BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Swanton Nebraska industrial building expert witness Swanton Nebraska condominiums expert witness Swanton Nebraska housing expert witness Swanton Nebraska parking structure expert witness Swanton Nebraska townhome construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska Subterranean parking expert witness Swanton Nebraska retail construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska concrete tilt-up expert witness Swanton Nebraska high-rise construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska production housing expert witness Swanton Nebraska institutional building expert witness Swanton Nebraska custom home expert witness Swanton Nebraska casino resort expert witness Swanton Nebraska multi family housing expert witness Swanton Nebraska custom homes expert witness Swanton Nebraska mid-rise construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska hospital construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska low-income housing expert witness Swanton Nebraska structural steel construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska condominium expert witness Swanton Nebraska landscaping construction expert witness Swanton Nebraska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Swanton, Nebraska

    Nebraska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Actions alleging a breach of warranty and construction defect are governed by a four-year statute of limitations (which may be extended by two years if the cause of action is not or could not reasonably have been discovered within the four-year period) and a ten-year statute of repose for latent defects.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Swanton Nebraska

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting, however, local licensure is needed in counties with populations over 100,000. Licensure is required for the electrical trade.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Lincoln
    Local # 2836
    6100 S 58th St Ste C
    Lincoln, NE 68516
    http://www.hbal.org

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847


    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542
    http://www.nshba.org

    Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2818
    131 North Grace
    Grand Island, NE 68803


    North Platte Chapter
    Local # 2854
    PO Box 146
    North Platte, NE 69103


    Metro Omaha Builders Assn
    Local # 2872
    4141 N 156th Street Ste 100
    Omaha, NE 68116
    http://www.moba.com

    Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 2805
    3121 39th St
    Columbus, NE 68601



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Swanton Nebraska

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    A Place to Study Eternity: Building the Giant Magellan Telescope

    Risk Management and Contracting after Hurricane Irma: Suggestions to Avoid a Second Disaster

    Appellate Court reverses district court’s finding of alter ego in Sedgwick Properties Development Corporation v. Christopher Hinds (2019WL2865935)

    Job Gains a Positive for Housing

    The Future of High-Rise is Localized and Responsive

    Margins May Shrink for Home Builders

    The 2017 ASCDC and CDCMA Construction Defect Seminar and Holiday Reception

    From ‘Cuckoo’s Egg’ to Today’s Cyber Threat Landscape

    "Damage to Your Product" Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    Foreclosures Decreased Nationally in September

    Unprecedented Times: An Interview Panel With 2025 Top Construction Law Firms

    Triggering Duty to Advance Costs Same Standard as Duty to Defend

    Supreme Court of Kentucky Holds Plaintiff Can Recover for Stigma Damages in Addition to Repair Costs Resulting From Property Damage

    eRent: Construction Efficiency Using Principles of the Sharing Economy

    Understanding the California Consumer Privacy Act

    Remote Trials Can Control Prejudgment Risk

    White House’s New Draft Guidance Limiting NEPA Review of Greenhouse Gas Impacts Is Not So New or Limiting

    GRSM Ranks Among World’s 70 Largest Law Firms in 2025 Global 200 Rankings

    Recommendations for Property Owners After A Hurricane: Submit a Claim

    Construction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3

    Proposed Law Protecting Tenants Amended: AB 828 Updated

    General Contractor Supporting a Subcontractor’s Change Order Only for Owner to Reject the Change

    Changing Course Midstream Did Not Work in River Dredging Project

    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    Colorado Rejects Bill to Shorten Statute of Repose

    Contractual Assumption of Liability Does Not Bar Coverage

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage Denied

    Congratulations to Arizona Managing Partner John Belanger and Associate Ryan Leibel on Securing a Win at Arbitration!

