We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs
August 24, 2026 —
Aarni Heiskanen - AEC BusinessLast Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency.
Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Aarni Heiskanen, AEC BusinessMr. Heiskanen may be contacted at
aec-business@aepartners.fi
Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!
May 14, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPHuge Congratulations to Partner
Kevin Wheeler and Associate
Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages.
The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals
June 08, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordA $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements
June 29, 2026 —
Jill Casson Owen, Benjamin J. Hawkins & Stephen Wright - Snell & WilmerA Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026)
OVERVIEW
The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law).
KEY HOLDINGS
1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings
The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer,
Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and
Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer
Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com
Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com
Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
Supply Chain Is a Legal Exposure—Not Just a Force Majeure Problem
September 08, 2026 —
Owen Newman - Construction ExecutiveThis is not another force majeure article. The supply-chain related legal exposure that contractors are carrying today—in sanctions risk, specification non-compliance, warranty exposure and regulatory volatility—extends well beyond what even a well-drafted force majeure clause protects.
An engineering, procurement and construction contractor on a gas-fired power plant discovers during commissioning that transformer oil in a critical unit contains Russian-origin naphthenic base oil, which is a prohibited source under Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions. The contractor didn’t source it. A subsupplier two tiers below made the substitution when disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz tightened the primary supply chain for this specialty product and no one in the purchase-order chain flagged it. The procurement decision is long done and the documentation trail that should have caught it doesn’t exist.
Reprinted courtesy of
Owen Newman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...Mr. Newman may be contacted at
oknewman@duanemorris.com
Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke Win Final Summary Judgment on Behalf of Homeowner’s Insurance Company
November 02, 2026 —
Ryan S. Parker, Robert Biferie & Matthew Groteke - Traub LiebermanTraub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke won final summary judgment on behalf of their client, a homeowner’s insurance company. The case related to a claim for damage caused by Hurricane Milton, which was reported more than ten months after the date of loss. The homeowner’s insurance company reviewed historical aerial photography of the roof and determined that there was no evidence of damage immediately after the Hurricane, which was inconsistent with the condition of the roof when it was inspected more than ten months later. Additionally, the homeowner’s insurance company was unable to determine when the interior water damage occurred due to the delay in reporting the claim. After a lawsuit was filed, the Traub Lieberman team took depositions of the Plaintiffs and the opposing expert and eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the failure to timely report the claim and resulting prejudice to their client. The Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment finding that notice of the claim was untimely as a matter of law and that the Plaintiffs failed to rebut the legal presumption of prejudice to the insurance company. As a result of the ruling, the insurance company has a valid claim for attorney’s fees.
Reprinted courtesy of
Ryan S. Parker, Traub Lieberman,
Robert Biferie, Traub Lieberman and
Matthew Groteke, Traub Lieberman
Mr. Parker may be contacted at rparker@tlsslaw.com
Mr. Biferie may be contacted at rbiferie@tlsslaw.com
Mr. Groteke may be contacted at mgroteke@tlsslaw.com
Read the full story...
$10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight
September 15, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordA $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027
August 03, 2026 —
Denis Serkin & Michael S. Zicherman - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.P&A partners
Denis Serkin and
Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide.
Reprinted courtesy of
Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of UsColorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo DevelopersContractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization ProgramBHA has a Nice Swing Benefits the Wounded Warrior ProjectNinth Circuit Resolves Federal-State Court Split Regarding Whether 'Latent' Defects Discovered After Duration of Warranty Period are Actionable under California's Lemon Law StatuteEPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real PropertyAmerica’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure InvestmentNo Indemnity Coverage Where Insured Suffers No LossNew York Restaurant and Bar Fire Caused by Electric DefectPinterest Nixes Big San Francisco Lease Deal in Covid ScalebackCounter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in ConstructionContractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for HurricanesTo Bee or Not to Bee - CA Court Finds Denial of Coverage Based on Exclusion was Premature Where Facts had not been Judicially DeterminedU.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy CourtsDefend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret LawGeneral Contractors: Consider Importance of "Primary Noncontributory" LanguageDoes Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably IntertwinedWitt Named to 2017 Super LawyersDon’t Assert as a Counterclaim to a Lien Foreclosure Lawsuit an Order to Show Cause ClaimThe Godfather of Solar Predicts Its FutureTexas Federal District Court Dismisses COVID-19 ClaimSmoke and Soot Constitute Direct Physical LossRoadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction ZoneBad Faith in the First Party Insurance ContextOSHA Updates: You May Be AffectedCalifornia MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11thDefenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial2017 California Construction Law UpdateLLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They ShineKentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies AppealWinning Construction Disputes: Strategic Negotiation for Better OutcomesKamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries ListHousing Agency Claims It Is Not a Party in Construction Defect CaseInsurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 ProceedingWall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV ShowGovernor Signs AB5 Into Law — Reshaping California's Independent Contractor Classification LandscapeEx-Corps Worker Pleads Guilty to Bribery on Afghan ContractTexas Granted Primacy Over Class VI Carbon Storage WellsEminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway ProjectHaight’s Sacramento Office Has MovedResidential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.You Filed a Mechanic’s Lien. Then You Discovered a Mistake. Now What?Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance2017 Susan G. Komen Race for the CureBaltimore Project Pushes To Meet Federal DeadlineDamp Weather Not Good for WoodUrban Retrofits, Tall Buildings, and SustainabilityForensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam FailureWisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes1880">
Insurer’s Discovery Requests Ruled to be Overbroad in Construction Defect SuitSouth Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco DefectsWhat I Learned at My First NAWIC National Conference2016 California Construction Law UpateAllegations Confirm Duty to Defend Construction Defect ClaimsPandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer PaymentsWould You Trade a Parking Spot for an Extra Bedroom?Grupo Mexico Spill Sparks Public Scrutiny of $150 Million Mop-UpDesign-Assist, an Ambiguous Term Causing Conflict in the Construction Industry[1]Rebuilding After the 2025 Southern California Fires