BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi high-rise construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi concrete tilt-up expert witness Decatur Mississippi landscaping construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi Subterranean parking expert witness Decatur Mississippi production housing expert witness Decatur Mississippi tract home expert witness Decatur Mississippi low-income housing expert witness Decatur Mississippi casino resort expert witness Decatur Mississippi condominiums expert witness Decatur Mississippi condominium expert witness Decatur Mississippi custom home expert witness Decatur Mississippi office building expert witness Decatur Mississippi structural steel construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi multi family housing expert witness Decatur Mississippi housing expert witness Decatur Mississippi mid-rise construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi institutional building expert witness Decatur Mississippi hospital construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi retail construction expert witness Decatur Mississippi parking structure expert witness Decatur Mississippi industrial building expert witness Decatur Mississippi
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Decatur, Mississippi

    Mississippi Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1166/SB1081, HB722/SB2368) The New Home Warranty Act stipulates warranties for one-year and six-year periods limits types of defects; defines specific defects and exclusions such as outbuildings, detached garages, detached carports, swimming pools, recreational facilities, driveways, walkways, patios, boundary walls, retaining walls, bulkheads, fences, landscaping, off-site improvements, drainage, utilities, etc.; additional exclusions are negligence, improper maintenance, or improper operation, failure to comply with warranty requirements of manufacturer, inadequate ventilation, lack of mitigation, normal wear and tear, insect damage or "rotting of any kind", mold or mold damage, consequential damages, and defects in electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or similar fixture not manufactured by builder


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Decatur Mississippi

    State license required for commercial jobs over $100,000, city or county jobs over $50,000.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2554
    PO Box 1860
    Ridgeland, MS 39158
    http://www.hbajackson.com

    Meridian-Miss Home Builders Association
    Local # 2536
    8589 A C Brown Road
    Meridian, MS 39305


    Home Builders Association of Vicksburg
    Local # 2581
    PO Box 821035
    Vicksburg, MS 39182


    Home Builders Association of Mississippi
    Local # 2500
    PO Box 3556
    Jackson, MS 39207
    http://www.hbam.com

    Home Builders Association of Mid-Mississippi
    Local # 2568
    PO Box 572
    Carthage, MS 39051


    Home Builders Association of East Central Mississippi
    Local # 2516
    PO Box 1551
    Laurel, MS 39441


    Greenville Chapter
    Local # 2518
    1153 S Main Apt J3
    Greenville, MS 38701



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Decatur Mississippi
    Corporate Profile

    DECATUR MISSISSIPPI CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Decatur, Mississippi Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with in house assets which include licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Decatur construction industry.

    Decatur Mississippi delay claim expert witnessDecatur Mississippi construction cost estimating expert witnessDecatur Mississippi expert witness roofingDecatur Mississippi ada design expert witnessDecatur Mississippi consulting engineersDecatur Mississippi soil failure expert witnessDecatur Mississippi consulting architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Decatur, Mississippi

    Reminder: FOLLOW Your Well Drafted Contract Provisions

    February 17, 2026 —
    I have early and very often stated that your contract is the basis for everything relating to your construction project. Everything from “no damages for delay” clauses to attorney fees to indemnity are found in those documents. A well drafted construction contract sets the expectations for the project clearly and, aside from just making it easier on everyone for a successful project, will ease things should there be any dispute later. However, all of the great drafting and pre-construction negotiation in the world won’t do you a bit of good if you don’t follow those provisions. I can’t count the number of times that a contractor or subcontractor has read and even understood the construction documents but then put the contract in the drawer and didn’t look at it again. Your experienced construction attorney, while helpful at the drafting and negotiation stages and beyond, cannot help do the work. Your lawyer can help you negotiate and highlight the notice provisions of the contract but cannot provide that notice to the Owner or General Contractor when you have a claim. In short, the best contract in the world is only as good as those that are following it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    March 24, 2026 —
    Tampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars. The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    To Settle or Not Settle: Factors to Weigh and Practical Considerations

