BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota concrete tilt-up expert witness Goodland Minnesota condominium expert witness Goodland Minnesota institutional building expert witness Goodland Minnesota office building expert witness Goodland Minnesota structural steel construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota custom home expert witness Goodland Minnesota multi family housing expert witness Goodland Minnesota parking structure expert witness Goodland Minnesota production housing expert witness Goodland Minnesota casino resort expert witness Goodland Minnesota Medical building expert witness Goodland Minnesota landscaping construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota housing expert witness Goodland Minnesota townhome construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota tract home expert witness Goodland Minnesota custom homes expert witness Goodland Minnesota Subterranean parking expert witness Goodland Minnesota condominiums expert witness Goodland Minnesota high-rise construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota industrial building expert witness Goodland Minnesota mid-rise construction expert witness Goodland Minnesota
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Goodland, Minnesota

    Minnesota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Statutory warranties for one-year, two-year and ten-year periods limits types of construction defects actionable under warranty law; This statute (Chapter 327A) limits liability and excludes normal wear and tear, normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling, loss due to insufficient ventilation, loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance, or alteration to dwelling, loss or damage from failure to maintain or failure to mitigate


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Goodland Minnesota

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. If you work in two or more trades, certain trades will require a license. Call the state for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern MN Builders Association
    Local # 2417
    802 S Pokegama Ave Ste A
    Grand Rapids, MN 55744
    http://www.nmbuilders.com

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 2480
    PO Box 402
    Bemidji, MN 56619
    http://www.headwatersbuilders.org

    Lake Region Builders Association
    Local # 2470
    1114 Hwy. 59 South Ste 2
    Detroit Lakes, MN 56501
    http://www.lakeregionbuilders.com

    Arrowhead Builders Association
    Local # 2415
    5255 Maple Grove Road
    HERMANTOWN, MN 55811
    http://www.abamn.org

    Home Builders Association of Mid-Minnesota
    Local # 2450
    17068 Commercial Park Road
    Brainerd, MN 56401
    http://www.midmnba.org

    Vikingland Builders Assoc
    Local # 2495
    509 22ND AVE E Ste 200
    Alexandria, MN 56308
    http://www.vikinglandbuilders.com

    Central Minnesota Builders Association
    Local # 2410
    1124 W Saint Germain St
    Saint Cloud, MN 56301
    http://www.cmbaonline.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Goodland Minnesota

    COVID-izing Your Construction Contract

    Newark Trial Team Obtains Affirmance of Summary Judgment for General Contractor Client

    Bad Faith in the First Party Insurance Context

    "Repair Work" Endorsements and Punch List Work

    Alexander Moore Promoted to Managing Partner of Kahana Feld’s Oakland Office

    Lewis Brisbois Promotes 35 to Partnership

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/28/25) – FTC Suing Greystar, DOJ Investigating Top Residential Landlords and Trump Facing Housing Conundrum

    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: RACHEL CLANCY

    A Court-Side Seat: A Poultry Defense, a Houston Highway and a CERCLA Consent Decree that Won’t Budge

    New York Developer’s Alleged Court Judgment Woes

    Traub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Secure Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Motion for Remand

    Surge in Home Completions Tamps Down Inflation as Fed Meets

    Water Damage Sub-Limit Includes Tear-Out Costs

    Las Vegas Partner Sarah Odia Named a 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyer Rising Star

    Las Vegas’ McCarran Tower Construction Issues Delays Opening

    Georgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter

    #6 CDJ Topic: Construction Defect Legislative Developments

    N.J. Appellate Court Applies Continuous Trigger Theory in Property Damage Case and Determines “Last Pull” for Coverage

    NTSB Cites Design Errors in Fatal Bridge Collapse

    2018 Super Bowl US. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis

    Avoiding Project Planning Disasters: How to Spot Problem Projects

    Auburn Woods Homeowners Association v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    Montana Federal Court Upholds Application of Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    Cybersecurity on Your Project: Why Not Follow National Security Strategy?

