Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision
April 20, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted).
The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id.
In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team
May 12, 2026 —
Richard Korman - Engineering News-RecordHDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Richard Korman, Engineering News-RecordMr. Korman may be contacted at
kormanr@enr.com
GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100
April 20, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniGordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships.
In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies
March 10, 2026 —
Sara Beiro Farabow & Michael Wagner - The Construction SeytVolatile U.S. tariff announcements continue to affect international supply chains for U.S. construction projects. Although recent litigation has centered on the scope of presidential tariff authority rather than construction‑specific disputes, these decisions carry important implications for how parties structure risk in their contracts. In May 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) struck down certain “Liberation Day” tariffs as exceeding presidential authority under IEEPA. A federal district court in Washington, D.C. likewise issued a preliminary injunction suspending related tariffs—though it later stayed its own order pending appeal. And the Supreme Court has agreed to review cases addressing the legal limits of IEEPA‑based tariffs.
While none of these developments arises from construction disputes, the themes they highlight—timing, statutory authority, and documentation—mirror the issues encountered when tariff conditions disrupt international procurement. The following strategies reflect practical steps U.S. project owners, contractors, and foreign suppliers can take to mitigate risk, drawing on drafting approaches now widely used across major construction forms, including—but not limited to—modified AIA agreements.
Reprinted courtesy of
Sara Beiro Farabow, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and
Michael Wagner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Ms. Farabow may be contacted at sfarabow@seyfarth.com
Mr. Wagner may be contacted at mewagner@seyfarth.com
Read the full story...
Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements
March 17, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesWhen dealing with a claim on a federal construction project, there are a couple of key background jurisdictional points. These points were briefly highlighted in the recent appeal, Mega Star Logistics Service Co. v. Department of State, CBCA 8232, 2026 WL 253738 (CBCA 2026). Here are the two points.
FIRST, when it comes to jurisdiction, for a board of contract appeals “to exercise jurisdiction over a claim, the CDA [Contract Disputes Act] requires the contractor to submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a COFD [contracting officer final decision], with a subsequent appeal of the COFD or deemed denial if the CO [contracting officer] does not issue a COFD.” Thus, you need to submit a formal claim under the Contract Disputes Act to the contracting officer to get a final decision from the contracting officer (or the contracting officer waiving the final decision by not timely furnishing one). Mega Star Logistics, supra.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations
August 03, 2026 —
Amanda G. Halter, Ashleigh K. Myers & Jillian Marullo - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogFor nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the
Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026.
As discussed
previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas.
Reprinted courtesy of
Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury,
Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and
Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury
Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com
Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com
Read the full story...
Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit
May 12, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPCongratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations.
After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring
Hunton Insurance Lawyer, Adriana Perez, Selected to the National Association of Women Lawyers’ 2023 Rising ListMixed Reality for Construction: Applicability and RealityBetter Building Rules Would Help U.K.'s Flooding Woes, CEP SaysWisconsin Court of Appeals Re-affirms American Girl To Find Coverage for Damage Caused by SubcontractorsFrom Both Sides Now: Looking at Contracts Through a Post-Pandemic LensChinese Hunt for Trophy Properties Boosts NYC, London PricesTop 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and ClaimsEmployee Handbooks—Your First Line of DefenseRelying Upon Improper Exclusion to Deny Coverage Allows Bad Faith Claim to Survive Summary JudgmentFederal Court Holds That Other Insurance Analysis Is Unnecessary If Policies Cover Different RisksTrends in Project Delivery Methods in ConstructionConstruction Materials Company CEO Sees Upturn in Building, Leading to JobsAs California Faces Mandatory Water Use Reductions How Will the Construction Industry be Impacted?Pennsylvania Superior Court Tightens Requirements for Co-Worker Affidavits in Asbestos CasesCold Weat
Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot
Be Careful with Good Faith Payments
Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment
Biden’s Buy American Policy & What it Means for Contractors
Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision
School System Settles Design Defect Suit for $5.2Million
California Senator Proposes Bill to Require Contractors to Report Construction Defect Cases
Enforcement Of Contractual Terms (E.G., Flow-Down, Field Verification, Shop Drawing Approval, And No-Damage-For-Delay Provisions)
No Interlocutory Appeals of "Garden-Variety" Contract Disputes
CDJ’s #5 Topic of the Year: Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, et al.
Homeowners Sued for Failing to Disclose Defects
A Homeowner’s Subsequent Action is Barred as a Matter of Law by way of a Prior “Right to Repair Act” Claim Resolved by Cash Settlement for Waiver of all Known or Unknown Claims
Reminder: FOLLOW Your Well Drafted Contract Provisions
Recovering For Inflation On Federal Contracts: Recent DOD Guidance On Economic Price Adjustment Clauses
A Brief Primer on Perfecting Your Mechanics Lien When the Property Owner Files Bankruptcy
Quick Note: Discretion in Determining Prevailing Party for Purposes of Attorney’s Fees
GRSM Named #1 Fastest-Growing Am Law Firm
Green Buildings Could Lead to Liabilities
Intel's $20B Ohio 'Mega-Site' is Latest Development in Chip Makers' Rush to Boost US Production
Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers
Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion
Drill Rig Accident Kills Engineering Manager, Injures Operator in Philadelphia
Angelo Mozilo Speaks: No Regrets at Countrywide
Deescalating Hyper Escalation
Bridges Crumble as Muni Rates at Least Since ’60s Ignored
There Is No Sympathy If You Fail to Read Closely the Final Negotiated Construction Contract
Harmon Tower Opponents to Try Mediation
Not so Fast! How Does Revoking Acceleration of a Note Impact the Statute of Limitations?
Greg Dillion & Newmeyer Dillion Named 2019 Good Scout Award Recipient
We Knew Concrete Could Absorb Carbon—New Study Tells How Much
Green Construction Claims: More of the Same
Triable Issue of Fact Exists as to Insurer’s Obligation to Provide Coverage Under Occurrence Policy
South Africa Wants Payment From Colluding World Cup Builders
Conflict of Interest Accusations may Spark Lawsuit Against City and City Manager
California Reinstates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave
Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim
Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm
Nevada Provides Independant Counsel When Conflict Arises Between Insurer and Insured
New York Court of Appeals Addresses Choice of Law Challenges
Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold Due to Insurer
For Breach of Contract Claim, There Needs to be a Breach of a Contractual Duty
Deterioration Known To Insured Forecloses Collapse Coverage
Will the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?
Waiver of Subrogation Enforced, Denying Insurers Recovery Against Additional Insured in $500 Million Off-Shore Oil Rig Loss
Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit
Formal Opinion No. 2020-203: How A Lawyer Is to Handle Access to Client Confidential Information and Anticipation of Potential Security Issues
Insurer in Bad Faith For Refusing to Commit to Appraisal
A Termination for Convenience Is Not a Termination for Default
Arbitration Denied: Third Appellate District Holds Arbitration Clause Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable
More on Fraud, Opinions and Contracts
