BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan tract home expert witness Rudyard Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan hospital construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan parking structure expert witness Rudyard Michigan office building expert witness Rudyard Michigan condominiums expert witness Rudyard Michigan retail construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan low-income housing expert witness Rudyard Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Rudyard Michigan casino resort expert witness Rudyard Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan housing expert witness Rudyard Michigan multi family housing expert witness Rudyard Michigan custom homes expert witness Rudyard Michigan custom home expert witness Rudyard Michigan Medical building expert witness Rudyard Michigan production housing expert witness Rudyard Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Rudyard Michigan institutional building expert witness Rudyard Michigan condominium expert witness Rudyard Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rudyard, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rudyard Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 2361
    307 S Front St Ste 102
    Marquette, MI 49855
    http://www.upbuildersassociation.com

    Little Traverse Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2362
    455 Bay Street
    Petoskey, MI 49770
    http://www.ltahb.com

    Northeastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2373
    102 South Third
    Alpena, MI 49707
    http://www.nemhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Grand Traverse Area
    Local # 2338
    3040 Sunset Lane
    Traverse City, MI 49684
    http://www.hbagta.com

    Tri-Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 2363
    1210 Rough Ct
    Roscommon, MI 48653
    http://www.tl-hba.org

    Mid-Northern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2369
    PO Box 128
    Oscoda, MI 48750


    Mid-Eastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2365
    3823 W Wheeler Rd
    Standish, MI 48658



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rudyard Michigan

    The Dominguez Case and Deed Fraud: Who Criminals Target and How to Protect Yourself Against Fraud

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Maritime Charters and the Specter of a New Permitting Regime

    Hurricane Harvey Victims Face New Hurdles In Pursuing Coverage

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Ruling On Certificates Of Merit And “Gist Of Action” May Make It More Difficult For An Architect Or Engineer To Seek An Early Dismissal

    Contractors: A Lesson on Being Friendly

    Quick Note: COVID-19 Claim – Proving Causation

    2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    Construction of $3B Data Center in North Dakota Spurs Annexation Battle

    Want to Make Your Jobsite Safer? Look to the Skies.

    Paycheck Protection Flexibility Act Of 2020: What You Need to Know

    Flood Policy Does Not Cover Debris Removal from Property

    Why the Renovation of Federal Reserve Headquarters Costs $2.5 Billion

    California’s Fifth Appellate District Declares the “Right to Repair Act” the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    When an Intentional Act Results in Injury or Damage, it is not an Accident within the Meaning of an Insurance Policy Even When the Insured did not Intend to Cause the Injury or Damage

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2025 Edition of Chambers USA

    Roots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a Decade

    Policyholders' Coverage Checklist in Times of Coronavirus

    Where Parched California Is Finding New Water Sources

    Illinois Court Determines Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    No Cross-Complaint Needed: Contractor Can Fight Co-Defendant’s Summary Judgment

    Fifth Circuit Holds Insurer Owes Duty to Defend Latent Condition Claim That Caused Fire Damage to Property Years After Construction Work

    Partner Jonathan R. Harwood Obtained Summary Judgment in a Case Involving a Wedding Guest Injured in a Fall

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Twenty White and Williams Lawyers

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2026

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract is Only as Good as Those Signing It

    Administration Launches 'Buy Clean' Construction Materials Push

    Business Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found Ambiguous

    Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company

    Bill to Include Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Introduced in New Jersey

    Contractors Struggle with Cash & Difficult Payment Terms, Could Benefit From Legal Advice, According to New Survey

    A Matter Judged: Subrogating Insurers Should Beware of Prior Suits Involving the Insured

    Righting Past Wrongs Through Equitable Development

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    Will Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?

    Third Circuit Limits Pennsylvania’s Kvaerner Decision; Unexpected and Unintended Injury May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under Pennsylvania Law

    New York Nonprofit Starts Anti-Scaffold Law Video Series

    Miller Act Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyers Rising Stars!

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    How Technology Reduces the Risk of Façade Defects

    The United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Finds Wrap-Up Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage of Additional Insureds

    Depreciating Labor Costs May be Factor in Actual Cash Value

    California Plant Would Convert Wood Waste Into Hydrogen Fuel

    Statutory Time Limits for Construction Defects in Massachusetts

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    Feds Outline Workforce Rules for $39B in Chip Plant Funding
    Corporate Profile

    RUDYARD MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Rudyard, Michigan Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with in house assets which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Rudyard and the surrounding areas.

