BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Vado New Mexico condominium expert witness Vado New Mexico tract home expert witness Vado New Mexico low-income housing expert witness Vado New Mexico custom home expert witness Vado New Mexico office building expert witness Vado New Mexico hospital construction expert witness Vado New Mexico parking structure expert witness Vado New Mexico housing expert witness Vado New Mexico custom homes expert witness Vado New Mexico structural steel construction expert witness Vado New Mexico retail construction expert witness Vado New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness Vado New Mexico multi family housing expert witness Vado New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness Vado New Mexico landscaping construction expert witness Vado New Mexico institutional building expert witness Vado New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness Vado New Mexico condominiums expert witness Vado New Mexico concrete tilt-up expert witness Vado New Mexico townhome construction expert witness Vado New Mexico production housing expert witness Vado New Mexico
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Vado, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Vado New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Southern New Mexico
    Local # 3254
    PO Box 2608
    Las Cruces, NM 88004
    http://www.biasnm.org

    Building Contractors Association of Otero County
    Local # 3283
    PO Box 4382
    Alamogordo, NM 88310


    SW New Mexico Home Builders Association
    Local # 3270
    PO Box 1962
    Silver City, NM 88062
    http://www.rbigelow@gilanet.com

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355
    http://www.ruidosobuilders.com

    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202


    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102


    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109
    http://www.nmhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Vado New Mexico

    The Condominium Warranty Against Structural Defects in the District of Columbia

    Partner John Toohey is Nominated for West Coast Casualty’s Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence!

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Problems with Common Law

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    Mortenson Subcontractor Fires Worker Over Meta Data Center Noose

    Coverage, Bad Faith Upheld In Construction Defect Case

    Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Denied in Collapse Claim

    Louisiana Court Applies Manifestation Trigger to Affirm Denial of Coverage

    Does “Faulty Workmanship” Constitute An Occurrence Under Your CGL Policy?

    US-Mexico Border Wall Bids Include Tourist Attraction, Solar Panels

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Serving Notice of Nonpayment Under Miller Act

    Don’t Miss Bremer Whyte Attorneys at West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar in Downtown Disney!

    School District Practice Bulletin: Loose Lips Can Sink More Than Ships

    Weed Property Owner Gets Smoked Under Insurance Policy

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Montrose III: Appeals Court Rejects “Elective Vertical Stacking,” but Declines to Find “Universal Horizontal Exhaustion” Absent Proof of Policy Wordings

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    No Expert Testimony for You: Maryland Federal Court Deems Expert Testimony Inadmissible

    Chinese Telecommunications Ban to Expand to Federally Funded Contracts Effective November 12, 2020

    Know What You’ve Built: An Interview with Timo Makkonen of Congrid

    The Indemnification Limitation in Section 725.06 does not apply to Utility Horizontal-Type Projects

    Claim Against Broker for Failure to Procure Adequate Coverage Survives Summary Judgment

    Rights Afforded to Employees and Employers During Strikes

    Supreme Court Declines to Address CDC Eviction Moratorium

    Failure to Allege Property Damage Within Policy Period Defeats Insured's Claim

    Contractor Gets Green Light to Fix Two Fractured Girders at Salesforce Transit Center

    United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in EEOC Subpoena Case

    Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical Bulletin

    HOA Fines Capped at $100: Immediate Impact of California’s AB 130

    Lake Charles Tower’s Window Damage Perplexes Engineers

    Designers Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse Fallout

    Delaware Supreme Court Choice of Law Ruling Vacates a $13.7 Million Verdict Against Travelers

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Insured's Challenge to Use of Xactimate Software to Determine Repair Costs for Damage Fails

    Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?

    Seattle’s Newest Residential Developer

    Supreme Court Upholds Prevailing Wage Statute

    Tick Tock: Don’t Let the Statute of Repose or Limitations Time Periods Run on Your Construction Claims

    Florida Supreme Court Decision Limits Special Damages Presented to Juries

    Safe and Safer

    Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot

    Doing Construction Lead Programs the Right Way

    Employer’s Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Appraisal Can Go Forward Prior to Resolution of Coverage Dispute

    Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal Suggests Negligent Repairs to Real Property Are Not Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Express Warranty Trumping Spearin’s Implied Warranty

    Insurer Need Not Pay for Rejected Defense When No Reservation of Rights Issued

    Rebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year Later

    The Oregon Tort Claims Act (“OTCA”) Applies When a Duty Arises from Statute or Common Law and is Independent from The Terms of a Specific Contract. (OR)
    Corporate Profile

    VADO NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Vado, New Mexico Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with regional assets which comprise construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Vado and the surrounding areas.