    In Contracts, One Word Makes All the Difference

    Chris Konzelmann Appointed to NASP Board of Directors

    When a Neighborhood Floods, Foreclosures Often Follow

    North Carolina Soil & Groundwater Case to be Heard by U.S. Supreme Court

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Contractor Sues Golden Gate Bridge District Over Suicide Net Project

    There's No Such Thing as a Free House

    Subcontractor Strength Will Drive Industry’s Ability to Meet Demand, Overcome Challenges

    Maui Wildfire Cleanup Advances to Debris Removal Phase

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Business Interruption Claim Denied

    Chinese Hunt for Trophy Properties Boosts NYC, London Prices

    Unpaid Subcontractor Walks Off the Job and Wins

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Decrease on Fewer Investors

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    No Indemnity Coverage Where Insured Suffers No Loss

    Florida’s “Groundbreaking” Property Insurance Reform Law

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335
    Corporate Profile

    GOODLAND MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Goodland, Minnesota Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Goodland and the surrounding areas.

    Goodland Minnesota building expertGoodland Minnesota expert witness concrete failureGoodland Minnesota building consultant expertGoodland Minnesota construction claims expert witnessGoodland Minnesota construction cost estimating expert witnessGoodland Minnesota construction expert witness public projectsGoodland Minnesota eifs expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Goodland, Minnesota

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Mark Cronenwett Obtains Appellate Ruling Vacating Default Judgment Against Mortgage Lender Client

    October 12, 2026 —
    Dallas Partner Mark Cronenwett recently secured a decision from the Dallas Court of Appeals that vacated a default judgment against his mortgage lender client, on the grounds that the client was never properly served with the complaint. In prior litigation, a real property investor purchased a Texas residential property for pennies on the dollar at an HOA foreclosure sale. That investor then filed a frivolous lawsuit against Lewis Brisbois' mortgage-lender client to invalidate its lien, contending that mortgage lender had abandoned the debt because it failed to respond to the investor’s alleged requests for information about the amounts owed on the loan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Safeguarding Your Privileged Construction Information With a Clawback Agreement

    June 08, 2026 —
    For contractors and construction executives, a dispute that escalates to litigation brings risks that go well beyond the jobsite. When a dispute escalates to litigation, the attorney-client privilege is a critical protection to safeguard your interests. Disclosing privileged material can undermine your litigation position and, in some cases, negatively impact your business. In the construction context, this often includes sensitive communications about project delays, defect investigations, safety incidents or payment disputes—materials that can significantly impact both liability and reputation. During litigation, the discovery process requires the exchange of documents and data with your adversary. If privileged materials are disclosed to your adversary during discovery you risk the waiver of your privilege, which in plain terms means you lose the protection of the privilege and make the privileged information, and in some cases all other information related to the same subject matter, available to your adversary. It is critical that your attorney take steps to protect against the unintentional disclosure of privileged materials during discovery to avoid a waiver. Reprinted courtesy of Laura Fraher, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Ms. Fraher may be contacted at lfraher@barclaydamon.com

    One Building, Six Owners, One Defective Stucco System: How Do You Coordinate Repairs?

    November 02, 2026 —
    The Problem: Six Homes, One Building Envelope Consider a hypothetical six-unit townhome building in Colorado. Each residence is individually owned. There is no homeowners association responsible for maintaining the building’s exterior, no commonly owned building envelope, and no association empowered to pursue construction defect claims on behalf of all six homeowners. Instead, the development relies on individual ownership, recorded easements, and party wall agreements to govern relationships among neighboring owners. Although the residences are separately owned, they share a continuous exterior stucco system, including interconnected flashing, waterproofing, and architectural transitions. One homeowner discovers water intrusion and retains an expert who identifies defects in the stucco installation. The expert recommends removing and replacing the stucco on the homeowner’s residence. However, because the exterior cladding and waterproofing systems are interconnected, the proposed repair may require work extending beyond the boundaries of that homeowner’s property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    July 06, 2026 —
    Our firm is proud to announce a decisive defense victory obtained by Partner Daniel Crespo and Associate Lauren Landau for our client in a high-exposure premises liability action arising from a 2022 incident at an active school construction site in Perris, California. On March 10, 2026, the Riverside County Superior Court granted Summary Judgment in full for our client, dismissing all claims brought by Plaintiff, who alleged she tripped and fell over a curb while picking up her daughter from school and sustained ankle and wrist injuries as a result. Through meticulous preparation and the strategic use of construction plans, contractual documents, and onsite surveillance video evidence, our team demonstrated that our client had no ownership, possession, or control over the portion of the existing sidewalk where the incident occurred, with construction plans unambiguously designating the area as pre-existing concrete outside our client’s scope of work, and the Construction Services Agreement expressly reserving control over all existing site improvements to the school district. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com