    Rudyard Michigan stucco expert witnessRudyard Michigan civil engineer expert witnessRudyard Michigan construction claims expert witnessRudyard Michigan construction expertsRudyard Michigan fenestration expert witnessRudyard Michigan expert witness roofingRudyard Michigan roofing and waterproofing expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Rudyard, Michigan

    Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List

    June 22, 2026 —
    Charlotte/North Charleston Partner Brandy G. Price and New York Partner Dean Pillarella have been selected to "The 2026 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation," which recognizes emerging leaders in law. Lawdragon's annual Next Generation listing highlights up-and-coming attorneys with fewer than 15 years in practice. The legal media company selected these honorees through a combination of peer nominations, extensive journalistic research by Lawdragon editors, and independent vetting. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    May 26, 2026 —
    I attended the Datacenter Forum 2026 in Helsinki last week. Over 400 people packed the room. Walking out, I had one overriding thought: Is construction operating in a different century from the technology it is being asked to house? Is Our Industry on Par? Ciarán Forde, Senior Vice President at CTS Nordics, opened the forum with a statement that set the tone for everything that followed: data centers are no longer just a technical challenge; they are a national strategy. Before AI, Ciarán had worked in telecoms, where data centers were already complex. But now, he said flatly, everything has changed, and the industry must rethink everything. The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Current AI data center racks run at 40 to 100 kW. In three years, 800 kW per rack is on the roadmap. And the development cycle for a new chip is roughly one year, which means deployments begin aging out almost as soon as they are commissioned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Identifying Unfair Clauses in Construction Contracts

    February 17, 2026 —
    In 1979, virtually all projects were completed under form contracts. As I started practicing construction law, it seemed that most form contracts were generally fair. They were negotiated by industry groups and over the next 10-20 years they appeared to become fairer. We could and did compare provisions in the AIA documents, the Federal contract forms, and the EJCDC agreements. When we did, we found subtle differences, but broad similarities in their approach to contract risk allocation. Today many (most?) private projects are done with “manuscript” contracts – instruments tailored to the owner’s interests. And many public entities have developed their own contracts. And not all those clauses seem so fair. This month I focus on contract clauses that I consider unfair. And while unfairness, like beauty, may be in the eye of the beholder, I think that the clauses described below aptly fit that descriptor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Curtis W. Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    January 26, 2026 —
    On its face, the power of a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract is profound. It bars otherwise actionable – and sometimes egregious – losses resulting from contractor carelessness before they can ever get started. One question courts have long battled with is the limits to the lasting effects of such a waiver. Whether the waiver power can be transferred amongst parties, applied to third parties or used with policies taken out after construction completion are among the few grey areas that have kept subrogation practitioners and the courts busy. Recently, a federal court in Idaho clarified its position on the power to waive subrogation. In Seneca Ins. Co. v. McAlvain Constr., Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00340-BLW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251777 (D. Idaho), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) addressed whether a subrogation waiver in an AIA construction contract, signed between an owner and the general contractor, applied to the subsequent owner of a building. In doing so, the court looked at the limiting language of the waiver as well as the contractual posture of the subsequent owner. Ultimately, the court found the waiver inapplicable, denying the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff McAlvain Construction, Inc. (McAlvain). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lian Skaf, White and Williams
    Mr. Skaf may be contacted at skafl@whiteandwilliams.com

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    February 23, 2026 —
    Sheppard successfully defended client Mitchelville Real Estate Group and its non-profit development partner Bernal Heights Housing Corporation in an appeal of a 70-unit, 100% affordable senior housing development at 3333 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Bernal Heights neighborhood. The team secured approval of the project, representing the developer on complex land use issues including split zoning, SB 35, the State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Crisis Act, tribal cultural resources and the Subdivision Map Act. Although the ministerially approved parcel map for the project utilized SB 35, it was appealed to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and unanimously rejected. Sheppard’s real estate transactional team also assisted with the acquisition of the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard