BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Marietta Mississippi Subterranean parking expert witness Marietta Mississippi structural steel construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi condominiums expert witness Marietta Mississippi office building expert witness Marietta Mississippi production housing expert witness Marietta Mississippi condominium expert witness Marietta Mississippi townhome construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi high-rise construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi housing expert witness Marietta Mississippi landscaping construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi concrete tilt-up expert witness Marietta Mississippi tract home expert witness Marietta Mississippi custom homes expert witness Marietta Mississippi hospital construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi institutional building expert witness Marietta Mississippi casino resort expert witness Marietta Mississippi Medical building expert witness Marietta Mississippi custom home expert witness Marietta Mississippi mid-rise construction expert witness Marietta Mississippi industrial building expert witness Marietta Mississippi low-income housing expert witness Marietta Mississippi
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Marietta, Mississippi

    Mississippi Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1166/SB1081, HB722/SB2368) The New Home Warranty Act stipulates warranties for one-year and six-year periods limits types of defects; defines specific defects and exclusions such as outbuildings, detached garages, detached carports, swimming pools, recreational facilities, driveways, walkways, patios, boundary walls, retaining walls, bulkheads, fences, landscaping, off-site improvements, drainage, utilities, etc.; additional exclusions are negligence, improper maintenance, or improper operation, failure to comply with warranty requirements of manufacturer, inadequate ventilation, lack of mitigation, normal wear and tear, insect damage or "rotting of any kind", mold or mold damage, consequential damages, and defects in electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or similar fixture not manufactured by builder


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Marietta Mississippi

    State license required for commercial jobs over $100,000, city or county jobs over $50,000.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of North Central Miss
    Local # 2565
    PO Box 1132
    Oxford, MS 38655
    http://www.hbancm.com

    Home Builders & Remodelers Assn of NE MS
    Local # 2577
    PO Box 385
    Belden, MS 38826
    http://www.buildithere.com

    Corinth Alcorn Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 2505
    402 Franklin St Ste 1
    Corinth, MS 38834


    Home Builders Association of North Mississippi
    Local # 2559
    5699 Getwell Road Bldg G Ste 2
    Southhaven, MS 38672


    Home Builders Association of Grenada
    Local # 2579
    PO Box 353
    Grenada, MS 38901


    Golden Triangle Home Builders Association
    Local # 2509
    PO Box 2272
    Columbus, MS 39704
    http://www.goldentrianglehba.com

    Delta Chptr (Miss)
    Local # 2513
    120 E Church St
    Greenwood, MS 38935



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Marietta Mississippi

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract Language Matters

    Reservation of Rights Letter Merely Citing Policy Provisions Inadequate

    Colorado “occurrence”

    When to Withhold Retention Payments on Private or Public Projects

    Colorado Senate Bill 13-052 Dies in Committee

    Four Key Steps for a Successful Construction Audit Process

    No Bad Faith In Filing Interpleader

    Claims for Negligence? Duty to Defend Triggered

    Survey Finds Tough Labor Market Top-of-mind for Busy Georgia Contractors

    Court of Appeal Holds That Higher-Tiered Party on Construction Project Can be Held Liable for Intentional Interference with Contract

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    A Contract Is a Contract: Releases and Change Orders / Bilateral Modifications Are Construed as Contracts

    Court Addresses Damages Under Homeowners Insurance Policy

    Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year
    Cliffhanger: $451M Upgrade for Treacherous Stretch of Highway 1 in British Columbia

    Labor Development Impacting Developers, Contractors, and Landowners

    Pensacola Bridge Halted Due to Alleged Construction Defects

    World's Longest Suspension Bridge Takes Shape in Turkey

    How Artificial Intelligence Can Transform Construction

    Apple to Open Steve Jobs-Inspired Ring-Shaped Campus in April

    Congratulations to BWB&O Partner John Toohey and His Fellow Panel Members on Their Inclusion in West Coast Casualty’s 2022 Program!

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    DHS Awards Contracts for Border Wall Prototypes

    The Impact of Sopris Lodging v. Schofield Excavation on Timeliness of Colorado Construction Defect Claims

    Settlement Payment May Preclude Finding of Policy Exhaustion: Scottsdale v. National Union

    Federal Court Reiterates Broad Duty to Defend in Additional Insured Cases

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    It’s a COVID-19 Pandemic; It’s Everywhere – New Cal. Bill to Make Insurers Prove Otherwise

    California Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline to File Anti-SLAPP Motions in Light of Amended Pleadings

    No Bond, No Recovery: WA Contractors Must Comply With WA Statutory Requirements Or Risk Being Barred From Recovery If Their Client Refuses To Pay

    What is the True Value of Rooftop Solar Panels?

    Haight Welcomes Robert S. Rucci

    Big Waves and High Tides Can Be Just as Insidious as Hurricanes

    Federal Court Dismisses Coverage Action in Favor of Pending State Proceeding

    Payne & Fears LLP Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2024 “Best Law Firms” Rankings

    When Does it End?

