BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Dutton Montana industrial building expert witness Dutton Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Dutton Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Dutton Montana townhome construction expert witness Dutton Montana high-rise construction expert witness Dutton Montana multi family housing expert witness Dutton Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Dutton Montana custom home expert witness Dutton Montana custom homes expert witness Dutton Montana parking structure expert witness Dutton Montana production housing expert witness Dutton Montana tract home expert witness Dutton Montana condominium expert witness Dutton Montana condominiums expert witness Dutton Montana office building expert witness Dutton Montana landscaping construction expert witness Dutton Montana structural steel construction expert witness Dutton Montana low-income housing expert witness Dutton Montana institutional building expert witness Dutton Montana Medical building expert witness Dutton Montana casino resort expert witness Dutton Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dutton, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dutton Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901
    http://www.buildingflathead.com

    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404


    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801
    http://www.buildmissoula.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dutton Montana

    Residential Construction Rise Expected to Continue

    White and Williams Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions

    Pollution Created by Business Does Not Deprive Insured of Coverage

    NIST Florida Condo Collapse Probe Develops Dozens of Hypotheses

    US Energy Dept. Withdraws Federal ‘Zero-Emissions Building’ Definition

    Quick Note: Subcontractor Payment Bond = Common Law Payment Bond

    Middle District of Florida Disregards Other Insurance Clause Where Subcontractor Contractually Promised to Indemnify General Contractor

    Metrostudy Shows New Subdivisions in Midwest

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    New York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New York

    Not All Design-Build Projects are Created Equal

    Conflicting Exclusions Result in Duty to Defend

    Opoplan Introduces Generative AI Tools for Home-Building

    Preparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development Plan

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    Recommendations and Drafting Considerations for Construction Contingency Clauses Part III

    Tenth Circuit Finds Appraisal Can Decide Causation of Loss Under Colorado Law

    Texas Supreme Court Declines to Waive Sovereign Immunity in Premises Defect Case

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Examining Best Practices for Fire Protection of Critical Systems in Buildings

    Homebuilders Offer Hope for U.K. Economy

    Force Majeure and COVID-19 in Construction Contracts – What You Need to Know

    What Rich Millennials Want in a Luxury Home: 20,000 Square Feet

    South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs

    States and Municipalities Advance Climate Change Lawsuits as Trump Administration Seeks to Block Them

    New Legislation Requires Changes to your California Home Improvement Contract for 2026

    Is the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative Act

    Construction Slow to Begin in Superstorm Sandy Cases

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse

    Five Construction Payment Issues—and Solutions

    Designers “Airpocalyspe” Creations

    Construction Law: Unexpected, Fascinating, Bizarre

    Lewis Brisbois Appellate Team Scores Major Victory in Bad Faith Insurance Action

    Kahana Feld Welcomes Six Attorneys to the Firm in Q4 of 2023

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/11/22)

    Ambiguity Kills in Construction Contracting

    Pentagon Has Big Budget for Construction in Colorado

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Your Work Exclusion Applies to Damage to Tradesman's Property, Not Damage to Other Property

    So a Lawsuit Is on the Horizon…

    NY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective Sidewalk

    Once Again: Contract Terms Matter

    Snell & Wilmer Partner Jonathan Frank Named Winner of 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Guardrail Maker Defrauded U.S. of $175 Million and Created Hazard, Jury Says

    I’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare Professionals

    Construction Defects Claims Can Be Limited by Contract Says Washington Court

    Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company

    Contractor Entitled to Continued Defense Against Allegations of Faulty Construction

    ZEC 2.0: New York’s Zero Emissions Credit Program Gets an Extension and a Reboot
    Corporate Profile

    DUTTON MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Dutton, Montana Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Dutton and the surrounding areas.

