BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Acton Montana structural steel construction expert witness Acton Montana custom homes expert witness Acton Montana low-income housing expert witness Acton Montana condominium expert witness Acton Montana housing expert witness Acton Montana tract home expert witness Acton Montana parking structure expert witness Acton Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Acton Montana institutional building expert witness Acton Montana industrial building expert witness Acton Montana custom home expert witness Acton Montana casino resort expert witness Acton Montana townhome construction expert witness Acton Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Acton Montana condominiums expert witness Acton Montana production housing expert witness Acton Montana multi family housing expert witness Acton Montana hospital construction expert witness Acton Montana high-rise construction expert witness Acton Montana office building expert witness Acton Montana Medical building expert witness Acton Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Acton, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Acton Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Billings
    Local # 2722
    PO Box 875
    Billings, MT 59103
    http://www.hbabillings.net

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711


    SW Montana Building Industry Association
    Local # 2755
    1716 W Main St Ste 8 G
    Bozeman, MT 59715
    http://www.swmbia.org

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Upper Yellowstone Chapter
    Local # 2795
    PO Box 927
    Livingston, MT 59047
    http://www.uybaweb.com

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Acton Montana

    Carin Ramirez and David McLain recognized among the Best Lawyers in America© for 2021

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    HOA Fines Capped at $100: Immediate Impact of California’s AB 130

    Naples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford It

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Claims for Breach of Express Indemnity Clauses Subject to 10-Year Statute of Limitations

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    Getting U.S to Zero Carbon Will Take a $2.5 Trillion Investment by 2030

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Chicago Debt Document Says $8.5B O'Hare Revamp May Be Delayed

    Anthony Garasi, Jared Christensen and August Hotchkin are Recognized as Nevada Legal Elite

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Allocating Covered and Uncovered Damages in Jury Verdict

    NAHB Reports on U.S. Jobs Created from Home Building

    Allegations Confirm Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    California Pipeline Disaster Brings More Scandal for PG&E

    Products Liability Law – Application of Economic Loss Rule

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    Second Circuit Affirms Win for General Contractor on No Damages for Delay Provision

    New York Court Permits Asbestos Claimants to Proceed Against Insurers with Buyout Agreements

    Insurance for Large Construction Equipment Such as a Crane

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Abandons "Integrated Systems Analysis" for Determining Property Damage

    Colorado Senate Committee Approves Construction Defect Bill

    Drones, Googleplexes and Hyperloops

    Recommendations and Drafting Considerations for Construction Contingency Clauses Part III

    APROPLAN and GenieBelt Merge, Creating “LetsBuild” – the Build Phase End-to-End Digital Platform

    Be Careful with Continuous Breach and Statute of Limitations

    When OSHA Cites You

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    Texas Court Requires Insurer to Defend GC Despite Breach of Contract Exclusion

    ASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental Threats

    New Jersey Senate Advances Bad Faith Legislation

    Insurer Must Defend Where Possible Continuing Property Damage Occurred

    Angela Cooner Receives Prestigious ASA State Advocate Award

    Failing to Release A Mechanics Lien Can Destroy Your Construction Business

    Damages in First Trial Establishing Liability of Tortfeasor Binding in Bad Faith Trial Against Insurer

    United States Supreme Court Backtracks on Recent Trajectory Away from Assertions of General Jurisdiction in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2025 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    Insurer Prevails on Summary Judgment for Bad Faith Claim

    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    Falling Crime Rates Make Dangerous Neighborhoods Safe for Bidding Wars

    Illinois Federal Court Determines if Damages Are Too Remote

    Seven Trends That Impact Commercial Construction Litigation in 2021

    The Contingency Fee Multiplier (For Insurance Coverage Disputes)

    Tidal Lagoon Plans Marine Project to Power Every Home in Wales

    What to do When the Worst Happens: Responding to a Cybersecurity Breach

    Colorado’s New Construction Defect Law Takes Effect in September: What You Need to Know

    U.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to Lowest Since Early 1995

    How Machine Learning Can Help with Urban Development
    Corporate Profile

    ACTON MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Acton, Montana Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Acton and the surrounding areas.

    Acton Montana window expert witnessActon Montana expert witnesses fenestrationActon Montana consulting general contractorActon Montana structural engineering expert witnessesActon Montana multi family design expert witnessActon Montana construction code expert witnessActon Montana engineering consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Acton, Montana

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    April 08, 2026 —
    Imagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis. That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Seattle Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Real Estate Broker Professional Liability Action

    July 20, 2026 —
    Seattle Partner Kathleen A. Nelson and Associate Synova M. L. Edwards prevailed on a hotly contested motion for summary judgment in Whatcom County, Washington court in a real estate broker professional liability action. The plaintiff filed an action against Lewis Brisbois' clients, a real estate agent and brokerage firm, among several others, including the title company, purchasers and others related to the sale of real property following his complicated and long running divorce action. These claims primarily arose out of the clients’ reliance on an order signed by the court in the underlying divorce action. The order allowed the clients to execute the purchase and sale agreement, as the plaintiff was non-cooperative. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois