BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Larslan Montana institutional building expert witness Larslan Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Larslan Montana multi family housing expert witness Larslan Montana structural steel construction expert witness Larslan Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Larslan Montana Medical building expert witness Larslan Montana condominium expert witness Larslan Montana industrial building expert witness Larslan Montana hospital construction expert witness Larslan Montana retail construction expert witness Larslan Montana production housing expert witness Larslan Montana high-rise construction expert witness Larslan Montana parking structure expert witness Larslan Montana custom homes expert witness Larslan Montana housing expert witness Larslan Montana casino resort expert witness Larslan Montana low-income housing expert witness Larslan Montana tract home expert witness Larslan Montana townhome construction expert witness Larslan Montana custom home expert witness Larslan Montana office building expert witness Larslan Montana
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Larslan, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Larslan Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901
    http://www.buildingflathead.com

    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404


    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801
    http://www.buildmissoula.com

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602
    http://www.helenabia.com

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601
    http://www.montanabia.com

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840
    http://wwwbbiamontana.org

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Larslan Montana

    Appellate Team Secures Victory in North Carolina Governmental Immunity Personal Injury Matter

    Orchestrating Bias: Arbitrator’s Undisclosed Membership in Philharmonic Group with Pauly Shore’s Attorney Not Grounds to Reverse Award in Real Estate Dispute

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    Falling Crime Rates Make Dangerous Neighborhoods Safe for Bidding Wars

    Future Army Corps Rulings on Streams and Wetlands: Changes and Delays Ahead

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    Do Not Pass Go! Duty to Defend in a Professional Services Agreement (law note)

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    Construction Litigation Group Listed in U.S. News Top Tier

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    Ohio Supreme Court Holds No Occurence Arises from Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship

    Settlement Reached in California Animal Shelter Construction Defect Case

    Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Applied to Pass-Through Agreements

    TOP TAKE-AWAY SERIES: The 2023 Annual Meeting in Vancouver

    2019 California Construction Law Update

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No “Property Damage” Where Defective Component Failed to Cause Damage to Other Non-Defective Components

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Morrison Bridge Allegedly Crumbling

    Contractor Wins in Arbitration Only to Lose Before the Superior Court on Section 7031 Claim

    Veterans Day – Thank You for Your Service

    HHMR is pleased to announce that David McLain has been selected as a 2020 Super Lawyer

    Product Liability Alert: “Sophisticated User” Defense Not Available by Showing Existence of a “Sophisticated Intermediary”

    Underpowered AC Not a Construction Defect

    New York Climate Mobilization Act Update: Reducing Carbon Emissions and Funding Solutions

    New York Supreme Court Building Opening Delayed Again

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    Hurricane Damage Not Covered for Home Owner Not Named in Policy

    Segal McCambridge Expands West Coast Presence with the Addition of 36 Attorneys from Chapman Glucksman to Los Angeles Office

    California Supreme Court to Examine Arbitration Provisions in Several Upcoming Cases

    Construction Continues To Boom Across The South

    Staten Island Villa Was Home to Nabisco 'Nilla' Wafer Inventor

    Under New York Law a Recourse Provision Bars Most Claims Except for Fraud

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    'Right to Repair' and Fixing Equipment in a Digital Age

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian Claims

    Case-Shiller Redo Shows Less Severe U.S. Home-Price Slump

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Came too Late in Minnesota

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    Happenings in and around the 2016 West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team on Obtaining a Defense Verdict in Favor of their Subcontractor Client!

    Colorado Senate Bill 13-052 Dies in Committee

    U.S. Stocks Fluctuate Near Record After Housing Data

    Wait, You Want An HOA?! Restricting Implied Common-Interest Communities

    Expert's Opinions On Causation Leads Way To Summary Judgment For Insurer

    Wendel Rosen Construction Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    Texas Supreme Court Rules for Road Contractors in Critical Legal Immunity Test
    Corporate Profile

    LARSLAN MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Larslan, Montana Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Larslan region.

    Larslan Montana civil engineering expert witnessLarslan Montana concrete expert witnessLarslan Montana building consultant expertLarslan Montana delay claim expert witnessLarslan Montana construction claims expert witnessLarslan Montana construction scheduling expert witnessLarslan Montana eifs expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Larslan, Montana

    Endra Rethinks MEP Design with AI

    July 06, 2026 —
    Niklas Lindgren, co-founder and CEO of Endra, joins the AEC Business Podcast to discuss why his Stockholm-based startup is rebuilding MEP design from the ground up with AI. Endra recently raised $50 million in Series A funding and counts some of the world’s largest engineering consultancies as customers. Niklas explains why Revit’s underlying data model is too coarse to support deep automation, and why Endra built its own granular 3D data model instead of working as a plugin. He describes Endra’s “spatial AI” approach to routing conduit and ductwork without clashes, and how the platform models entire electrical systems, from receptacle to transformer, inside a single source of truth. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies

    May 26, 2026 —
    The 2026 Allianz Risk Barometer revealed some surprising findings for construction and engineering businesses. Now in its fifteenth year, this annual business risk ranking by corporate insurer Allianz Commercial incorporates the views of 3,338 global risk management professionals on the main perils on their radar for the year. Survey respondents included construction and engineering risk experts who identified the threats keeping them up at night. Here is how they ranked the top industry risks for 2026: Natural Catastrophes Natural catastrophe risk retains the top spot, with 38% of construction and engineering respondents citing this risk as their leading concern for 2026. From the insurance perspective, economic and insured losses remained high, albeit lower than the 10-year average. The evolving nature of natural catastrophes continues to pose significant challenges to businesses and the (re)insurance industry. Insured losses from natural catastrophes are set to reach $107 billion for 2025, according to Swiss Re—the sixth year in a row they have exceeded $100 billion, while economic losses are well in excess of $200 billion. Reprinted courtesy of Darren Tasker, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Navigating the New Frontier of Federal-State Energy Regulation: What Energy Companies Need to Know

    June 08, 2026 —
    Introduction The jurisdictional boundary between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the states is being actively contested, from challenges to landmark transmission planning rules to disputes over emergency cost-allocation orders, in ways that carry significant legal, financial, and operational implications for energy companies. For utilities, independent power producers, and transmission developers, understanding these dynamics is now a strategic imperative. The Jurisdictional Divide: A Bright Line That Isn’t The Federal Power Act divides authority between FERC and the states: FERC exercises jurisdiction over interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales, while states retain authority over generation facilities, retail rates, and decisions about resource mix. The D.C. Circuit has regularly been called upon to “referee the Federal Power Act’s jurisdictional line separating [FERC’s] jurisdiction over the federal wholesale market and States’ jurisdiction over facilities used in local distribution.”1 Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi