BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire concrete tilt-up expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire Medical building expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire high-rise construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire housing expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire institutional building expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire condominiums expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire structural steel construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire condominium expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire hospital construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire industrial building expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire production housing expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire low-income housing expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire landscaping construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire custom homes expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire mid-rise construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire parking structure expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire townhome construction expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire Subterranean parking expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire multi family housing expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire tract home expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire office building expert witness East Wakefield New Hampshire
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    East Wakefield, New Hampshire

    New Hampshire Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Pursuant to HB 459; Title XXXI; Ch. 359-G, Sections 4 & 5 homeowners or their agents have 60 days to submit a complaint (in writing) regarding a construction defect. The builder receiving notice has 21 days to respond (in writing) to inspect, to settle or dispute the claim. The law restricts liability through "comparative negligence or failure to perform normal and reasonable maintenance," among others.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines East Wakefield New Hampshire

    Licensure is required for certain specialty trades: asbestos and lead abatement, electrical, and plumbing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lakes Region Bldrs & Remod Association
    Local # 3012
    355 Oakcrest Road
    Bristol, NH 03222


    Concord Area Builders Association
    Local # 3010
    48 Lesmerises Road
    Loudon, NH 03307


    White Mountain Home Builders & Remodelers
    Local # 3090
    PO Box 183
    North Conway, NH 03860


    Connecticut Valley Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3005
    PO Box 903
    Charlestown, NH 03603
    http://www.ourhba.com

    Home Builders & Remodeling Association of NH
    Local # 3000
    119 Airport Rd
    Concord, NH 03301
    http://www.hbranh.com

    Home Builders Association of Seacoast Region
    Local # 3080
    PO Box 1453
    Portsmouth, NH 03802
    http://www.seacoasthba.com

    Home Builders Association of Manchester
    Local # 3060
    PO Box 5172
    Manchester, NH 03108
    http://www.gmhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For East Wakefield New Hampshire

    OSHA Investigating Bridge Accident Resulting in Construction Worker Fatality

    Inverse Condemnation and Roadwork

    Unable To Afford an Appellate Bond? You May Be “Indigent” And Qualify for a Discretionary Waiver or Reduction of the Bond Amount.

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    The Rise of Modular Construction – Impacts for Consideration

    Court Upholds Denial of Collapse Coverage Where Building Still Stands

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    Newmeyer Dillion Secures Victory For Crown Castle In Years-Long Litigation With City Council Of Piedmont Over Small Cell Wireless Telecommunications Sites

    Wow! A Mechanic’s Lien Bill That Helps Subcontractors and Suppliers

    Navigating Casualty Challenges and Opportunities

    Nobody Knows What Lies Beneath New York City

    Brazil's Detained Industry Captain Says No Plea Deals Coming

    A Year-End Review of the Environmental Regulatory Landscape

    Indemnity: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You!

    Green Energy Can Complicate Real Estate Foreclosures

    Obtaining Temporary Injunction to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Agent May Be Liable for Failing to Submit Claim

    Federal Public Works Construction Collection Remedies: The Miller Act Payment Bond Claim

    Intentionally Set Atlanta Interstate Fire Closes Artery Until June

    Biden's Next 100 Days: Major Impacts Expected for the Construction Industry

    Construction Defects Claims Can Be Limited by Contract Says Washington Court

    New York City Construction: Boom Times Again?

    Surviving a Tornado – How to Navigate Insurance Claims in the Wake of the Recent Connecticut Storm

    Engineer and CNA Dispute Claim Over Dual 2014 Bridge Failures

    Considerations in Obtaining a Mechanic’s Lien in Maryland (Don’t try this at home)

    The Ups and Downs of Elevator Maintenance Contractor's Policy Limits

    White and Williams LLP is Honored to be Recognized Among the 2026 Best Law Firms Ranked by Best Lawyers®

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Buyer Alleges Condo Full of Mold and Mice

    A Court-Side Seat: SCOTUS Clarifies Alien Tort Statute and WOTUS Is Revisited

    California’s Retention Reform on Private Construction Projects

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    2017 California Employment Law Update

    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project.

