BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Alzada Montana production housing expert witness Alzada Montana industrial building expert witness Alzada Montana housing expert witness Alzada Montana casino resort expert witness Alzada Montana landscaping construction expert witness Alzada Montana Medical building expert witness Alzada Montana high-rise construction expert witness Alzada Montana custom homes expert witness Alzada Montana parking structure expert witness Alzada Montana retail construction expert witness Alzada Montana structural steel construction expert witness Alzada Montana multi family housing expert witness Alzada Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Alzada Montana hospital construction expert witness Alzada Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Alzada Montana low-income housing expert witness Alzada Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Alzada Montana condominiums expert witness Alzada Montana tract home expert witness Alzada Montana condominium expert witness Alzada Montana institutional building expert witness Alzada Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Alzada, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Alzada Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Yellowstone Chapter
    Local # 2795
    PO Box 927
    Livingston, MT 59047
    http://www.uybaweb.com

    SW Montana Building Industry Association
    Local # 2755
    1716 W Main St Ste 8 G
    Bozeman, MT 59715
    http://www.swmbia.org

    Home Builders Association of Billings
    Local # 2722
    PO Box 875
    Billings, MT 59103
    http://www.hbabillings.net

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711


    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Alzada Montana

    Sales Pickup Shows Healing U.S. Real Estate Market

    CRH to Buy Building-Products Firm Laurence for $1.3 Billion

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    Illinois Supreme Court Rules Labor Costs Not Depreciated to Determine Actual Cash Value

    Microsoft Said to Weigh Multibillion-Dollar Headquarters Revamp

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Determining Duty to Defend in Wisconsin Does Not Include Extrinsic Evidence

    Third Circuit Vacates Judgment for Insurer on Alleged Construction Defect Claim

    Untangling Unique Legal Issues in Modern Modular Construction

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (12/07/22) – Home Sales, EV Charging Infrastructure, and Office Occupancy

    Congratulations 2019 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Traub Lieberman Partners Lenhardt and Smith Obtain Directed Verdict in Broward County Failed Repair Sinkhole Trial

    Notice Provisions in Contracts Matter

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    The Prolonged Effects on Commercial Property From Extreme Weather

    An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract

    Obtaining Temporary Injunction to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement

    More In-Depth Details on the Davis-Bacon Act Overhaul

    Texas Court Requires Insurer to Defend GC Despite Breach of Contract Exclusion

    Not Just Another Client Alert about Cyber-Risk and Effective Cybersecurity Insurance Regulatory Guidance

    Wall Street Is Buying Starter Homes to Quietly Become America’s Landlord

    CFTC Establishes Climate-Risk Unit, Echoing Other Biden Administration Agency Themes

    As the Term Winds Down, Several Important Regulatory Cases Await the U.S. Supreme Court

    NYC Building Explosion Kills Two After Neighbor Reports Gas Leak

    New Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMA

    Recovering For Inflation On Federal Contracts: Recent DOD Guidance On Economic Price Adjustment Clauses

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Rely on Exclusions After Incorrectly Denying Defense

    Japan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant Offline

    Mid-Session Overview of Colorado’s 2017 Construction Defect Legislation

    EPA Issues Interpretive Statement on Application of NPDES Permit System to Releases of Pollutants to Groundwater

    Construction Firm Settles Suit Over 2012 Calif. Wildfire

    Construction Defect Class Action Lawsuit Alleges National Cover-up of Pipe Defects

    Learning from Production Homes of the Past

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Issues of Fact Prevent Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion in Collapse Case

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    RCW 60.30 – Contract Considerations

    City of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act

    Contractor’s Assignment of Construction Contract to Newly Formed Company Before Company Was Licensed, Not Subject to B&P 7031

    Do You Really Want Mandatory Arbitration in Your Construction Contract?

    A Tort, By Any Other Name, is Just a Tort: Massachusetts Court Bars Contract Claims That Sound in Negligence

    Elon Musk's Boring Co. Is Feuding With Texas Over a Driveway

    OSHA Aims to Address the Long Summer Days

    Study Finds Construction Cranes Vulnerable to Hacking

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2020 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Several Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers!

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers®

    Additional Elements a Plaintiff Must Plead and Prove to Enforce Restrictive Covenant

    Contractor Wins in Arbitration Only to Lose Before the Superior Court on Section 7031 Claim
    Corporate Profile

    ALZADA MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Alzada, Montana Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Alzada and the surrounding areas.