    The Impact of Sopris Lodging v. Schofield Excavation on Timeliness of Colorado Construction Defect Claims

    Delaware Supreme Court Choice of Law Ruling Vacates a $13.7 Million Verdict Against Travelers

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    Application of Set-Off When a Defendant Settles in Multiparty Construction Dispute

    Defining a Property Management Agreement

    The Importance of a Notice of Completion to Contractors, Subcontractors and Suppliers

    California Supreme Court Rejects Insurers' Bid for Horizontal Exhaustion Rule in New Montrose Decision

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Expert's Opinions On Causation Leads Way To Summary Judgment For Insurer

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/18/22)

    Application of Set-Off When Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Quick Note: Discretion in Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees

    Index Demonstrates Increase in Builders’ Sentiment

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 49 White and Williams Attorneys

    "Your Work" Exclusion Bars Coverage for Contractor's Faulty Workmanship

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    White and Williams Ranked in Top Tiers of "Best Law Firms"

    EEOC Suit Alleges Site Managers Bullied Black Workers on NY Project

    Contract Disruptions: Navigating Supply Constraints and Labor Shortages
    Corporate Profile

    SWANTON NEBRASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Swanton, Nebraska Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing in house assets which include building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Swanton and the surrounding areas.

    Swanton Nebraska construction cost estimating expert witnessSwanton Nebraska architecture expert witnessSwanton Nebraska slope failure expert witnessSwanton Nebraska testifying construction expert witnessSwanton Nebraska construction claims expert witnessSwanton Nebraska delay claim expert witnessSwanton Nebraska construction code expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Swanton, Nebraska

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    House Passes ABC-Supported Permitting Reform Legislation

    February 02, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON, Dec. 18—Associated Builders and Contractors applauded the U.S. House of Representatives for passing two comprehensive, ABC-supported permitting reform bills: H.R. 3898, the Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today Act, and H.R. 4776, the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act. Reprinted courtesy of ABC, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Court Rules Cook County Misspent $243M in Transportation Funds

    March 10, 2026 —
    A Cook County Illinois Circuit Court judge has ruled that the county violated the state constitution by using $243 million in transportation tax revenue during fiscal 2023 for non-transportation purposes, handing a legal win to a statewide coalition of construction trade groups. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    When Your Scheduler Hallucinates: Managing AI Risk on the Job Site

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence has moved from the conference room to the construction site. Contractors are using AI-powered tools to predict schedule delays, monitor safety through drone footage, optimize equipment maintenance and flag potential hazards in real time. These tools deliver genuine efficiency gains, but they also introduce risks that most construction contracts do not anticipate and many project teams aren’t yet equipped to manage. The problem is that AI tools are probabilistic and not determinative, meaning that they can “hallucinate”: generating confident, but completely wrong, information. Your AI scheduling software might therefore predict a delay that never materializes, causing unnecessary resource mobilization. Your drone monitoring might flag a nonexistent safety hazard, stopping work and costing productivity. Or worse, it might miss a real hazard entirely. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Loring, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Loring may be contacted at jloring@joneswalker.com

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    New York Amends Prompt Payment Act: Retainage Above 5% in Private Construction Contracts Now Void

    February 10, 2026 —
    In 2023 New York overhauled its Prompt Payment Act. The 2023 amendments, largely aimed at restricting the amount of retainage that can be withheld on private projects, were unclear about whether parties could contract around the statute, as they can with other provisions of the statute. The State Legislature recently clarified that issue. On December 19, 2025, New York enacted a new law, tightening the State’s Prompt Payment Act retainage laws by amending the Prompt Payment Act under General Business Law § 757. Under § 757, the new law renders void any contract provision in private construction contracts that requires retainage in excess of 5% of the total contract sum, meaning owners cannot hold more than 5% from their prime contractors and prime contractors cannot hold more than 5% from their subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Patrick T. Murray, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Skyler L. Santomartino, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Murray may be contacted at pmurray@pecklaw.com Mr. Santomartino may be contacted at ssantomartino@pecklaw.com Read the full story...