BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico condominiums expert witness Chimayo New Mexico multi family housing expert witness Chimayo New Mexico production housing expert witness Chimayo New Mexico Medical building expert witness Chimayo New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico parking structure expert witness Chimayo New Mexico tract home expert witness Chimayo New Mexico office building expert witness Chimayo New Mexico industrial building expert witness Chimayo New Mexico structural steel construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico condominium expert witness Chimayo New Mexico retail construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico casino resort expert witness Chimayo New Mexico custom home expert witness Chimayo New Mexico low-income housing expert witness Chimayo New Mexico institutional building expert witness Chimayo New Mexico custom homes expert witness Chimayo New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness Chimayo New Mexico townhome construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness Chimayo New Mexico housing expert witness Chimayo New Mexico
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Chimayo, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Chimayo New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Santa Fe Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3278
    1409 Luisa Street Suite A
    Santa Fe, NM 87505
    http://www.sfahba.com

    San Juan Co Home Builders Association Affil w/ National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 3275
    PO Box 5565
    Farmington, NM 87499


    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109
    http://www.nmhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Central New Mexico
    Local # 3218
    4100 Wolcott Ave NE Ste B
    Albuquerque, NM 87109
    http://www.hbacnm.com

    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102


    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355
    http://www.ruidosobuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Chimayo New Mexico

    First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years

    Misread of Other Insurance Clause Becomes Costly for Insurer

    California Supreme Court Confirms the Right to Repair Act as the Exclusive Remedy for Seeking Relief for Defects in New Residential Construction

    Ninth Circuit: Speculative Injuries Do Not Confer Article III Standing

    Contractual “Pay if Paid” and “Pay when Paid” Clauses? What is a California Construction Subcontractor to Do?

    The End of Eroding Limits Policies in Nevada is Just the Beginning

    Best Construction Technology Podcasts in 2025

    The Choice Is Yours – Or Is It? Anti-Choice-of-Laws Statutes Applicable to Construction Contracts

    Narrow Promissory Estoppel Exception to Create Insurance Coverage

    “A No-Lose Proposition?”

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    A Classic Blunder: Practical Advice for Avoiding Two-Front Wars

    Your Excess Policy May Not “Follow Form” to Your Primary Policy’s Aggregate Limits: How to Avoid a Multi-Million Dollar Mistake

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    Diggerland, UK’s Construction Equipment Theme Park, is coming to the U.S.

    Supreme Court Holds Arbitrator can Fully Decide Threshold Arbitrability Issue

    Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the Market

    Just Because You Caused it, Doesn’t Mean You Own It: The Hooker Exception to the Privette Doctrine

    Virginia General Assembly Tweaks Pay-if-Paid Ban

    Contracting Chaos? How Mid-America v. US Department of Transportation is Upending DBE Certifications

    California’s Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements: Public Works and AB 3018, What You Need to Know

    Appellate Attorney’s Fees and the Significant Issues Test

    Kahana Feld Partner Noelle Natoli Named President of Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    How Long does a Florida Condo Association Have to File a Construction Defect Claim?

    Contract Disruptions: Navigating Supply Constraints and Labor Shortages

    5 Ways Equipment Financing is Empowering Small Construction Businesses

    New Homes in Palo Alto to Be Electric-Car Ready

    New York Court Holds That the “Lesser of Two” Doctrine Limits Recoverable Damages in Subrogation Actions

    New Evidence Code Requires Attorney to Obtain Written Acknowledgement that the Confidential Nature of Mediation has been Disclosed to the Client

    Factories Boost U.S. Output as Builders Gain Confidence: Economy

    Insurance Coverage for COVID-19? Two N.J. Courts Allow Litigation to Proceed

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Stormy Skies Ahead? Important News Regarding a Hard Construction Insurance Market

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    Kentucky Supreme Court Creates New “Goldilocks Zone” to Limit Opinions of Biomechanical Experts

    Cameron Kalunian to Speak at Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Homeowner Who Wins Case Against Swimming Pool Contractor Gets a Splash of Cold Water When it Comes to Attorneys’ Fees

    The 411 on the New 415 Location of the Golden State Warriors

    Meet Your Future Team Members: AI Agents

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    Changes To Commercial Item Contracting

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking in The U.S. News – Best Lawyers ® as “Best Law Firms”!

    Truck Hits Warning Beam That Falls, Kills Motorist at Las Vegas Bridge Project

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    Roof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm Covered

    Do Construction Contracts and Fraud Mix After All?

    NYC Hires Engineer LERA for Parking Garage Collapse Probe

    Court Grants Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment After Insured Fails to Provide Evidence of Systemic Collapse

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects
    Corporate Profile

    CHIMAYO NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Chimayo, New Mexico Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Chimayo and the surrounding areas.

    Chimayo New Mexico expert witness concrete failureChimayo New Mexico building code compliance expert witnessChimayo New Mexico building envelope expert witnessChimayo New Mexico construction project management expert witnessChimayo New Mexico construction claims expert witnessChimayo New Mexico ada design expert witnessChimayo New Mexico construction safety expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Chimayo, New Mexico

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    February 17, 2026 —
    When drafting or negotiating a contract, it is important to consider key time-related facts. In other words, if there are important provisions dealing with time, you don’t want to leave them undefined as that can create an ambiguity in the contract. In a recent case dealing with an investment contract, discussed here, that’s exactly what happened. The contract allowed investors to exercise an option to return their equity in exchange for a refund of their investment but the contract didn’t contain an expiration date on when the option must be exercised. The investors tried to exercise the option two years later leading to a dispute as to whether that was a “reasonable time.” This is because the lack of clarity regarding this temporal fact led to a latent ambiguity meaning it was a question of fact as to whether the investors exercising the option two years later was reasonable under the circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    March 31, 2026 —
    A multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    PSA: Getting the First Mechanic’s Lien on a Project is a Plus

    January 26, 2026 —
    As those that read this construction law blog are aware, I am a big fan of mechanic’s liens as a way to get paid. These powerful and tricky beasts are a great way to get an owner’s attention and to put payment pressure on those that owe you money. Recently I was reminded that getting a lien prepared and recorded both carefully and quickly can be key to getting paid on a problem project. Not only should construction professionals keep the 150-day rule and the 90-day rule in mind, but they should also be quick on the trigger when it becomes clear that a mechanic’s lien will be necessary. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    HHMR: A Retrospective — Chapter One (2001–2025)

    January 26, 2026 —
    There comes a point in every career when you stop long enough to look back, not out of nostalgia, but out of clarity. You begin to see the arc, the accidents, the grace, and the moments when others carried more of the burden than you realized at the time. For me, that moment came recently, somewhere between the twenty-fifth year of practicing construction litigation and the rewriting of our firm’s operating agreement. I found myself asking a question I should have asked long ago: What are we building, and will it last? The truth is that we at HHMR do not build anything. Our clients do. They are the ones building Colorado, from single-family homes and multifamily developments to commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects, navigating every constraint, hurdle, and barrier this state presents to them. They are the men and women in the arena, in Theodore Roosevelt’s sense. They pour foundations, frame walls, manage subs, balance supply chains, and take the risks inherent in the act of building anything of value. And for that work, they get sued. My job, and the job of this firm, is to defend them. We are their champions. Understanding this truth is the starting point of HHMR 2.0. But to appreciate where we are going, you must first understand from where we came. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com