BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Smyrna Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan office building expert witness Smyrna Michigan townhome construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Smyrna Michigan low-income housing expert witness Smyrna Michigan hospital construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan condominium expert witness Smyrna Michigan Medical building expert witness Smyrna Michigan industrial building expert witness Smyrna Michigan custom home expert witness Smyrna Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Smyrna Michigan tract home expert witness Smyrna Michigan parking structure expert witness Smyrna Michigan production housing expert witness Smyrna Michigan custom homes expert witness Smyrna Michigan retail construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan casino resort expert witness Smyrna Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan housing expert witness Smyrna Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Smyrna Michigan multi family housing expert witness Smyrna Michigan
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Smyrna, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Smyrna Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Shoreline Builders Association
    Local # 2368
    845 Oakridge Rd
    Muskegon, MI 49441
    http://www.shorelinebuildersassociation.com

    Home Builders Association of Shiawassee County
    Local # 2380
    221 E Exchange St
    Owosso, MI 48867
    http://www.hbashiawassee.com

    Home Builders Association of Metro Flint Inc
    Local # 2332
    4262 Somers Dr
    Burton, MI 48529
    http://www.bamfhome.com

    Home & Builders Association of Gtr Grd Rapids
    Local # 2336
    3196 Kraft Ave SE Ste 300
    Grand Rapids, MI 49512
    http://www.hbaggr.com

    Home Builders Association of the Thumb
    Local # 2385
    PO Box 65
    Sandusky, MI 48471


    Home Builders Association of the Holland Area
    Local # 2340
    211 Lincoln Ave
    Holland, MI 49423
    http://www.hbaholland.com

    Home Builders Association of Saginaw
    Local # 2378
    3165 Cabaret Trl S
    Saginaw, MI 48603
    http://www.hbas.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Smyrna Michigan

    Court Holds That Property Insurance Does Not Cover Economic Loss From Purchasing Counterfeit Vintage Wine

    Water Intrusion Judged Not Related to Construction

    Disaster-Relief Bill Stalls in Senate

    Domtar Update

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Attorney Fee Award Under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act

    Transportation Officials Make the Best of a Bumpy 2020

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Home Builders Wear Many Hats

    Florida trigger

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Is Construction Defect Notice under Florida Repair Statute a Suit?

    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule

    Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Cross-Office Team Secures Defense Verdict in Favor of Client in Asbestos Case

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    Dispute between City and Construction Company Over Unsightly Arches

    Home Building Up in Kansas City

    General Liability Alert: ADA Requirements Pertaining to Wall Space Adjacent to Interior Doors Clarified

    Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Rise to Eight-Month High

    Traub Lieberman Partner Katie Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Obtain Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Failure to Comply with Policy Conditions

    In Real Life the Bad Guy Sometimes Gets Away: Adding Judgment Debtors to a Judgment

    Mechanic’s Liens- Big Exception

    New Jersey Rules that Forensic Lab Analysts Can’t be Forced to Testify

    Assignment of Claim not Precluded by Policy’s Anti-Assignment Clause

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes

    In New Orleans, Katrina Taught a Lesson in Local Resilience

    Independent Contractor v. Employee. The “ABC Test” Does Not Include a Threshold Hiring Entity Test

    Ambiguity Kills in Construction Contracting

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Is Your Business Insured for the Coronavirus?

    11th Circuit Affirms Bad Faith Judgement Against Primary Insurer

    Steven Cvitanovic Recognized in JD Supra's 2017 Readers' Choice Awards

    Inability to Confirm Coverage Supports Setting Aside Insured’s Default Judgment on Grounds of Extrinsic Mistake

    Boston-area Asbestos-Abatement Firms Face Wage and Safety Complaints

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2019 40 & Under Hot List

    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    Work without Permits may lead to Problems Later

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .

    SCOTUS, Having Received Views of Solicitor General, Will Decide Whether CWA Regulates Indirect Discharge of Pollutants Into Navigable Water Via Groundwater

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits

    Kaboom! Illinois Applies the Anti-Subrogation Rule to Require a Landlord’s Subrogating Property Insurer to Defend a Third-Party Complaint Against Tenants

    Housing Starts Fall as U.S. Single-Family Projects Decline

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    Scott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Housing in U.S. Cools as Rate Rise Hits Sales: Mortgages

    Contract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)

    How BIM Can Serve Building Owners
    Corporate Profile

    SMYRNA MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Smyrna, Michigan Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Smyrna and the surrounding areas.

    Smyrna Michigan consulting engineersSmyrna Michigan slope failure expert witnessSmyrna Michigan structural concrete expertSmyrna Michigan building code compliance expert witnessSmyrna Michigan expert witness windowsSmyrna Michigan construction cost estimating expert witnessSmyrna Michigan construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Smyrna, Michigan

    A Green Light for Housing? What Executive Order 14394 Means for Your Next Project

    May 26, 2026 —
    On March 13, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14394, “Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction” (the “Order”). The Order directs federal agencies to reduce regulatory burdens on residential development, streamline environmental permitting, and encourage state and local governments to adopt housing-friendly policies. The Order includes several key provisions that developers and homebuilders should be aware of moving forward. Key Provisions The Order targets four main areas: 1. Federal Environmental Regulations First, it directs the Secretary of the Army and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise permitting standards, including stormwater permits, wetlands permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and related construction-site requirements. The Order also targets energy-efficiency mandates for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) financed housing. For developers and homebuilders, these revisions could reduce project delays and compliance costs associated with stormwater management, wetlands mitigation, and energy-efficiency upgrades, expenses that often add significant time and cost to residential development projects. Reprinted courtesy of Bennett Houck, Snell & Wilmer, Miranda Martinez, Snell & Wilmer and Byron Sarhangian, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Houck may be contacted at bhouck@swlaw.com Ms. Martinez may be contacted at mimartinez@swlaw.com Mr. Sarhangian may be contacted at bsarhangian@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

    October 06, 2026 —
    Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    June 08, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) addition of sodium perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS-Na) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) introduces new federal reporting requirements for businesses that manufacture, process, or use the chemical. Because reporting obligations apply retroactively to the start of the year, affected facilities must quickly evaluate their compliance and recordkeeping practices. In a recent Law360 article, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, explains why PFHxS-Na was automatically added to the TRI, how the EPA’s public reporting system works, and which businesses may be affected by the new rule. The article also touches upon key compliance considerations, including supply chain reviews, reporting thresholds for chemicals of special concern, and preparation for public disclosure requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    May 26, 2026 —
    I attended the Datacenter Forum 2026 in Helsinki last week. Over 400 people packed the room. Walking out, I had one overriding thought: Is construction operating in a different century from the technology it is being asked to house? Is Our Industry on Par? Ciarán Forde, Senior Vice President at CTS Nordics, opened the forum with a statement that set the tone for everything that followed: data centers are no longer just a technical challenge; they are a national strategy. Before AI, Ciarán had worked in telecoms, where data centers were already complex. But now, he said flatly, everything has changed, and the industry must rethink everything. The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Current AI data center racks run at 40 to 100 kW. In three years, 800 kW per rack is on the roadmap. And the development cycle for a new chip is roughly one year, which means deployments begin aging out almost as soon as they are commissioned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com