    Can Your Small Business Afford to Risk the Imminent Threat of a Cyber Incident?

    Construction Leads World Trade Center Area Vulnerable to Flooding

    Mitigating the Consequences of Labor Unrest on Construction Projects

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    Subcontractor Exception to "Your Work" Exclusion Does Not Apply to Coverage Under Subcontractor's Policy

    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    Why and When Construction Robotics Makes Sense

    Industrialized Construction News 7/2022

    Do We Need Blockchain in Construction?

    Recovering Time and Costs from Hurricane Helene: Force Majeure Solutions for Contractors

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    Los Angeles Recovery Crews Begin to Mobilize as Wildfires Continue to Burn

    The Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Trial to Begin

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – Expert Testimony

    Will the YIMBY ‘Holy Grail’ Deliver an LA Building Boom?

    Get Creative to Solve Your Construction Company's Staffing Challenges

    Be Aware of Two New Statutes that Became Effective May 1, 2021

    California Booms With FivePoint New Schools: Real Estate

    Apartment Projects Fuel 13% Jump in U.S. Housing Starts

    Newark Trial Team Obtains Affirmance of Summary Judgment for General Contractor Client

    Delaware Supreme Court Won’t Halt Building

    Broker Not Liable for Failure to Reveal Insurer's Insolvency After Policy Issued

    Construction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year Ahead

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    If I Released My California Mechanics Lien, Can I File a New Mechanics Lien on the Same Project? Will the New Mechanics Lien be Enforceable?

    Business Risk Exclusions Bar Coverage for Construction Defect Claims
    Corporate Profile

    MARIETTA MISSISSIPPI CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Marietta, Mississippi Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with in house assets comprising registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Marietta construction industry.

    Marietta Mississippi ada design expert witnessMarietta Mississippi construction defect expert witnessMarietta Mississippi construction forensic expert witnessMarietta Mississippi eifs expert witnessMarietta Mississippi construction claims expert witnessMarietta Mississippi construction project management expert witnessMarietta Mississippi reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Marietta, Mississippi

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    May 05, 2026 —
    DENVER – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that eleven attorneys in its Denver office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers publication. Of those eleven, four were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    July 27, 2026 —
    Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    April 08, 2026 —
    The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025). The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    What Construction Attorneys Do and When Contractors Need Them

    August 11, 2026 —
    Direct Answer A construction attorney advises contractors on contracts, payment rights, mechanic's liens, payment bond claims, change orders, delay claims, OSHA matters, defect claims, terminations and dispute resolution. The work covers far more than lawsuits—much of its value comes before a dispute ever becomes formal. Construction attorneys help contractors protect payment rights, manage project risk, resolve disputes and avoid contract terms that can turn a profitable job into a financial loss. Their work covers more than lawsuits. A construction attorney may review a contract before bid day, help preserve lien rights, respond to a defective work claim, prepare for mediation or defend a contractor after a safety citation. For contractors, legal counsel is often most valuable before a dispute becomes formal. A missed notice deadline, vague scope clause, unsigned change order or broad indemnity provision can create problems long before a claim is filed. Construction attorneys help identify those risks while there is still time to negotiate, document the issue or preserve leverage. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Sometimes a General Damages Assessment is Enough. . .

    July 06, 2026 —
    It has been a while since I last posted here at Construction Law Musings. Life, law practice, and “blogger’s block” have taken their toll on the posting schedule. Hopefully this will be one of several upcoming posts now that the litigation schedule has lightened a bit over the summer. Today’s post is about damages. Specifically damage to a homeowner’s roof and her legal damages therefor. That last is of course a sentence that only a construction attorney (or other litigator) could possibly craft and have it make sense. Now, on with the case. . .In Hardesty Construction, Inc. v. Weedon, the facts are as follows: Ms. Weedon had hail damage to the roof of her home. She hired Hardesty Construction to repair and replace the roof. After the first roof was installed and failed inspection, a second roof was installed. The issue was that the first roof had a warranty and the second roof, installed similarly to the first (and allegedly with the same construction issues according to Ms. Weedon’s expert), was not provided with the promised warranty. As one may expect, Weedon sued Hardesty and Hardesty Construction for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract. At trial, Weedon testified, without objection, that her home was worth $40,000 less because of Hardesty Construction’s work, which was based partially on quotes Weedon received to fix the roof. The Circuit Court granted Hardesty Construction’s motion to strike Weedon’s fraudulent inducement claim, but not her other claims. A jury awarded Weedon $30,253.30 on her breach of contract claim. Hardesty Construction appealed, arguing the Circuit Court erred in (a) allowing the jury to consider Weedon’s valuation testimony because it was not based on her personal knowledge and (b) denying its motion to strike based on insufficient evidence as to damages. Weedon assigned cross-error in the Circuit Court’s decision to grant the motion to strike her fraudulent inducement claim against Samual Hardesty. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com