    January 13, 2026 —
    Deciding to settle a construction dispute is often wrought with difficulty, requiring the decision maker to evaluate a number of factors. Nevertheless, there are no hard and fast rules that apply when advising a party whether or not they should settle a dispute. Yet the vast majority of construction disputes do settle before going to trial or arbitration. In fact, recent statistics show that approximately 95% of all civil cases, including construction disputes, settle before trial[1]. However, whether settlement is always the best choice depends on several factors to be discussed here. Merits of Your Case First and foremost are the merits of your claims and defenses against any claims that are asserted against you. Construction disputes are inherently fact sensitive, and the merits of a case are driven by the facts of the dispute. Simple breach of contract actions for balances of unpaid funds for the work and materials that have been provided and installed on a project make weighing the merits of the affirmative claim relatively simple. However, these types of “collection cases” stand in stark contrast to complex construction delay claims for equitable adjustment where there exist competing and numerous causes of the delays. In addition, there are complicated legal principles applicable to whether there is entitlement to compensation for the delay or simply an extension of time. Construction defect claims where technical engineering issues are involved also present a heightened level of complexity that may make such cases difficult to prove on the merits. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gerard J. Onorata, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Onorata may be contacted at gonorata@pecklaw.com

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    April 14, 2026 —
    I had a case last year in which once again I found myself thinking: if only my client had better documented the verbal agreements, we would have had a much easier time defending his work. I know this is often easier said than done— you are in the middle of building a project, and you get a call, and you need to keep the project moving. No time for written change directives or a special bulletin. And yet—it is simply amazing to me the number of people who develop “litigation amnesia” about things when a lawsuit is involved. Your documentation system does not need to be perfect. You can use a simple Field notebook and handwritten notations. A text memo to yourself or, better yet, an email confirmation to the owner/contractor/whoever. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    ZEC 2.0: New York’s Zero Emissions Credit Program Gets an Extension and a Reboot

    February 10, 2026 —
    In a landmark move that could shape New York’s energy landscape for decades, state officials have taken steps to both preserve its existing nuclear power facilities and significantly expand its advanced nuclear capacity. These actions are part of a broader strategy to maintain grid reliability and meet both escalating energy demand and the state’s ambitious greenhouse gas reduction and zero carbon goals. Renewing the Zero Emissions Credit Program On January 22, 2026, the New York Public Services Commission (PSC) unanimously voted to extend and reboot the Zero Emissions Credit program (now called ZEC 2.0) to ensure that New York’s four upstate nuclear reactors maintain operations through 2049. The program, which began in 2016, is designed to provide revenue subsidies for legacy nuclear facilities that have been facing financial difficulties in New York’s competitive wholesale power markets. State officials have stated that the benefits of ensuring the continued operations of these reactors far outweigh the costs due to the lack of zero-emissions alternatives and the importance of ensuring grid reliability in the face of escalating energy demand from large loads like data centers. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Promptly Notifying Your Insurer of a Claim Matters

    December 30, 2025 —
    Does promptly notifying your insurer of a claim matter? A recent case out of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals answers this question in the affirmative. MAKE SURE TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY YOUR INSURER OF A POTENTIAL CLAIM. In L. Squared Industries, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 31 Fla.L.Weekly C529a (11th Cir. 2025), an insured owned gas stations and had a claims-made storage tank liability insurance policy. The policy provided: “You must see to it that we are notified as soon as reasonably possible, but in any event, not more than seven (7) days after the insured first became aware of, or should have become aware of a pollution condition which may result in a claim or any action or proceeding to impose an obligation on the insured for cleanup costs . . . .” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    February 17, 2026 —
    The construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified. Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong into "The Mediation Day"—a high-stakes, expensive, one-day marathon where we expect dozens of parties, hundreds of insurance layers, and thousands of pages of expert reports to magically align into a settlement by 6:00 PM. As we open our calendars for the new year, it is time for a professional resolution. We must stop treating mediation as a single-day event and start treating it as a managed, sequenced process. The centerpiece of this resolution is the “Tee-Up Day.” ASCE Statement on House Failure to Pass the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Lack of Credibility Can Destroy a Claim