    Dutton Montana construction expert testimonyDutton Montana building code expert witnessDutton Montana civil engineering expert witnessDutton Montana contractor expert witnessDutton Montana construction claims expert witnessDutton Montana testifying construction expert witnessDutton Montana delay claim expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dutton, Montana

    Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win

    February 23, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale associate Kyle Hollander recently secured a summary judgment victory for his client, Winn-Dixie, in a contested premises liability case. This was a hotly disputed liability case of water on the floor near an ice cooler with surveillance footage of a customer constantly bringing bags of ice to and from the cooler to the register. The plaintiff unknowingly stepped into the area of dripped melted ice and fell. Kyle successfully argued based on the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and the surveillance footage that Winn-Dixie didn’t have the requisite actual notice. Additionally, Kyle argued that the brief duration the condition remained on the floor was legally insufficient to establish constructive notice under Florida law. The Court agreed, finding that the evidence would not survive a directed verdict and granting summary judgment in favor of the defense. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]

    February 23, 2026 —
    Well, its that time of year again, the Virginia General Assembly is in session and looking to make changes to all kinds of things here in the Commonwealth. While most of those changes are well outside of the subject of Construction Law Musings, changes to the mechanic’s lien statutes certainly are not. This year, the Virginia General Assembly is poised to make some big changes if certain legislation gets out of committee and passes the legislature, a description and some comments on these follow: HB752 – Mechanics’ liens; liens attaching to property; memorandum of lien. [Original Description] Removes the exclusion of the attachment of a mechanic’s lien to property improved or repaired when the lien is based on a claim for repairs or existing structures. The bill further removes (i) the ability of a lien claimant to file any number of memoranda of lien including the details relating to the lien and (ii) the provisions of the Code specifying that no memorandum filed shall include sums due for (a) labor or materials furnished more than 150 days prior to the last day labor was performed or (b) material furnished to the job preceding the filing of such memorandum. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical Bulletin

    February 23, 2026 —
    Construction Safety Week has long been a powerful show of force, a catalyst for bringing the industry together and putting a spotlight on the critical importance of safety. It represents a shared commitment across an expansive and impactful Industry. The construction industry is a major employer and significant contributor to the U.S. economy, creating nearly $2.1 trillion worth of structures each year—and with that scale comes immense responsibility— and opportunity. Over the last decade, we’ve made meaningful strides: advancing best practices, transitioning from hard hats to helmets, shedding light on vital issues that affect safety, like mental health, fostering a culture of care and accountability, and creating partnerships and initiatives for improving jobsite safety. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Safety Week, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP is Proud to Host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace Award and Reception

    May 05, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to host the 20th Anniversary Virginia Barton Wallace (VBW) Award and Reception, which will celebrate this year’s honoree, The Rendell Center for Civics & Civic Engagement. This award was created to celebrate the remarkable career of Virginia “Ginny” Barton Wallace, the first woman to be elected to partnership not only at White and Williams but also at any law firm in Philadelphia. The VBW Award is presented to a woman or organization that embodies the same qualities that Ginny possessed: leadership, drive, exemplary work ethic, overall excellence in her field, or an ability to inspire other women to succeed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    On Checks and Balances

    March 03, 2026 —
    It’s called “checks and balances” for a reason. And, generally, it works well so long as there are clear boundaries between the “co-equal” branches of government. In Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 108 Cal.App.5th 243 (2025), the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld a set of regulations issued by the California Apprenticeship Council that contradicted an earlier 2015 ruling of the Court of Appeals. The Associated General Contractors of California Case At issue in the case was California’s Prevailing Wage Law which requires public works contractors to hire a certain ratio of apprentices. The purpose of the apprenticeship requirements is to maintain the pipeline of skilled tradespeople on taxpayer-funded projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Colorado Court Affirms Attorneys’ Fee Award Against Plaintiff’s Counsel for Pursuing Unsupported CCPA Claims

    August 03, 2026 —
    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000 in attorney fees against a plaintiffs’ attorney who continued to pursue unsupported claims arising out of a residential construction dispute. Although the opinion was not selected for official publication under C.A.R. 35(e) and therefore has no precedential value, it nevertheless provides an instructive reminder that Colorado courts are willing to impose significant financial consequences when claims lack substantial justification. For builders, developers, contractors, insurers, and defense counsel, the case is worth reading, not because it announces new law, but because it demonstrates that Colorado’s fee-shifting statute remains a meaningful tool when unsupported claims continue long after they should have been abandoned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com