    Vado New Mexico construction cost estimating expert witnessVado New Mexico construction expertsVado New Mexico contractor expert witnessVado New Mexico soil failure expert witnessVado New Mexico consulting engineersVado New Mexico construction scheduling expert witnessVado New Mexico engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Vado, New Mexico

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    March 03, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a go‑to tool for aggregating and summarizing large volumes of data, formulating and testing arguments, and even sketching litigation strategies. But a recent ruling from the Southern District of New York serves as a stark warning: when clients turn to generative AI for legal strategy, they may be unknowingly turning privileged information over to a third party and then creating documents that may later be discoverable in litigation. In a closely watched bench decision, Judge Rakoff ruled that AI‑generated documents created by the target of a criminal investigation using Anthropic’s Claude were not privileged despite being generated with information learned from his attorneys to support his potential legal defense and then shared with his counsel. The decision highlights the unresolved and increasingly consequential intersection of AI, privilege, and discovery. Facts Bradley Heppner received a grand jury subpoena and hired attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to represent him. After learning he was a target of the investigation, but before he was arrested, he created 31 documents with Claude using information from his attorneys to outline a potential defense strategy. He was later arrested on charges of securities and wire fraud, and federal agents seized his electronic devices, which contained the 31 documents that had been provided to his attorneys. Mr. Heppner argued that the documents were created to prepare his potential defense strategy in anticipation of an indictment, but he conceded that he made the decision to prepare the reports on his own, i.e., not at the direction of counsel. He nevertheless claimed the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine; the government moved to overrule the objections. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher J. Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Freddy X. Muñoz, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Muñoz may be contacted at fmunoz@pecklaw.com Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    February 23, 2026 —
    By April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case. For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and litigation strategy to the very front end of a claim—particularly in New York Labor Law and construction defect cases. What Changed—and Why It Matters to Construction Cases Historically, New York defendants could implead subcontractors and other players well into discovery. The AVOID Act ends that practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jacqueline McCalla as Its Newest Partner

    February 02, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – January 28, 2026 – Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion is pleased to announce that Walnut Creek attorney Jacqueline McCalla has been elected to partnership. Jacqueline focuses her practice on business and construction litigation. In her practice, Jacqueline takes pride in assisting businesses of all sizes and entrepreneurs in various matters whether it be a pre-litigation matter or in litigation, from case inception through trial. She represents developers, builders, and contractors in complex, multi-party disputes involving a variety of residential, commercial, and mixed-use properties. Jacqueline's practice also includes litigating insurance disputes. Jacqueline leverages her past experience advocating for both carriers and insureds to now help companies better understand their policies and stay protected. "Since joining the firm, Jacqueline has been a thoughtful, hardworking, and solutions-oriented attorney who consistently delivers great results for our clients," said Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff. "It's no surprise that clients value her work and actively seek her out." Jacqueline earned a B.A. in Legal Studies from University of California, Berkeley, and a J.D., from University of San Francisco School of Law, graduating magna cum laude. About Newmeyer Dillion For over 40 years, Newmeyer Dillion has delivered creative and outstanding legal solutions and trial results that achieve client objectives in diverse industries. With over 60 attorneys working as a cohesive team to represent clients in all aspects of business, employment, real estate, environmental/land use, and insurance law, Newmeyer Dillion delivers holistic and integrated legal services tailored to propel each client's operations, growth, and profits. Headquartered in Newport Beach, California, with offices in Walnut Creek, California and Las Vegas, Nevada, Newmeyer Dillion attorneys are recognized by The Best Lawyers in America©, and Super Lawyers as top tier and some of the best lawyers in California and Nevada, and have been given Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review's AV Preeminent® highest rating. For additional information, call 949.854.7000 or visit www.newmeyerdillion.com.