    Unbilled Costs Remain in Tutor Perini's Finances

    Public Policy Prevails: Homebuilders and Homebuyers Cannot Agree to Disclaim Implied Warranty of Habitability in Arizona

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    Delaware River Interstate Bridge Shut to Assess Truss Fracture

    New Jersey’s Proposed Construction Defect Law May Not Cover Everything

    Why Clinton and Trump’s Infrastructure Plans Leave Us Wanting More

    Texas Walks the Line on When the Duty to Preserve Evidence at a Fire Scene Arises

    Minnesota Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade for the Sec
    Miller Act CLAIMS: Finding Protections and Preserving Your Rights

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    Harvey's Aftermath Will Rattle Construction Supply Chain, Economists Say

    Three Attorneys Elevated to Partner at Newmeyer & Dillion, LLP

    Quick Note: Subcontractor Payment Bond = Common Law Payment Bond

    Scott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    California Supreme Court Holds that Design Immunity Does Not Protect a Public Entity for Failure to Warn of Dangerous Conditions

    2016 Hawaii Legislature Enacts Five Insurance-Related Bills

    Endorsement to Insurance Policy Controls

    Crossrail Audit Blames Busted Budget and Schedule on Mismanagement

    Risk Transfer: The Souffle of Construction Litigation

    CISA Guidance 3.1: Not Much Change for Construction

    Stormy Skies Ahead? Important News Regarding a Hard Construction Insurance Market

    Massachusetts High Court Allows Plaintiffs to Bring Contract-Based Construction Defects Claim After Expiration of Statute of Repose

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Housing-Related Spending Made Up Significant Portion of GDP in Fourth Quarter 2013

    Traub Lieberman Partner Rina Clemens Selected as a 2023 Florida Super Lawyers® Rising Star

    Cincinnati Goes Green

    Another TV Fried as Georgia Leads U.S. in Lightning Costs

    Despite Increased Presence in Construction, Women Lack Size-Appropriate PPE

    Connecticut Federal District Court Keeps Busy With Collapse Cases

    Endorsements Do Not Exclude Coverage for Wrongful Death Claim

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: One’s to Watch” 2024 Editions

    Court of Appeals Expands Application of Construction Statute of Repose

    Rights Afforded to Employees and Employers During Strikes

    CDJ’s #3 Topic of the Year: Burch v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (2014)

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Contractor Covered for Voluntary Remediation Efforts in Completed Homes

    COVID-19 Response: Environmental Compliance Worries in the Time of Coronavirus

    NY Appellate Court Holds Common Interest Privilege Applies to Parties to a Merger

    Construction Recovery Still Soft in New Hampshire

    What You Need to Know About Notices of Completion, Cessation and Non-Responsibility

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2022 “Atlanta 500” List

    The Case For Designers Shouldering More Legal Responsibility

    California Department of Corrections Gets Hit With the Prison Bid Protest Blues

    A Changing Climate for State Policy-Making Regarding Climate Change

    South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs

    Resolve to Say “No” This Year

    Insurers' Communications Through Brokers Not Privileged

    Commencing of the Statute of Repose for Construction Defects

    Temporary Obstructions Are a Permanent Problem Under the Americans with Disabilities Act

    ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud

    Quick Note: If You Want to Recover Attorney’s Fees In a Contractual Dispute, Include a Prevailing Party Attorney’s Fees Provision

    Court of Appeal: Privette Doctrine Does Not Apply to Landlord-Tenant Relationships

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Factor the Factor in Factoring

    Texas Supreme Court Defines ‘Plaintiff’ in 3rd-Party Claims Against Design Professionals

    What Contractors Can Do to Address Rising Material Costs

    Condominium Association Wins $5 Million Judgment against Developer