BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Greeley County Nebraska casino resort expert witness Greeley County Nebraska custom homes expert witness Greeley County Nebraska parking structure expert witness Greeley County Nebraska retail construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska landscaping construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska housing expert witness Greeley County Nebraska industrial building expert witness Greeley County Nebraska multi family housing expert witness Greeley County Nebraska low-income housing expert witness Greeley County Nebraska condominiums expert witness Greeley County Nebraska condominium expert witness Greeley County Nebraska production housing expert witness Greeley County Nebraska tract home expert witness Greeley County Nebraska office building expert witness Greeley County Nebraska Medical building expert witness Greeley County Nebraska Subterranean parking expert witness Greeley County Nebraska structural steel construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska hospital construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska townhome construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska institutional building expert witness Greeley County Nebraska high-rise construction expert witness Greeley County Nebraska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Greeley County, Nebraska

    Nebraska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Actions alleging a breach of warranty and construction defect are governed by a four-year statute of limitations (which may be extended by two years if the cause of action is not or could not reasonably have been discovered within the four-year period) and a ten-year statute of repose for latent defects.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Greeley County Nebraska

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting, however, local licensure is needed in counties with populations over 100,000. Licensure is required for the electrical trade.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 2805
    3121 39th St
    Columbus, NE 68601


    Home Builders Association of the Norfolk Area
    Local # 2890
    PO Box 425
    Tilden, NE 68781


    Metro Omaha Builders Assn
    Local # 2872
    4141 N 156th Street Ste 100
    Omaha, NE 68116
    http://www.moba.com

    North Platte Chapter
    Local # 2854
    PO Box 146
    North Platte, NE 69103


    Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2818
    131 North Grace
    Grand Island, NE 68803


    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542
    http://www.nshba.org

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Greeley County Nebraska

    When Do Hard-Nosed Negotiations Become Coercion? Or, When Should You Feel Unlucky?

    Veterans Day – Thank You for Your Service

    Two More Lawsuits Filed Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses

    Recession Graduates’ Six-Year Gap in Homeownership

    “Made in America Week” Highlights Requirements, Opportunities for Contractors and Suppliers

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    Filing Motion to Increase Lien Transfer Bond (Before Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction Over Final Judgment)

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    London Office Builders Aren’t Scared of Brexit Anymore

    COVID-19 Case Remanded for Failure to Meet Amount in Controversy

    Florida Condo Collapse Victims Reach $1 Billion Settlement

    Locals Concerns over Taylor Swift’s Seawall Misdirected

    Thanks for My 6th Year Running as a Construction Litigation Super Lawyer

    Congratulations to Haight’s 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment After Insured Fails to Establish Claim is Covered

    Prevailing Wages Don’t Stop at the Jobsite, Says Washington Court

    California Ranks As Leading State for Green Building in 2022

    Arctic Fires Are Melting Permafrost That Keeps Carbon Underground

    Conditional Judgment On Replacement Costs Awarded

    Express Warranty Trumping Spearin’s Implied Warranty

    There Are Consequences to Executed Documents Such as the Accord and Satisfaction Defense

    ICYMI: Highlights From ABC Convention 2024

    Defeating the Ten-Year Statute of Repose For Latent Construction Defects

    ASCE Statement on Biden Administration Permitting Action Plan

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    Defense Owed to Insured Subcontractor, but not to Additional Insured

    New Jersey Court Adopts Continuous Trigger for Construction Defect Claims

    Chambers USA 2021 Recognizes Five Partners and Two Practices at Lewis Brisbois

    KONE is Shaking Up the Industry with BIM

    Mediation Confidentiality Bars Malpractice Claim but for How Long?

    What Types of “Damages Claims” Survive a Trustee’s Sale?

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    What If Your CCP 998 Offer is Silent on Costs?

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Utah for Damage Caused By Faulty Workmanship

    What Prevents Innovation in Construction from Taking Off

    Another Reason to Love Construction Mediation (Read: Why Mediation Works)

    Insurer Must Defend General Contractor

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    Montana Trial Court Holds That Youths Have Standing to Bring Constitutional Claims Against State Government For Alleged Climate Change-Related Harms

    Denial of Claim for Concealment or Fraud Reversed by Sixth Circuit

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Jinx: Third Circuit Rules in Favor of Teamsters in Withdrawal Case

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    Previously Owned U.S. Home Sales Rise to Eight-Month High

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Product Defect Allegations Trigger Duty To Defend in Pennsylvania

    No Duty to Defend Under Pollution Policy

    Even Fraud in the Inducement is Tough in Construction
    Corporate Profile

    GREELEY COUNTY NEBRASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Greeley County, Nebraska Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Greeley County and the surrounding areas.

    Greeley County Nebraska forensic architectGreeley County Nebraska construction cost estimating expert witnessGreeley County Nebraska expert witnesses fenestrationGreeley County Nebraska slope failure expert witnessGreeley County Nebraska roofing and waterproofing expert witnessGreeley County Nebraska fenestration expert witnessGreeley County Nebraska concrete expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Greeley County, Nebraska

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Four HHMR Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of Best Lawyers®

    September 21, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is proud to announce that Best Lawyers® has recognized four HHMR attorneys in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America for their work in construction law and construction litigation. David M. McLain, Lisa Bondy Dunn, and Steven L. Heisdorffer earned recognition in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. Ricky L. Nolen, Jr. earned recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. For a firm that has deliberately focused its practice on construction law and construction litigation for nearly 25 years, we take particular pride in seeing that focus reflected in the recognition of lawyers across different generations of HHMR. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    April 08, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation. Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com