What They Seem

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- An Alternative

    Partners Nicole Whyte and Karen Baytosh are Selected for Inclusion in Best Lawyers 2021 and Nicole Nuzzo is Selected for Inclusion in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

    What You Need to Know About CARB’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel Regulations

    Professional Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Construction Context
    Corporate Profile

    MARQUETTE COUNTY MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction and design related expert designations, the Marquette County, Michigan Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets which include construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Marquette County and the surrounding areas.

    Marquette County Michigan expert witnesses fenestrationMarquette County Michigan construction claims expert witnessMarquette County Michigan soil failure expert witnessMarquette County Michigan civil engineer expert witnessMarquette County Michigan expert witness concrete failureMarquette County Michigan consulting general contractorMarquette County Michigan construction scheduling expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Marquette County, Michigan

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    What Prevents Innovation in Construction from Taking Off

    September 15, 2026 —
    In construction, we have the knowledge, technology, and innovative people to radically improve our performance, yet we’re still stuck in old ways. Why is that? I attended an annual gathering for real estate and construction professionals at Rakennustieto Oy, Finland’s leading building information provider. The day before, a half-day seminar was held at the same venue. During both events, we discussed the need for change in the construction sector. Everyone agreed that we need to radically improve how we produce and share information. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/12/26) – Data Center Momentum Increases, Multifamily Construction Projects Decline, CRE Returns as Top Investor Preference

    September 01, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, office vacancies fall, fair housing advocacy groups sue HUD, foreign buyers reduce purchases of U.S. residential real estate, and more!
    • After a brief slowdown to begin the summer, data center construction planning momentum picked up in July, again shining as the brightest sector in building. (Zachary Phillips, Construction Dive)
    • The number of finished multifamily construction projects declined last year — welcome news for multifamily operators eager to work through the recent supply wave — and a record share of new apartments were high-density. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Fair housing advocacy groups sued the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, claiming the agency’s funding restructuring drastically reduces their ability to receive funds from the Fair Housing Initiatives Program. (Ryan Kushner, Multifamily Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...