BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire low-income housing expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire concrete tilt-up expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire office building expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire tract home expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire industrial building expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire multi family housing expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire custom homes expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire condominium expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire retail construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire parking structure expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire high-rise construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire condominiums expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire structural steel construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire production housing expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire Subterranean parking expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire custom home expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire housing expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire casino resort expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire mid-rise construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire landscaping construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire townhome construction expert witness Sullivan County New Hampshire
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sullivan County, New Hampshire

    New Hampshire Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Pursuant to HB 459; Title XXXI; Ch. 359-G, Sections 4 & 5 homeowners or their agents have 60 days to submit a complaint (in writing) regarding a construction defect. The builder receiving notice has 21 days to respond (in writing) to inspect, to settle or dispute the claim. The law restricts liability through "comparative negligence or failure to perform normal and reasonable maintenance," among others.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sullivan County New Hampshire

    Licensure is required for certain specialty trades: asbestos and lead abatement, electrical, and plumbing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remodeling Association of NH
    Local # 3000
    119 Airport Rd
    Concord, NH 03301
    http://www.hbranh.com

    Connecticut Valley Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3005
    PO Box 903
    Charlestown, NH 03603
    http://www.ourhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Seacoast Region
    Local # 3080
    PO Box 1453
    Portsmouth, NH 03802
    http://www.seacoasthba.com

    Concord Area Builders Association
    Local # 3010
    48 Lesmerises Road
    Loudon, NH 03307


    Home Builders Association of Manchester
    Local # 3060
    PO Box 5172
    Manchester, NH 03108
    http://www.gmhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern NH
    Local # 3040
    181 Washington St
    Keene, NH 03431
    http://hbraswnh.com/index/index

    Southern NH Home Builders & RA
    Local # 3030
    PO Box 495
    Londonderry, NH 03053
    http://www.snhhbra.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sullivan County New Hampshire

    Third Circuit Vacates Judgment for Insurer on Alleged Construction Defect Claim

    Protect Against Design Errors With Owners Protective Professional Indemnity Coverage

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Court Slams the Privette Door on Independent Contractor’s Bodily Injury Claim

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Bizarre Case That Required a 117-Year-Old Expert

    U.S. Housing Starts Top Forecast on Single-Family Homes

    Environmental Justice Legislation Update

    New York Bars Developers from Selling Condos due to CD Fraud Case

    Beginning of the 2020 Colorado Legislative Session: Here We Go Again

    Anatomy of a Data Center

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (07/05/23) – A Hospitality Strike in Southern California, Agencies Step in With Lenders and the Social in ESG

    Cross-Office Team Secures Summary Judgment Win in Negligence Action with $2M Demand

    Bremer Whyte’s Newport Beach Team Prevails on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a Wrongful Death Case!

    Connecticut District Court to Review Proposed Class Action in Defective Concrete Suit

    Contractor Entitled to Defense for Alleged Faulty Workmanship of Subcontractor

    Life After McMillin: Do Negligence and Strict Liability Causes of Action for Construction Defects Still Exist?

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    After $15 Million Settlement, Association Gets $7.7 Million From Additional Subcontractor

    The Importance of Retrofitting Existing Construction to Meet Sustainability Standards

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Traub Lieberman Partners Lauren S. Curtis and Sarah A. Wilkins and Associate Veronica Guerra Win Motion for Summary Judgment

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    Texas Case Exposes Cracks in the Government Contractor Immunity Shield

    The Murky Waters Between "Good Faith" and "Bad Faith"

    Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Vexed by Low Demand for Mortgages

    A Construction Stitch in Time

    Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act of 2020: Yet Another Reason to Promptly Notify Insurers of COVID-19 Losses

    The Treasures Inside Notre Dame Cathedral

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    The One New Year’s Resolution You’ll Want to Keep if You’re Involved in Public Works Projects

    Congratulations to San Diego Lawyers JohnPaul Salem and Kaylan Bland-Fetter on a Fantastic Result for their HOA Client!

    How Many New Home Starts are from Teardowns?

    Owners Should Serve Request for Sworn Statement of Account on Lienor

    Excess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By Excess

    L.A. Makes $4.5 Billion Bet on Olympics After Boston Backs Out

    It’s Too Late, Lloyd’s: New York Federal Court Finds Insurer Waived Late Notice Defense

    New York Nonprofit Starts Anti-Scaffold Law Video Series

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    Guidance for Construction Leaders: How Is the Americans With Disabilities Act Applied During the Pandemic?

    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    US-Mexico Border Wall Bids Include Tourist Attraction, Solar Panels

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    A Good Read on Fraud versus Contract

    Common Law Indemnity Claim Affirmed on Justifiable Beliefs

    Does the UCC Apply to the Contract for the Sale of Goods and Services

    California Team Secures Appellate Victory on Behalf of Celebrity Comedian Kathy Griffin in Dispute with Bel Air Neighbor

    Mortgage Firms Face Foreclosure Ban Until 2022 Under CFPB Plan

    Using Ambient Sound as Construction Progress Indicator
    Corporate Profile

    SULLIVAN COUNTY NEW HAMPSHIRE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Sullivan County, New Hampshire Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Sullivan County and the surrounding areas.

    Sullivan County New Hampshire eifs expert witnessSullivan County New Hampshire defective construction expertSullivan County New Hampshire expert witnesses fenestrationSullivan County New Hampshire window expert witnessSullivan County New Hampshire expert witness windowsSullivan County New Hampshire construction expert witness consultantSullivan County New Hampshire construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sullivan County, New Hampshire

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    March 10, 2026 —
    Recent amendments to New York’s RPAPL § 881 will significantly change how project teams obtain and maintain access to adjoining properties for construction-related work. The 2025 amendment signed into law by Governor Hochul, and the newly enacted 2026 revisions, will directly impact general contractors (GCs) and construction managers (CMs), as well as their trade contractors who regularly confront neighbor‑access, support‑of‑excavation, and protection‑of‑adjoining‑property challenges. Although we do not advise that GCs and CMs get involved in the “weeds” of license agreements or the prosecution of an action to obtain access pursuant to an RPAPL § 881 action, which are typically owner responsibilities, GCs and CMs should understand the change in law, as there may be circumstances where they are responsible for securing access. This alert outlines the key statutory changes and explains the operational, scheduling, insurance, and risk‑management implications for the New York construction industry. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and David Polazzi, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Polazzi may be contacted at dpolazzi@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    September 01, 2026 —
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments. In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team