    Massachusetts Judge Holds That Insurer Breached Its Duty To Defend Lawsuit After Chemical Spill

    LA Wildfires Push California Insurance Market to Its Limit

    Consulting Firm Indicted and Charged with Falsifying Concrete Reports

    Faulty Workmanship Claims Amount to Multiple Occurrences

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    Oregon Bridge Closed to Inspect for Defects

    Surety Bond Now a Valid Performance Guarantee for NC Developers (guest post)

    Seven Proactive Steps to Avoid Construction Delay Disputes

    Insurer Doomed in Delaware by the Sutton Rule

    Happy Thanksgiving from CDJ

    Recent Statutory Changes Cap Retainage on Applicable Construction Projects

    Appraisers May Determine Causation

    Tips for Contractors Who Want to Help Rebuild After the California Wildfires

    Giant Gas Pipeline Owner, Contractor in $900M Payment Battle

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 40 White and Williams Lawyers
    Corporate Profile

    EAST WAKEFIELD NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction claims related expert witness designations, the East Wakefield, New Hampshire Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to East Wakefield region.

    East Wakefield New Hampshire expert witness windowsEast Wakefield New Hampshire building expertEast Wakefield New Hampshire consulting general contractorEast Wakefield New Hampshire construction expert witnessEast Wakefield New Hampshire civil engineering expert witnessEast Wakefield New Hampshire construction cost estimating expert witnessEast Wakefield New Hampshire ada design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    East Wakefield, New Hampshire

    Fight for Your Right: Effects of FAR Final Rule on Construction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Since the Federal Acquisition Regulation final rule Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects took effect, contractors seeking to compete for federal projects of $35 million or more must “negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations.” While this requirement significantly reduces competition for covered procurements, contractors may seek to restore competition on individual solicitations by filing a bid protest with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Bid protests through the COFC become possible once a federal agency posts a solicitation that includes contract provisions mandating a PLA. (In some cases, a presolicitation notice that a PLA mandate will be applied may be sufficient.) Reprinted courtesy of Michael Altman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Altman may be contacted at altman@abc.org

    Federal Court Pauses New Mexico PFAS Labeling Rule, but Not Its Bans or Reporting Deadline

    October 26, 2026 —
    As we previously reported, New Mexico adopted novel product labeling requirements that would require manufacturers to display a PFAS flask symbol on covered products. Those requirements are now on hold. A coalition of industry associations led by the American Chemistry Council sued in federal court, arguing that the mandate unconstitutionally compels speech in violation of the First Amendment. On September 16, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the labeling rule while the case, American Chemistry Council v. Kenney, No. 1:26-cv-02130-MIS-SCY, proceeds. The court found the challengers likely to succeed because New Mexico had not shown a reasonable fit between the label and its interests in protecting consumer health and the environment. A Broad Rule Built Around One Symbol New Mexico enacted its PFAS Protection Act in April 2025, joining Maine and Minnesota as the third state to adopt broad reporting requirements and eventual sales restrictions for products containing intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The Act also authorized the Environmental Improvement Board to require PFAS labels on products. The Board’s implementing rule, which became effective July 1, 2026, specified the exact format of the label and how it had to appear. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Claudia Vetesi, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Vetesi may be contacted at claudia.vetesi@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    September 21, 2026 —
    On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon granted a preliminary injunction in Renewable Northwest v. Hegseth, Case No. 3:26-cv-01092-IM, ordering the Department of Defense (DoD) to resume processing wind energy project applications under the existing statutory and regulatory framework and staying DoD’s review freeze pending final adjudication on the merits. Background In 2011, Congress created the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) within DoD to review wind energy projects that might affect military operations. When a wind project developer files an application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FAA refers it to DoD to determine whether the project poses an “unacceptable risk to the national security.” Reprinted courtesy of Victor J. Roehm III, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sara M. Ajeti, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Roehm may be contacted at vroehm@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Ms. Ajeti may be contacted at sajeti@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    A Green Light for Housing? What Executive Order 14394 Means for Your Next Project

    May 26, 2026 —
    On March 13, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14394, “Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Home Construction” (the “Order”). The Order directs federal agencies to reduce regulatory burdens on residential development, streamline environmental permitting, and encourage state and local governments to adopt housing-friendly policies. The Order includes several key provisions that developers and homebuilders should be aware of moving forward. Key Provisions The Order targets four main areas: 1. Federal Environmental Regulations First, it directs the Secretary of the Army and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise permitting standards, including stormwater permits, wetlands permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and related construction-site requirements. The Order also targets energy-efficiency mandates for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) financed housing. For developers and homebuilders, these revisions could reduce project delays and compliance costs associated with stormwater management, wetlands mitigation, and energy-efficiency upgrades, expenses that often add significant time and cost to residential development projects. Reprinted courtesy of Bennett Houck, Snell & Wilmer, Miranda Martinez, Snell & Wilmer and Byron Sarhangian, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Houck may be contacted at bhouck@swlaw.com Ms. Martinez may be contacted at mimartinez@swlaw.com Mr. Sarhangian may be contacted at bsarhangian@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com