BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota production housing expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota industrial building expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota institutional building expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota retail construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota low-income housing expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota condominiums expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota hospital construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota custom homes expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota tract home expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota mid-rise construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota multi family housing expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota housing expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota condominium expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota Medical building expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota townhome construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota landscaping construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota office building expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota parking structure expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota casino resort expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota structural steel construction expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota Subterranean parking expert witness Long Prairie Minnesota
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Long Prairie, Minnesota

    Minnesota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Statutory warranties for one-year, two-year and ten-year periods limits types of construction defects actionable under warranty law; This statute (Chapter 327A) limits liability and excludes normal wear and tear, normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling, loss due to insufficient ventilation, loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance, or alteration to dwelling, loss or damage from failure to maintain or failure to mitigate


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Long Prairie Minnesota

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. If you work in two or more trades, certain trades will require a license. Call the state for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Vikingland Builders Assoc
    Local # 2495
    509 22ND AVE E Ste 200
    Alexandria, MN 56308
    http://www.vikinglandbuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Mid-Minnesota
    Local # 2450
    17068 Commercial Park Road
    Brainerd, MN 56401
    http://www.midmnba.org

    Central Minnesota Builders Association
    Local # 2410
    1124 W Saint Germain St
    Saint Cloud, MN 56301
    http://www.cmbaonline.org

    West Central Builders Assoc
    Local # 2432
    PO Box 447
    New London, MN 56273
    http://www.westcentralbuilders.com

    Arrowhead Builders Association
    Local # 2415
    5255 Maple Grove Road
    HERMANTOWN, MN 55811
    http://www.abamn.org

    Lake Region Builders Association
    Local # 2470
    1114 Hwy. 59 South Ste 2
    Detroit Lakes, MN 56501
    http://www.lakeregionbuilders.com

    Builders Association of the Twin Cities
    Local # 2433
    2960 Centre Pointe Drive
    Roseville, MN 55113
    http://www.batconline.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Long Prairie Minnesota

    Contractor’s Charge Of Improvements To Real Property Not Required For Laborers To Have Lien Rights

    Surprising Dismissal of False Claims Act Case Based on Appointments Clause - What Does It Mean?

    How to Fix America

    The Comcast Project is Not Likely to Be Shut Down Too Long

    Los Angeles Delays ‘Mansion Tax’ Spending Amid Legal Fight

    California Is Running Out of Safe Places to Build Homes Due to Fires, Rising Seas

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Want More Transit (and Federal Funding)? Build Housing That Supports It

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    Maryland Contractor Documents its Illegal Deal and Pays $2.15 Million to Settle Fraud Claims

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .

    Congress to be Discussing Housing

    Just Because I May Be An “Expert” Does Not Mean I Am Giving Expert Testimony

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    Rhode Island District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Case for Spoliation Due to Potential Unfair Prejudice to Defendant

    Crowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade Center

    Type I Differing Site Conditions Claim is Not Easy to Prove

    Insurer Cannot Abandon Defense Agreement on Underlying Asbestos Claims Against Insured

    Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

    Hunton Insurance Practice Receives Top (Tier 1) National Ranking by US News & World Report

    Insured’s Motion to Compel Production of Underwriting Materials Granted

    Encinitas Office Obtains Complete Defense Verdict Including Attorney Fees and Costs After Ten Day Construction Arbitration

    Is Your Business Insured for the Coronavirus?

    Quick Note: Third-Party Can Bring Common Law Bad Faith Claim

    Coverage, Bad Faith Upheld In Construction Defect Case

    Home insurance perks for green-friendly design (guest post)

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    On the Ten Year Anniversary of the JOBS Act A Look-Back at the Development of Crowdfunding

    What You Need to Know to Protect the Project Against Defect Claims

    Court Rules on a Long List of Motions in Illinois National Insurance Co v Nordic PCL

    How the California and Maui Wildfires Will Affect Future Construction Projects

    Could This Gel Help Tame the California Fires?

