BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Augusta Montana institutional building expert witness Augusta Montana retail construction expert witness Augusta Montana custom homes expert witness Augusta Montana condominiums expert witness Augusta Montana office building expert witness Augusta Montana custom home expert witness Augusta Montana Medical building expert witness Augusta Montana landscaping construction expert witness Augusta Montana casino resort expert witness Augusta Montana industrial building expert witness Augusta Montana housing expert witness Augusta Montana townhome construction expert witness Augusta Montana production housing expert witness Augusta Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Augusta Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Augusta Montana structural steel construction expert witness Augusta Montana high-rise construction expert witness Augusta Montana multi family housing expert witness Augusta Montana low-income housing expert witness Augusta Montana tract home expert witness Augusta Montana condominium expert witness Augusta Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Augusta, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Augusta Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404


    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901
    http://www.buildingflathead.com

    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801
    http://www.buildmissoula.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Augusta Montana

    Contractual “Pay if Paid” and “Pay when Paid” Clauses? What is a California Construction Subcontractor to Do?

    U.S. Firm Helps Thais to Pump Water From Cave to Save Boys

    1 De Haro: A Case Study on Successful Cross-Laminated Timber Design and Construction in San Francisco

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Estoppel Certificate? Estop and Check Your Lease

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Seven Coats Rose Attorneys Named to Texas Rising Stars List

    Lawmakers Strike Deal on New $38B WRDA

    Pine River’s Two Harbors Now Targets Non-Prime Mortgages

    LA Metro To Pay Kiewit $297.8M Settlement on Freeway Job

    Peckar & Abramson Once Again Recognized Among Construction Executive’s “Top 50 Construction Law Firms™”

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Time to Update Your Virginia Mechanic’s Lien Forms (July 1, 2019)

    Housing Woes Worse in L.A. Than New York, San Francisco

    Rhode Island Finds Pollution Exclusion Ambiguous, Orders Coverage for Home Heating Oil Leak

    Supreme Court Grants Petition for Review Regarding Necessary Parties in Lien Foreclosure Actions

    Four Key Steps for a Successful Construction Audit Process

    Janeen Thomas Installed as State Director of WWBA, Receives First Ever President’s Award

    Aurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect Ordinance

    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    Guarantor’s Liability on Partially Secured Debts – The Impacts of Pay Down Provisions in Serpanok Construction Inc. v. Point Ruston, LLC et al.

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2025 Guide

    Connecticut Federal District Court Follows Majority Rule on Insurance Policy Anti-Assignment Clauses

    Subcontractor Default Insurance (“SDI”): What Is It?

    At Least 32 Dead in Massive US Storm, Extreme Risks Remain

    “You’re Out of Here!” -- CERCLA (Superfund) Federal Preemption of State Environmental Claims in State Courts

    An Oregon School District Files Suit Against Robinson Construction Co.

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    Brooklyn’s Industry City to Get $1 Billion Modernization

    Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion on Business Risk Exclusions Fails

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Perez Broke Records … But Should He Have Settled Earlier?

    City of Seattle Temporarily Shuts Down Public Works to Enforce Health and Safety Plans

    Safety Officials Investigating Death From Fall

    BHA at the 10th Annual Construction Law Institute, Orlando

    Massachusetts High Court Allows Plaintiffs to Bring Contract-Based Construction Defects Claim After Expiration of Statute of Repose

    “It’s My Retainage and I Want It Now!” - Fundamentals to Requirements and Entitlement for Retainage

    Under the Hood of U.S. Construction Spending Is Revised Data

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael Logan and Associate Christian Romaguera Obtain Voluntary Dismissal in Favor of Construction Company Under the Vertical Immunity Doctrine

    Congratulations 2022 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Florida’s Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting Appellate Court Decisions on Concurrent Causation

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    Lawsuit Gives Teeth to Massachusetts Pay Law

    Employee Handbooks—Your First Line of Defense

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    The Construction Lawyer as Counselor

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized With Top Honor in Ranking Arizona: Top Law Firms for 2026

    Seabold Construction Ties Demise to Dispute with Real Estate Developer
    Corporate Profile

    AUGUSTA MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Augusta, Montana Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Augusta and the surrounding areas.

    Augusta Montana reconstruction expert witnessAugusta Montana construction expert witness consultantAugusta Montana construction defect expert witnessAugusta Montana structural engineering expert witnessesAugusta Montana expert witness roofingAugusta Montana construction forensic expert witnessAugusta Montana architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Augusta, Montana

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    September 21, 2026 —
    On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon granted a preliminary injunction in Renewable Northwest v. Hegseth, Case No. 3:26-cv-01092-IM, ordering the Department of Defense (DoD) to resume processing wind energy project applications under the existing statutory and regulatory framework and staying DoD’s review freeze pending final adjudication on the merits. Background In 2011, Congress created the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) within DoD to review wind energy projects that might affect military operations. When a wind project developer files an application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FAA refers it to DoD to determine whether the project poses an “unacceptable risk to the national security.” Reprinted courtesy of Victor J. Roehm III, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sara M. Ajeti, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Roehm may be contacted at vroehm@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Ms. Ajeti may be contacted at sajeti@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com