BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico custom homes expert witness Catron County New Mexico housing expert witness Catron County New Mexico hospital construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness Catron County New Mexico custom home expert witness Catron County New Mexico retail construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico institutional building expert witness Catron County New Mexico condominiums expert witness Catron County New Mexico parking structure expert witness Catron County New Mexico condominium expert witness Catron County New Mexico industrial building expert witness Catron County New Mexico production housing expert witness Catron County New Mexico concrete tilt-up expert witness Catron County New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico tract home expert witness Catron County New Mexico landscaping construction expert witness Catron County New Mexico multi family housing expert witness Catron County New Mexico Medical building expert witness Catron County New Mexico low-income housing expert witness Catron County New Mexico casino resort expert witness Catron County New Mexico
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Catron County, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Catron County New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102


    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355
    http://www.ruidosobuilders.com

    SW New Mexico Home Builders Association
    Local # 3270
    PO Box 1962
    Silver City, NM 88062
    http://www.rbigelow@gilanet.com

    Building Contractors Association of Otero County
    Local # 3283
    PO Box 4382
    Alamogordo, NM 88310


    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109
    http://www.nmhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Central New Mexico
    Local # 3218
    4100 Wolcott Ave NE Ste B
    Albuquerque, NM 87109
    http://www.hbacnm.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Catron County New Mexico

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Water Damage Claims

    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    Demonstrating A Fraudulent Inducement Claim Or Defense

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied

    Create a Culture of Safety to Improve Labor Recruitment Efforts

    No Collapse Coverage Where Policy's Collapse Provisions Deleted

    California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction

    Better Building Rules Would Help U.K.'s Flooding Woes, CEP Says

    Apartment Construction Ominously Nears 25-Year High

    Shiloh and Vallejo: The DOI Tale of Two Properties

    Court Holds That Property Insurance Does Not Cover Economic Loss From Purchasing Counterfeit Vintage Wine

    Enhanced Geothermal Energy Could Be the Next Zero-Carbon Hero

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2024 NY Metro Super Lawyers Lists

    Focusing on Design Elements of the 2014 World Cup Stadiums

    Basement Foundation Systems’ Getting an Overhaul

    Contractor Jailed for Home Repair Fraud

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap Dispute

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    Remand of Bad Faith Claim Evidences Split Among Florida District Courts

    Update: Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    Tallest U.S. Skyscraper Dream Kept Alive by Irish Builder

    American Arbitration Association Revises Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    Always Keep Your Time Limits in Mind—to Know When You Can Sue, and When You Can No Longer Be Sued (Law Note)

    Mediating is Eye Opening

    Harmon Tower Case Settled Prior to Start of Trial

    Insurance and Reconstruction: A Guide for Property Owners Facing Wildfire Aftermath and Other Disasters

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    Can Your Employee File a Personal Injury Claim if They’re Injured at Work?

    Residential Construction Surges in Durham

    Why Ethiopia’s $5 Billion Dam Has Riled Its Neighbors

    State Farm Unsuccessful In Seeking Dismissal of Qui Tam Case

    Collapse Claim Dismissed

    Eleventh Circuit Finds Professional Services Exclusion Applies to Construction Management Activities

    U.S. Supreme Court Weighs in on Construction Case

    Contractual Impartiality Requires an Appraiser to be Unbiased, Disinterested, and Unswayed by Personal Interest

    Trump Budget Would Slash Some Construction Spending, Boost Transportation Projects

    Seven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking Contaminants

    Incorporation, Indemnity and Statutes of Limitations, Oh My!

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    De-escalating The Impact of Price Escalation

    Personal Injury Claims – The Basics

    California Bid Protests: Responsiveness and Materiality

    Forensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam Failure

    As Recovery Continues, Home Improvement Stores Make Sales

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes
    Corporate Profile

    CATRON COUNTY NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Catron County, New Mexico Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive resources which comprise licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Catron County and the surrounding areas.

    Catron County New Mexico construction expert witnessCatron County New Mexico consulting engineersCatron County New Mexico forensic architectCatron County New Mexico building code compliance expert witnessCatron County New Mexico building envelope expert witnessCatron County New Mexico expert witness roofingCatron County New Mexico construction expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Catron County, New Mexico

    Additional Insureds Owed a Defense in Underlying Personal Injury Suit

    March 03, 2026 —
    The court granted partial summary judgment on the duty to defend to two additional insureds who were named as defendants in the underlying personal injury suit. In re Third St. Equity, LLC, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234909 (E.D. N. Y. Dec. 2, 2025). Third Street Equity LLD hired Developing NY State, LLC as the contractor for a construction project. Developing NY entered a subcontract agreement with Capital Source Concrete NY LLC for concrete work as well as labor and services for a construction project. The subcontract required that Capital Concrete keep the construction site free of debris, waste material or rubbish. Further, Capital Concrete was responsible for compliance with OSHA safety regulations. It was also agreed that Capital Concrete would obtain liability and workers compensation insurance naming Third Street and Developing NY as additional insureds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    May 14, 2026 —
    On December 5, 2025, CMiC and Dodge released a survey asking over 6,000 companies across various sectors of the construction industry their stance on artificial intelligence—whether they use it or not; whether they like it or not; whether they have or are planning to implement it or not; and so on. Considering its reputation for skepticism and reluctance when it comes to adopting new forms of technology, the construction industry pleasantly surprised CMiC and Dodge with its answers to these questions, with 87% of contractors believing AI will have a meaningful impact on construction. “The research indicates the construction industry is nearing a tipping point for AI adoption,” says Steve Jones, senior director of industry insights at Dodge Construction Network, who sat down with Construction Executive to delve further into the survey questions and answers and what the industry’s current position on them means for AI’s future role in construction. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    March 31, 2026 —
    Effective April 18, 2026, the New York Legislature enacted the Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (“AVOID”) Act, amending CPLR 1007—the statute that governs third-party practice. The amendment sharply limits when and how defendants can commence third-party actions, curbing the expansive discretion they previously enjoyed and targeting the late-stage impleaders that often upend case schedules. What Changes Before the AVOID Act was signed into law on December 19, 2025 (and subsequently modified by Chapter Amendments A9502 and S8809, signed by Governor Hochul on February 13, 2026[1]), CPLR 1007 gave defendants broad latitude to implead “any person who is or may be liable” for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim. CPLR 1007 specified no outside time limit for the initiation of a third-party claim; courts assessed only whether a defendant’s delay was undue—such as impleading months after the note of issue—and whether the plaintiff would suffer prejudice if the third-party action were not severed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sophia L. Cahill, Sheppard
    Ms. Cahill may be contacted at scahill@sheppard.com

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com