    Risky Business: Contractual Versus Equitable Rights of Subrogation

    4 Ways the PRO Act Would Impact the Construction Industry

    Ninth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Construction Defects Under California Law

    New York Court of Appeals Addresses Choice of Law Challenges

    Strangers in a Strange Land: Revisiting Arbitration Provisions to Account for Increasing International Influences

    Forecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in California

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    U.S. Homeownership Rate Rises for First Time in Two Years

    A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect

    Standard of Care

    The COVID-19 Impact: Navigating the Legal Landscape’s New Normal

    Spain Risks €10.6 Billion Flood Damage Bill, Sanchez Says

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”

    The Importance of Retrofitting Existing Construction to Meet Sustainability Standards

    Manhattan to Add Most Office Space Since ’90 Over 3 Years

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 29 White and Williams Lawyers
    Corporate Profile

    LONG PRAIRIE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Long Prairie, Minnesota Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which include construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Long Prairie and the surrounding areas.

    Long Prairie Minnesota expert witness concrete failureLong Prairie Minnesota delay claim expert witnessLong Prairie Minnesota consulting architect expert witnessLong Prairie Minnesota building consultant expertLong Prairie Minnesota construction expert witness public projectsLong Prairie Minnesota engineering expert witnessLong Prairie Minnesota construction scheduling expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Long Prairie, Minnesota

    UPDATED: Dominion Sues Feds Over Offshore Wind Project Halt, With Action Possible on Others Shut

    February 02, 2026 —
    UPDATED: Dominion Energy filed a federal lawsuit Dec. 23 in Norfolk, Va. against the U.S. Interior Dept. immediate construction pause order for its 2.6-GW Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind energy project (CVOW) off Virginia Beach, Va., which it developing to begin operation next year. The project is one of five large East Coast offshore wind projects under construction that the federal agency paused, claiming new "national security" risks. Dominion and OSW Project LLC, the entity that includes project co-owner Stonepeak Partners, a private investor, said they seek a temporary restraining order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Modern Building-Sundt $17M Claim Is Stranded by Hospital Bankruptcy

    April 27, 2026 —
    A $16.9-million claim for work on a hospital addition by a joint venture of contractors Modern Building Co. and Sundt Construction is stuck and delayed indefinitely following the California hospital's December bankruptcy filing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Why and When Construction Robotics Makes Sense

    February 10, 2026 —
    In construction, robotics is often discussed in terms of technology: better AI, more capable machines, and robots on job sites. Recent research suggests that the question is less about whether robots can work and more about when and why they deliver real value. An Aalto University research paper on computer-vision-driven robotic waste sorting offers a valuable lens into this. The researchers use ZenRobotics’ computer-vision-enabled automated system as a case study. The Finnish startup was acquired by Terex, a U.S. company, in 2022. At first glance, waste sorting might seem like a niche application. But it illustrates a broader economic logic that aligns with findings across the broader body of research on construction robotics. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    March 31, 2026 —
    Earlier this month, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard argument in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co. et al., a dispute concerning the state’s Prompt Payment Act (PPA). Although a decision has yet to be issued, it could potentially pose widespread implications for high-value private construction projects moving forward – and perhaps backwards. The PPA, G. L. c. 149, § 29E, enacted by the Massachusetts Legislature in 2010, has become a keystone in the construction industry. It was enacted to address, in part, downstream cash flow issues that tend to pervade construction projects by mandating a series of strict guidelines for submitting, and responding to, payment applications for private projects valued over $3,000,000. Amongst these requirements are set timeframes to respond to an application, as well as what must be contained in an application rejection. Critically, if an owner or upper-tier contractor fails to fully comply with all the statutory requirements in response to a proper payment application, the application is automatically “deemed to be approved” and payable. Significantly, however, this is not always the end of the line. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Catherine Maronski, Robinson Cole
    Ms. Maronski may be contacted at cmaronski@rc.com

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Identifying Unfair Clauses in Construction Contracts

    February 17, 2026 —
    In 1979, virtually all projects were completed under form contracts. As I started practicing construction law, it seemed that most form contracts were generally fair. They were negotiated by industry groups and over the next 10-20 years they appeared to become fairer. We could and did compare provisions in the AIA documents, the Federal contract forms, and the EJCDC agreements. When we did, we found subtle differences, but broad similarities in their approach to contract risk allocation. Today many (most?) private projects are done with “manuscript” contracts – instruments tailored to the owner’s interests. And many public entities have developed their own contracts. And not all those clauses seem so fair. This month I focus on contract clauses that I consider unfair. And while unfairness, like beauty, may be in the eye of the beholder, I think that the clauses described below aptly fit that descriptor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Curtis W. Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com