    Alzada Montana construction expert witness public projectsAlzada Montana construction code expert witnessAlzada Montana building envelope expert witnessAlzada Montana construction project management expert witnessesAlzada Montana expert witness structural engineerAlzada Montana slope failure expert witnessAlzada Montana expert witness commercial buildings
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Alzada, Montana

    Anomaly in Adding a Third-Party Claimant to a Liability Insurance Coverage Dispute

    May 05, 2026 —
    In an insurance coverage lawsuit seeking declaratory relief, an insurer sued the third-party claimant. The insurer was seeking a declaration that there was no coverage, which naturally would impact the third-party claimant. The insured did not respond to the lawsuit and the insurer moved for a default judgment which was objected to by the third-party claimant. The trial court granted a final judgment in favor of the insurer, which prompted an appeal from the third-party claimant because the final judgment impacts its rights to coverage if it obtains a judgment against the insured. The appellate court reversed but please take a look at this Court’s discussion on the issue of an insurer adding a third-party claimant to a coverage lawsuit when then the third-party cannot pursue a direct claim against the insurer until it obtains a settlement or judgment against the insured. It presents an interesting argument and counter-point for a third-party claimant that is added to the coverage lawsuit which has implications if it obtains a judgment against the insured: This case involves an apparent anomaly in Florida law. It is well-established that third-party claimants injured by an insured’s negligence have a right as third-party beneficiaries to payment from the insured’s insurance proceeds. It is equally well-established that the third-party claimants’ rights in this regard do not accrue unless and until they obtain a verdict or settlement against the insured. A quick review of this law is helpful at this point. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest

    February 02, 2026 —
    When it comes to contracts, there may be a clause that provides that untimely payments shall bear interest at a particular rate. Or it may be the statutory rate. That clause will come into play when determining prejudgment interest. In ANY dispute, prejudgment interest can be an important damages component that accrues from the date of the loss. Don’t ignore prejudgment interest. The Fourth District of Florida, in a construction dispute, maintained:
    “[I]f a plaintiff establishes that he sustained out-of-pocket loss, prejudgment interest must be awarded from the date of the loss. The trial court has no discretion regarding awarding prejudgment interest and must do so applying the statutory rate of interest in effect at the time the interest accrues.”
    Bensusan v. Design Engineering Group, LLC, 2025 WL 3466367 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (citation omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    April 14, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros’ client was a construction supervisor on a palatial mansion. The homeowners claimed millions of dollars in damages and asserted the client was a general contractor (GC) and so responsible for the alleged defects. Jeff and Ryan took more than 15 depositions, reinforcing their trial strategy theme: that the client was not a GC, but Plaintiffs were. They secured significant concessions from Plaintiffs, pressed Plaintiffs’ own negligent construction choices, and made the risk of trying the case intolerable. On the eve of trial, Plaintiffs backed down, settling out Jeff and Ryan’s client for $0.00. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    If You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)

    January 21, 2026 —
    The NC Board of Architecture and the NC Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (as well as other Boards, including the NC Licensing Board for General Contractors) have grievance procedures in which anyone – client or not—can file a grievance against you. That’s the bad news. The good news is that the Boards have seen it all before, and if the grievance is someone unhappy about a bill, or using the process to harass you for unfounded reasons, they will recognize those complaints for what they are. HOWEVER, this does not mean that you should treat any grievance, no matter how unfounded, lightly. The first thing you need to do is contact your insurance broker/agent and report the matter. Often times, your insurance carrier will hire an attorney (someone like me) to defend you free of charge (at least up to a certain dollar amount). This is part of your insurance coverage, and you should take full advantage of it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies

    March 10, 2026 —
    Volatile U.S. tariff announcements continue to affect international supply chains for U.S. construction projects. Although recent litigation has centered on the scope of presidential tariff authority rather than construction‑specific disputes, these decisions carry important implications for how parties structure risk in their contracts. In May 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) struck down certain “Liberation Day” tariffs as exceeding presidential authority under IEEPA. A federal district court in Washington, D.C. likewise issued a preliminary injunction suspending related tariffs—though it later stayed its own order pending appeal. And the Supreme Court has agreed to review cases addressing the legal limits of IEEPA‑based tariffs. While none of these developments arises from construction disputes, the themes they highlight—timing, statutory authority, and documentation—mirror the issues encountered when tariff conditions disrupt international procurement. The following strategies reflect practical steps U.S. project owners, contractors, and foreign suppliers can take to mitigate risk, drawing on drafting approaches now widely used across major construction forms, including—but not limited to—modified AIA agreements. Reprinted courtesy of Sara Beiro Farabow, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Michael Wagner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Farabow may be contacted at sfarabow@seyfarth.com Mr. Wagner may be contacted at mewagner@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    March 17, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter’s client owned a condo, which he rented out. The tenant allegedly assaulted Plaintiff across the street from the condo, resulting in personal injury, including nerve damage. Shanna did the research and writing, and Jeff argued the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court ruled, in pertinent part, that the subject assault off property was not foreseeable, resulting in a complete dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Can Foreclosure Sale Be Overturned Because Sale Price Is Grossly Inadequate?

    January 26, 2026 —
    Foreclosure actions are equity actions. See Verzura Construction, Inc. v. Hotel La Petitite Muse, LLC, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2500a (Fla. 3d DCA 2025). Can a sale price at a foreclosure auction sale be set aside because the foreclosed party believes the sale price is grossly inadequate? A recent case discusses this question and, as you will see, the argument that the sale price is grossly inadequate is not enough to overturn a sale. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com