BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Joliet Montana townhome construction expert witness Joliet Montana production housing expert witness Joliet Montana parking structure expert witness Joliet Montana tract home expert witness Joliet Montana housing expert witness Joliet Montana Medical building expert witness Joliet Montana high-rise construction expert witness Joliet Montana multi family housing expert witness Joliet Montana low-income housing expert witness Joliet Montana retail construction expert witness Joliet Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Joliet Montana office building expert witness Joliet Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Joliet Montana condominium expert witness Joliet Montana custom homes expert witness Joliet Montana landscaping construction expert witness Joliet Montana casino resort expert witness Joliet Montana custom home expert witness Joliet Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Joliet Montana institutional building expert witness Joliet Montana industrial building expert witness Joliet Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Joliet, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Joliet Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Yellowstone Chapter
    Local # 2795
    PO Box 927
    Livingston, MT 59047
    http://www.uybaweb.com

    SW Montana Building Industry Association
    Local # 2755
    1716 W Main St Ste 8 G
    Bozeman, MT 59715
    http://www.swmbia.org

    Home Builders Association of Billings
    Local # 2722
    PO Box 875
    Billings, MT 59103
    http://www.hbabillings.net

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711


    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Joliet Montana

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    Reminder: Always Order a Title Search for Your Mechanic’s Lien

    Construction Robotics: The Sentiment-Implementation Gap

    The Black Woman Architect Who Hopes to Change the Face of Design in America

    Japan Quake Triggers Landslides, Knocks Power Plant Offline

    Mortgage Company Fails to Prove Loss or Entitlement to Damages, Eliminating Recovery

    Waiver Of Arbitration by Not Submitting Claim to Initial Decision Maker…Really!

    South Africa Wants Payment From Colluding World Cup Builders

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    Harmon Towers Demolition Still Uncertain

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: RACHEL CLANCY

    Congratulations to Partner Nicole Whyte on Receiving the Marcus M. Kaufman Jurisprudence Award

    When it Comes to COVID Emergency Regulations, Have a Plan

    ENR 2024 Water Report: Managers Look to Potable Water Reuse

    Wheaton to Require Sprinklers in New Homes

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    The Contract Disputes Act: What Every Federal Government Contractor Should Know

    Haight’s Stevie Baris Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2021 Northern California Rising Stars

    Construction Contract Basics: No Damages for Delay

    CSLB “Fast Facts” for Online Home Improvement Marketplaces

    GRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    Virginia Chinese Drywall and pollution exclusion

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    "On Second Thought"

    Specific Performance: Equitable Remedy to Enforce Affirmative Obligation

    President Trump Implements Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

    Unpredictable Opinion Regarding Construction Lien (Reinstatement??)

    Massachusetts Appellate Court Confirms Construction Defects are Not Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policies

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims

    Georgia Court Reaffirms Construction Defect Decision

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    Alaska Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade

    A Matter Judged: Subrogating Insurers Should Beware of Prior Suits Involving the Insured

    Increase in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in January

    First Trump Agenda Nuggets Hit Construction

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    Do Engineers Owe a Duty to Third Parties?

    A Murder in Honduras Reveals the Dark Side of Clean Energy

    Court Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    Virtual Reality for Construction

    Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.

    The Colorado Supreme Court holds that loans made to a construction company are not subject to the Mechanic’s Lien Trust Fund Statute

    California Assembly Passes Expedited Dam Safety for Silicon Valley Act

    S&P Suspended and Fined $80 Million in SEC, State Mortgage Bond Cases
    Corporate Profile

    JOLIET MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Joliet, Montana Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Joliet and the surrounding areas.

    Joliet Montana concrete expert witnessJoliet Montana structural engineering expert witnessesJoliet Montana engineering consultantJoliet Montana engineering expert witnessJoliet Montana stucco expert witnessJoliet Montana building code expert witnessJoliet Montana slope failure expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Joliet, Montana

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    July 27, 2026 —
    Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    June 29, 2026 —
    If a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work. The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani